Health Inequity Profiteering by Private Equity Firms.

Q2 Social Sciences
Thomas Statchen, Colleen M Grogan
{"title":"Health Inequity Profiteering by Private Equity Firms.","authors":"Thomas Statchen, Colleen M Grogan","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explains how some investment practices of private equity (PE) firms generate profit by taking advantage of inequitably underserved patients in the US health care system. In particular, patients with general medical or mental health needs who seek care at safety-net hospitals or in carceral facilities and patients seeking mental health services are vulnerable to the following PE strategies: purchasing low-quality practices where patients lack opportunities to get care elsewhere, maximizing consolidation of deeply fragmented health service delivery systems, and avoiding accountability for poor-quality service that results from regulatory opacity. For each problem area, the article offers a policy response to mitigate harm to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 5","pages":"E361-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explains how some investment practices of private equity (PE) firms generate profit by taking advantage of inequitably underserved patients in the US health care system. In particular, patients with general medical or mental health needs who seek care at safety-net hospitals or in carceral facilities and patients seeking mental health services are vulnerable to the following PE strategies: purchasing low-quality practices where patients lack opportunities to get care elsewhere, maximizing consolidation of deeply fragmented health service delivery systems, and avoiding accountability for poor-quality service that results from regulatory opacity. For each problem area, the article offers a policy response to mitigate harm to patients.

私募股权公司的医疗不公平暴利。
本文解释了私募股权(PE)公司的一些投资实践是如何利用美国医疗保健系统中不公平的服务不足的患者来产生利润的。特别是,在安全网医院或收容所寻求治疗的有一般医疗或精神卫生需求的患者以及寻求精神卫生服务的患者容易受到以下PE策略的影响:在患者没有机会在其他地方获得治疗的情况下购买低质量的做法,最大限度地整合极度分散的卫生服务提供系统,以及避免对监管不透明导致的低质量服务负责。对于每个问题领域,本文提供了减轻对患者伤害的政策响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信