Paediatric Reference Intervals and Curves for Haemoglobin Estimated Using Direct Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vid Bijelić, Marijana Bijelić, Josh Larock, Michael Pham, Franco Momoli, Mira Liebman, Beth K. Potter, Patricia C. Parkin, Jemila S. Hamid
{"title":"Paediatric Reference Intervals and Curves for Haemoglobin Estimated Using Direct Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Vid Bijelić,&nbsp;Marijana Bijelić,&nbsp;Josh Larock,&nbsp;Michael Pham,&nbsp;Franco Momoli,&nbsp;Mira Liebman,&nbsp;Beth K. Potter,&nbsp;Patricia C. Parkin,&nbsp;Jemila S. Hamid","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Haemoglobin is a commonly ordered laboratory test, used to assess both individual and population-level health. To interpret test results, laboratories provide reference intervals (RIs) with lower (2.5th%) and upper (97.5th%) limits according to age and sex. Reference curves (RCs) treat age as a continuous variable. The objectives were to synthesise evidence on Paediatric haemoglobin RIs/RCs and investigate possible sources of heterogeneity. We placed our findings in the context of the age- and sex-based haemoglobin thresholds to define anaemia, recommended for international use by WHO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic review of studies publishing Paediatric haemoglobin RIs/RCs (PROSPERO: CRD42023399802). EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and The Cochrane electronic libraries were searched from inception to July 31, 2023. Studies involving unhealthy children, lacking males and females RIs/RCs, or limited to cord-blood RIs/RCs were excluded. Studies adhering to guidelines for RIs development from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and RCs studies reporting confidence intervals (CIs) were included in the meta-analysis. Lower and upper males and females RI limits were pooled for age groups with heterogeneity <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &lt; 75%. All studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the narrative synthesis. Sources of heterogeneity were analyzed using heatmaps, forest plots and Shiny app.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 9123 studies screened, 177 were retained for full-text review. We identified 48 eligible studies (63 529 male and 59 969 female participants) from 25 countries (4 continents) published 1938–2023. There was inconsistency in age partitioning and length of age intervals. Meta-analysis was conducted on 13 studies reporting RIs and 2 studies reporting RCs. Pooled estimates for the 0–3 months age group could not be generated for males or females due to paucity of data. For children aged 3 months or older, both lower and upper RI limits generally increased with age, from approximately 100 to 130 g/L and from approximately 130 to 150 g/L, respectively. For visualisation of our narrative synthesis of all 48 studies, we created a novel web-based computational tool using Shiny-app. Sources of heterogeneity included child age, sex, analyser type and country. For many studies, the lower RIs were substantially different from WHO anaemia thresholds. Study limitations include a small sample size for younger age groups, potentially impacting heterogeneity estimates, reliance on CLSI guidelines due to the lack of a suitable quality assessment tool for RIs/RCs and restriction to English-language studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence synthesis of locally developed Paediatric haemoglobin RIs/RCs revealed substantial heterogeneity, suggesting the need for more rigorously developed estimates that may be used globally along with WHO thresholds to define anaemia. Future research is needed on RIs for the youngest children. Percentile curves should be explored to provide continuous haemoglobin charts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 4","pages":"588-599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14489","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Haemoglobin is a commonly ordered laboratory test, used to assess both individual and population-level health. To interpret test results, laboratories provide reference intervals (RIs) with lower (2.5th%) and upper (97.5th%) limits according to age and sex. Reference curves (RCs) treat age as a continuous variable. The objectives were to synthesise evidence on Paediatric haemoglobin RIs/RCs and investigate possible sources of heterogeneity. We placed our findings in the context of the age- and sex-based haemoglobin thresholds to define anaemia, recommended for international use by WHO.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of studies publishing Paediatric haemoglobin RIs/RCs (PROSPERO: CRD42023399802). EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and The Cochrane electronic libraries were searched from inception to July 31, 2023. Studies involving unhealthy children, lacking males and females RIs/RCs, or limited to cord-blood RIs/RCs were excluded. Studies adhering to guidelines for RIs development from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and RCs studies reporting confidence intervals (CIs) were included in the meta-analysis. Lower and upper males and females RI limits were pooled for age groups with heterogeneity I2 < 75%. All studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the narrative synthesis. Sources of heterogeneity were analyzed using heatmaps, forest plots and Shiny app.

Results

Of 9123 studies screened, 177 were retained for full-text review. We identified 48 eligible studies (63 529 male and 59 969 female participants) from 25 countries (4 continents) published 1938–2023. There was inconsistency in age partitioning and length of age intervals. Meta-analysis was conducted on 13 studies reporting RIs and 2 studies reporting RCs. Pooled estimates for the 0–3 months age group could not be generated for males or females due to paucity of data. For children aged 3 months or older, both lower and upper RI limits generally increased with age, from approximately 100 to 130 g/L and from approximately 130 to 150 g/L, respectively. For visualisation of our narrative synthesis of all 48 studies, we created a novel web-based computational tool using Shiny-app. Sources of heterogeneity included child age, sex, analyser type and country. For many studies, the lower RIs were substantially different from WHO anaemia thresholds. Study limitations include a small sample size for younger age groups, potentially impacting heterogeneity estimates, reliance on CLSI guidelines due to the lack of a suitable quality assessment tool for RIs/RCs and restriction to English-language studies.

Conclusion

Evidence synthesis of locally developed Paediatric haemoglobin RIs/RCs revealed substantial heterogeneity, suggesting the need for more rigorously developed estimates that may be used globally along with WHO thresholds to define anaemia. Future research is needed on RIs for the youngest children. Percentile curves should be explored to provide continuous haemoglobin charts.

Abstract Image

使用直接方法估算儿科血红蛋白参考区间和曲线:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
血红蛋白是一种常用的实验室检测,用于评估个人和群体水平的健康状况。为了解释检测结果,实验室根据年龄和性别提供了下限(2.5%)和上限(97.5%)的参考区间(RIs)。参考曲线(rc)将年龄视为一个连续变量。目的是综合儿科血红蛋白RIs/RCs的证据,并调查异质性的可能来源。我们将研究结果置于世卫组织推荐的用于定义贫血的基于年龄和性别的血红蛋白阈值的背景下。方法:我们对发表儿科血红蛋白RIs/RCs的研究进行了系统回顾(PROSPERO: CRD42023399802)。检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE、SCOPUS和Cochrane电子图书馆,检索时间从建库到2023年7月31日。排除了涉及不健康儿童、缺乏男性和女性RIs/RCs或仅限于脐带血RIs/RCs的研究。遵循临床实验室标准协会(CLSI) RIs开发指南的研究和报告置信区间(ci)的rc研究被纳入meta分析。研究汇总了具有异质性的年龄组男性和女性RI上限的高低。结果:在筛选的9123项研究中,有177项被保留用于全文综述。我们从25个国家(4大洲)1938-2023年发表的48项符合条件的研究(63529名男性和59969名女性参与者)中筛选出。年龄划分和年龄间隔长度不一致。对13项报告RIs的研究和2项报告rc的研究进行meta分析。由于缺乏数据,无法对0-3个月年龄组的男性或女性进行汇总估计。对于3个月或更大的儿童,RI下限和上限通常随年龄增长而增加,分别从大约100到130 g/L和从大约130到150 g/L。为了可视化我们对所有48项研究的叙述综合,我们使用shine -app创建了一个新颖的基于网络的计算工具。异质性的来源包括儿童年龄、性别、分析者类型和国家。在许多研究中,较低的RIs与WHO的贫血阈值有很大不同。研究的局限性包括年轻年龄组的样本量小,可能影响异质性估计,由于缺乏合适的RIs/ rc质量评估工具而依赖于CLSI指南,以及对英语研究的限制。结论:当地开发的儿科血红蛋白RIs/RCs的证据综合显示了实质性的异质性,表明需要更严格的开发估计,可以与世卫组织的阈值一起在全球范围内使用来定义贫血。未来需要对最小儿童的RIs进行研究。应探索百分位曲线以提供连续的血红蛋白图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信