Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Supination External Rotation Type IV Equivalent Ankle Fractures With and Without Deltoid Repair.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114251329333
Saanchi Kukadia, David Cho, Stephanie Eble, Prashanth Kumar, Alan Shamrock, Mark Drakos
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Supination External Rotation Type IV Equivalent Ankle Fractures With and Without Deltoid Repair.","authors":"Saanchi Kukadia, David Cho, Stephanie Eble, Prashanth Kumar, Alan Shamrock, Mark Drakos","doi":"10.1177/24730114251329333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of consensus on how deltoid injuries should be addressed in the setting of acute ankle fractures. This study aims to evaluate whether deltoid repair during lateral malleolar fracture fixation leads to improved clinical outcomes compared to fixation without deltoid repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study involving 13 surgeons. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older who underwent open fixation for a supination external rotation type IV (SER IV) equivalent ankle fracture. SER IV fractures were confirmed with stress radiographs. Deltoid injury was confirmed with an intraoperative external rotation stress test. A total of 146 patients were included. Eighty patients received a deltoid repair (DR), and 66 patients did not receive a deltoid repair (NDR). Patient-reported outcomes via PROMIS scores were collected preoperatively and at least 1 year postoperatively for all patients. Preoperative and postoperative medial clear space (MCS) were reviewed for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative PROMIS domains between the 2 cohorts. There were also no significant differences in preoperative MCS and postoperative MCS between the 2 cohorts. There were no significant differences in the incidence of subsequent procedures for removal of painful hardware, revisions, infections, progression to arthritis, and persistent pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study compares short- to medium-term outcomes and complications of SER IV-equivalent ankle fractures with and without deltoid repair. No significant differences between PROMIS scores, postoperative MCS, and complication rates were observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective case control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 2","pages":"24730114251329333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251329333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of consensus on how deltoid injuries should be addressed in the setting of acute ankle fractures. This study aims to evaluate whether deltoid repair during lateral malleolar fracture fixation leads to improved clinical outcomes compared to fixation without deltoid repair.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study involving 13 surgeons. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older who underwent open fixation for a supination external rotation type IV (SER IV) equivalent ankle fracture. SER IV fractures were confirmed with stress radiographs. Deltoid injury was confirmed with an intraoperative external rotation stress test. A total of 146 patients were included. Eighty patients received a deltoid repair (DR), and 66 patients did not receive a deltoid repair (NDR). Patient-reported outcomes via PROMIS scores were collected preoperatively and at least 1 year postoperatively for all patients. Preoperative and postoperative medial clear space (MCS) were reviewed for all patients.

Results: There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative PROMIS domains between the 2 cohorts. There were also no significant differences in preoperative MCS and postoperative MCS between the 2 cohorts. There were no significant differences in the incidence of subsequent procedures for removal of painful hardware, revisions, infections, progression to arthritis, and persistent pain.

Conclusion: This study compares short- to medium-term outcomes and complications of SER IV-equivalent ankle fractures with and without deltoid repair. No significant differences between PROMIS scores, postoperative MCS, and complication rates were observed between groups.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective case control study.

旋后外旋IV型等效踝关节骨折伴与不伴三角肌修复的临床与影像学结果比较。
背景:在急性踝关节骨折的情况下,三角肌损伤应该如何处理,目前还缺乏共识。本研究旨在评估外踝骨折固定中三角肌修复与不进行三角肌修复相比是否能改善临床结果。方法:这是一项涉及13名外科医生的单中心回顾性研究。纳入标准为年龄在18岁或以上,接受旋后外旋IV型等效踝关节骨折开放固定的患者。应力x线片证实SER IV型骨折。通过术中外旋应力测试证实了三角肌损伤。共纳入146例患者。80例患者接受了三角肌修复术(DR), 66例患者未接受三角肌修复术(NDR)。通过PROMIS评分收集所有患者术前和术后至少1年的患者报告结果。所有患者术前和术后均检查内侧间隙(MCS)。结果:两组患者术前和术后PROMIS域无显著差异。两组患者术前MCS和术后MCS也无显著差异。在移除疼痛硬体、修复、感染、关节炎进展和持续疼痛的后续手术发生率方面没有显著差异。结论:本研究比较了有和没有三角肌修复的seriv等效踝关节骨折的中短期结局和并发症。两组间PROMIS评分、术后MCS和并发症发生率无显著差异。证据等级:III级,回顾性病例对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信