Exploring the validity and consistency of antero-posterior skeletal dysplasia indicators: a comprehensive cephalometric study.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Varun Shankar, Raghunath Nagasundara Rao, Ganiga C Shivakumar, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Rocco Franco, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini
{"title":"Exploring the validity and consistency of antero-posterior skeletal dysplasia indicators: a comprehensive cephalometric study.","authors":"Varun Shankar, Raghunath Nagasundara Rao, Ganiga C Shivakumar, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Rocco Franco, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04900-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to check the reliability of different antero-posterior skeletal discrepancy indicators and to compare and correlate various craniofacial measurements taken from cephalometric radiographs, to check the reliability of the linear and angular geometric measurements in clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 60 pretreatment lateral cephalographs were taken. Eighteen cephalometric landmarks were marked and considered for the cephalometric measurements; 5 reference planes were considered; 9 linear measurements and 11 angular measurements were taken into consideration to check the reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values were calculated for all the parameters, for all 60 samples. Based on the results of the χ<sup>2</sup> test, Pi linear, AXD angle, Yen angle and Beta angle were significant at P<0.05. Pearsons correlation analysis yielded that Pi linear was negatively correlated with maxilla-mandibular differential. Yen, Beta, HBN and W angles were positively correlated with each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reliable parameters found in this study were Pi linear, YEN angle, Beta angle and AXD angle for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. In conclusion we found that utilization of at least a combination of two or more parameters for the diagnosis and treatment plan should be done in order to be able to yield accurate diagnosis and results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04900-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to check the reliability of different antero-posterior skeletal discrepancy indicators and to compare and correlate various craniofacial measurements taken from cephalometric radiographs, to check the reliability of the linear and angular geometric measurements in clinical diagnosis.

Methods: A sample of 60 pretreatment lateral cephalographs were taken. Eighteen cephalometric landmarks were marked and considered for the cephalometric measurements; 5 reference planes were considered; 9 linear measurements and 11 angular measurements were taken into consideration to check the reliability.

Results: Mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values were calculated for all the parameters, for all 60 samples. Based on the results of the χ2 test, Pi linear, AXD angle, Yen angle and Beta angle were significant at P<0.05. Pearsons correlation analysis yielded that Pi linear was negatively correlated with maxilla-mandibular differential. Yen, Beta, HBN and W angles were positively correlated with each other.

Conclusions: The reliable parameters found in this study were Pi linear, YEN angle, Beta angle and AXD angle for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. In conclusion we found that utilization of at least a combination of two or more parameters for the diagnosis and treatment plan should be done in order to be able to yield accurate diagnosis and results.

探讨前后骨骼发育不良指标的有效性和一致性:一项全面的头颅测量研究。
背景:本研究的目的是检查不同的前后骨骼差异指标的可靠性,比较和关联头颅x线片上的各种颅面测量,检查线性和角度几何测量在临床诊断中的可靠性。方法:取预处理侧位脑电图60张。标记了18个头测标志,并考虑用于头测测量;考虑了5个参考平面;考虑了9个线性测量值和11个角度测量值来检验可靠性。结果:计算了所有60个样本的所有参数的平均值、标准差、最小值和最大值。χ2检验结果显示,Pi线性、AXD角、Yen角、Beta角在p处均有显著性差异。结论:本研究找到的Pi线性、Yen角、Beta角和AXD角为临床诊断和治疗方案的可靠参数。总之,我们发现,为了能够产生准确的诊断和结果,应该至少结合两个或两个以上的参数进行诊断和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信