Enteral Nimodipine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Real-World Application and Challenges.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3663
Gavindeep Shinger, Jennifer Haymond, Flora Young, Timothy S Leung
{"title":"Enteral Nimodipine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Real-World Application and Challenges.","authors":"Gavindeep Shinger, Jennifer Haymond, Flora Young, Timothy S Leung","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend nimodipine as the standard of care for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Compared with placebo, this agent has been shown to reduce death and dependency on others for activities of daily living. However, retrospective data suggest that patients may not receive full treatment with nimodipine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with aSAH admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or high-acuity unit (HAU) at a tertiary referral hospital who received the guideline-recommended dose and duration of nimodipine. A secondary objective was to describe barriers to receiving full treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review involved a convenience sample of 100 patients with aSAH who were admitted to the ICU or HAU of a tertiary referral hospital between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2022. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients with aSAH admitted to the ICU or HAU, 1 (1%) received the guideline-recommended dose and duration of nimodipine. Ninety-five (95%) of the patients experienced a delay to initiation, mainly due to transfer from another hospital (<i>n</i> = 45, 47%) and/or lack of a safe enteral route (<i>n</i> = 62, 65%). Sixty-six (66%) of the patients received alternative dosing, most because their blood pressure was below target (<i>n</i> = 16, 24%) or because of vasospasm requiring a higher blood pressure target (<i>n</i> = 22, 33%). A total of 99 patients (99%) had early discontinuation and/or treatment interruption of nimodipine; reasons included vasospasm requiring a higher blood pressure target (<i>n</i> = 12, 12%) and nimodipine not being continued on transfer or discharge (<i>n</i> = 14, 14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the patients in this study did not receive the full course of nimodipine therapy due to multiple barriers. Pharmacists can play a role in optimizing treatment by educating staff at transferring sites about timely initiation of therapy, reconciling medications on transfer or discharge, and mitigating interactions with concomitant medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 2","pages":"e3663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend nimodipine as the standard of care for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Compared with placebo, this agent has been shown to reduce death and dependency on others for activities of daily living. However, retrospective data suggest that patients may not receive full treatment with nimodipine.

Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with aSAH admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or high-acuity unit (HAU) at a tertiary referral hospital who received the guideline-recommended dose and duration of nimodipine. A secondary objective was to describe barriers to receiving full treatment.

Methods: This retrospective chart review involved a convenience sample of 100 patients with aSAH who were admitted to the ICU or HAU of a tertiary referral hospital between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2022. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics.

Results: Of the 100 patients with aSAH admitted to the ICU or HAU, 1 (1%) received the guideline-recommended dose and duration of nimodipine. Ninety-five (95%) of the patients experienced a delay to initiation, mainly due to transfer from another hospital (n = 45, 47%) and/or lack of a safe enteral route (n = 62, 65%). Sixty-six (66%) of the patients received alternative dosing, most because their blood pressure was below target (n = 16, 24%) or because of vasospasm requiring a higher blood pressure target (n = 22, 33%). A total of 99 patients (99%) had early discontinuation and/or treatment interruption of nimodipine; reasons included vasospasm requiring a higher blood pressure target (n = 12, 12%) and nimodipine not being continued on transfer or discharge (n = 14, 14%).

Conclusions: Most of the patients in this study did not receive the full course of nimodipine therapy due to multiple barriers. Pharmacists can play a role in optimizing treatment by educating staff at transferring sites about timely initiation of therapy, reconciling medications on transfer or discharge, and mitigating interactions with concomitant medications.

尼莫地平在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的应用与挑战。
背景:指南推荐尼莫地平作为动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者的标准治疗。与安慰剂相比,这种药物已被证明可以减少死亡和在日常生活活动中对他人的依赖。然而,回顾性数据显示,患者可能无法接受尼莫地平的全面治疗。目的:主要目的是确定三级转诊医院重症监护病房(ICU)或高度层病房(HAU)接受指南推荐剂量和持续时间的aSAH患者的比例。第二个目标是描述接受全面治疗的障碍。方法:本回顾性图表回顾纳入了2012年1月1日至2022年8月31日期间入住三级转诊医院ICU或HAU的100例aSAH患者。分析基于描述性统计。结果:在100例入住ICU或HAU的aSAH患者中,1例(1%)接受了指南推荐的尼莫地平剂量和疗程。95例(95%)患者延迟开始治疗,主要是由于从另一家医院转院(n = 45,47 %)和/或缺乏安全的肠内途径(n = 62,65 %)。66例(66%)患者接受了替代剂量,大多数是因为他们的血压低于目标(n = 16, 24%)或因为血管痉挛需要更高的血压目标(n = 22, 33%)。共有99例(99%)患者早期停药和/或尼莫地平治疗中断;原因包括血管痉挛需要更高的血压目标(n = 12,12%)和尼莫地平在转移或出院时没有继续使用(n = 14,14%)。结论:由于多重障碍,本研究中大部分患者未接受尼莫地平治疗全程。药剂师可以在优化治疗方面发挥作用,教育转院的工作人员及时开始治疗,在转院或出院时协调用药,减轻与伴随用药的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信