Attributes that influence testing decisions for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections: A qualitative study among diverse people in Canada.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
M Elizabeth Snow, Mary H Berger, Alexander Ct Tam, Adam Easterbrook, Chidubem Ekpereamaka Okechukwu, Tima Mohammadi, Peter Hutchinson, Sean B Rourke, Aslam H Anis, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Attributes that influence testing decisions for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections: A qualitative study among diverse people in Canada.","authors":"M Elizabeth Snow, Mary H Berger, Alexander Ct Tam, Adam Easterbrook, Chidubem Ekpereamaka Okechukwu, Tima Mohammadi, Peter Hutchinson, Sean B Rourke, Aslam H Anis, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09564624251337595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) disproportionately affect key populations in Canada. For example, recent estimates suggested that the proportion of people living with hepatitis C is the highest among people who use injection drugs and that gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men represent a high proportion of new cases of infectious syphilis. Understanding what STBBIs test users and potential testers perceive as important aspects of testing will help inform testing initiatives. We aimed to determine aspects of STBBI testing that are important to a diverse range of key populations in Canada.MethodsWe conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with people from key populations (gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men; African, Caribbean, or Black individuals; Indigenous individuals; sex workers; people who use substances and injection drugs) and people who do not identify as a key population member. We conducted a thematic analysis.ResultsTwo major themes emerged: stigma and inequality, and journey into and through the healthcare system. Within the first theme, participants had diverse perspectives on how aspects of their identity interacted with willingness to seek testing. Within the second theme, participants discussed aspects of testing. Test costs, wait times, and testing accuracy were all viewed as important, but differing perspectives emerged about privacy of testing and receiving results, testing location, and who administers the test.ConclusionsParticipants' perspectives on STBBI testing and willingness to test were informed by their experiences and aspects of their identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"9564624251337595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251337595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) disproportionately affect key populations in Canada. For example, recent estimates suggested that the proportion of people living with hepatitis C is the highest among people who use injection drugs and that gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men represent a high proportion of new cases of infectious syphilis. Understanding what STBBIs test users and potential testers perceive as important aspects of testing will help inform testing initiatives. We aimed to determine aspects of STBBI testing that are important to a diverse range of key populations in Canada.MethodsWe conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with people from key populations (gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men; African, Caribbean, or Black individuals; Indigenous individuals; sex workers; people who use substances and injection drugs) and people who do not identify as a key population member. We conducted a thematic analysis.ResultsTwo major themes emerged: stigma and inequality, and journey into and through the healthcare system. Within the first theme, participants had diverse perspectives on how aspects of their identity interacted with willingness to seek testing. Within the second theme, participants discussed aspects of testing. Test costs, wait times, and testing accuracy were all viewed as important, but differing perspectives emerged about privacy of testing and receiving results, testing location, and who administers the test.ConclusionsParticipants' perspectives on STBBI testing and willingness to test were informed by their experiences and aspects of their identity.

影响性传播和血液传播感染检测决策的属性:加拿大不同人群的定性研究。
在加拿大,性传播和血液传播感染(STBBIs)不成比例地影响着关键人群。例如,最近的估计表明,在使用注射毒品的人群中,丙型肝炎患者的比例最高,而在感染性梅毒新发病例中,男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者所占比例很高。了解STBBIs测试用户和潜在测试人员认为测试的重要方面将有助于通知测试计划。我们的目的是确定STBBI测试的各个方面对加拿大不同范围的关键人群是重要的。方法对重点人群(男同性恋者、双性恋者和其他男男性行为者;非洲人、加勒比人或黑人;原住民个人;性工作者;使用药物和注射毒品的人,以及不被认定为重点人群成员的人。我们进行了专题分析。结果出现了两个主要主题:耻辱和不平等,以及进入和通过医疗保健系统的旅程。在第一个主题中,参与者对他们身份的各个方面如何与寻求测试的意愿相互作用有不同的看法。在第二个主题中,与会者讨论了测试的各个方面。测试成本、等待时间和测试准确性都被认为是重要的,但是在测试和接收结果的隐私、测试地点以及谁管理测试方面出现了不同的观点。结论被试对STBBI测试的看法和测试意愿受其经历和身份方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信