Proceedings of the Round Table Discussion on the Fifth International Symposium on Otosclerosis and Stapes Surgery.

Said Sönmez, Kadir Serkan Orhan, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Andrzej Zarowski, Nuri Osman Özgirgin, Maurizio Barbara, Christof Röösli, Isabelle Mösnier, Marco Caversaccio, Yann Nguyen, Vedat Topsakal
{"title":"Proceedings of the Round Table Discussion on the Fifth International Symposium on Otosclerosis and Stapes Surgery.","authors":"Said Sönmez, Kadir Serkan Orhan, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Andrzej Zarowski, Nuri Osman Özgirgin, Maurizio Barbara, Christof Röösli, Isabelle Mösnier, Marco Caversaccio, Yann Nguyen, Vedat Topsakal","doi":"10.5152/iao.2025.241839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Debates and research about otosclerosis and stapes surgery have continued since the time it was described, and there is still no consensus on many issues. The aim of this article is to report the controversies in the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, imaging, treatment, and management of otosclerosis and address the points of consensus of experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the last session of the Fifth International Otosclerosis and Stapes Surgery Symposium held in Brussels, a round table meeting was held where controversial issues in otosclerosis and stapes surgery were discussed, and a survey was administered to all participants. Nine experienced panelists were interviewed by the moderator on stage, and 166 participants provided their answers interactively through the online voting system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the panelists were experts in their field who had performed more than 1000 cases, and if we take into account the more experienced participants, the results are based on at least 16 968 stapes surgery experiences. While full consensus was reached by the expert panelists on 14 questions, agreement was reached by participants on only 2. The most striking difference between the panelists and attendees was regarding reparative granuloma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if a consensus was reached on some issues, controversies, especially the surgical technique, medical equipment and prostheses used are subjects to both discussion and development. Even the experts who come to present and share knowledge do not always agree. It is strongly recommended that clinicians follow all developments, compare their results with those of others, and use the techniques and materials with which they feel most comfortable for their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"21 2","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2025.241839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Debates and research about otosclerosis and stapes surgery have continued since the time it was described, and there is still no consensus on many issues. The aim of this article is to report the controversies in the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, imaging, treatment, and management of otosclerosis and address the points of consensus of experts.

Methods: In the last session of the Fifth International Otosclerosis and Stapes Surgery Symposium held in Brussels, a round table meeting was held where controversial issues in otosclerosis and stapes surgery were discussed, and a survey was administered to all participants. Nine experienced panelists were interviewed by the moderator on stage, and 166 participants provided their answers interactively through the online voting system.

Results: All of the panelists were experts in their field who had performed more than 1000 cases, and if we take into account the more experienced participants, the results are based on at least 16 968 stapes surgery experiences. While full consensus was reached by the expert panelists on 14 questions, agreement was reached by participants on only 2. The most striking difference between the panelists and attendees was regarding reparative granuloma.

Conclusion: Even if a consensus was reached on some issues, controversies, especially the surgical technique, medical equipment and prostheses used are subjects to both discussion and development. Even the experts who come to present and share knowledge do not always agree. It is strongly recommended that clinicians follow all developments, compare their results with those of others, and use the techniques and materials with which they feel most comfortable for their patients.

第五届耳硬化与镫骨外科国际学术研讨会圆桌会议论文集。
背景:关于耳硬化和镫骨手术的争论和研究自其被描述以来一直在继续,在许多问题上仍然没有达成共识。本文的目的是报告在耳硬化的病因、病理生理、诊断、影像学、治疗和管理方面的争议,并解决专家共识的问题。方法:在布鲁塞尔举行的第五届国际耳硬化和镫骨手术研讨会上,召开圆桌会议,讨论耳硬化和镫骨手术的争议问题,并对所有与会者进行调查。主持人在台上采访了9位经验丰富的小组成员,166名参与者通过在线投票系统互动提供了答案。结果:所有的小组成员都是各自领域的专家,他们做了超过1000例的手术,如果我们考虑到更有经验的参与者,结果是基于至少16968例镫骨手术的经验。虽然专家小组成员就14个问题达成了完全一致意见,但与会者仅就2个问题达成了一致意见。小组成员和与会者之间最显著的差异是关于修复性肉芽肿。结论:即使在一些问题上达成了共识,但仍存在争议,特别是手术技术、医疗设备和使用的假体都需要讨论和发展。即使是前来演讲和分享知识的专家也并不总是意见一致。强烈建议临床医生跟踪所有的发展,将他们的结果与其他人的结果进行比较,并使用他们认为最适合患者的技术和材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信