Safety and efficacy of ambulatory total knee arthroplasty with enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in well-selected patients aged 80 years and older.

Carol Xiaoshu Zhao, Kelvin Guoping Tan
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of ambulatory total knee arthroplasty with enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in well-selected patients aged 80 years and older.","authors":"Carol Xiaoshu Zhao, Kelvin Guoping Tan","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offers multiple benefits. However, there are concerns about whether old age should be a criterion for exclusion from this protocol. This study aimed to determine the safety and outcomes of ambulatory TKA for patients aged ≥80 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using data from our hospital knee registry database (2021-2024). We compared the length of hospital stay, complication rate, readmission rate, three-month postoperative functional outcomes and overall experiences of patients (aged ≥80 years) who underwent ambulatory TKA with patients (aged ≥80 years) who underwent non-ambulatory TKA and younger patients who underwent ambulatory TKA. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Clinical Score (KSS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS). The minimal clinically important difference cutoffs for OKS, KSFS and KSS were 5.0, 6.4 and 5.9, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were clinically significant improvements in the three-month postoperative functional scores compared to preoperative scores in all patient groups. Patients aged ≥80 years who underwent ambulatory TKA had lower complication and readmission rates compared to the other patient groups. They also had better three-month postoperative functional scores than patients who underwent non-ambulatory TKA ( P = 0.004 for OKS, P = 0.003 for KSFS), and similar outcomes as younger patients ( P > 0.050 for OKS, KSFS). Length of hospital stay, satisfaction rates and rates of expectation met were comparable between patients aged ≥80 years and younger patients who underwent ambulatory TKA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In carefully selected patients aged ≥80 years, ambulatory TKA is safe and yields outcomes comparable to those of younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offers multiple benefits. However, there are concerns about whether old age should be a criterion for exclusion from this protocol. This study aimed to determine the safety and outcomes of ambulatory TKA for patients aged ≥80 years.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from our hospital knee registry database (2021-2024). We compared the length of hospital stay, complication rate, readmission rate, three-month postoperative functional outcomes and overall experiences of patients (aged ≥80 years) who underwent ambulatory TKA with patients (aged ≥80 years) who underwent non-ambulatory TKA and younger patients who underwent ambulatory TKA. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Clinical Score (KSS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS). The minimal clinically important difference cutoffs for OKS, KSFS and KSS were 5.0, 6.4 and 5.9, respectively.

Results: There were clinically significant improvements in the three-month postoperative functional scores compared to preoperative scores in all patient groups. Patients aged ≥80 years who underwent ambulatory TKA had lower complication and readmission rates compared to the other patient groups. They also had better three-month postoperative functional scores than patients who underwent non-ambulatory TKA ( P = 0.004 for OKS, P = 0.003 for KSFS), and similar outcomes as younger patients ( P > 0.050 for OKS, KSFS). Length of hospital stay, satisfaction rates and rates of expectation met were comparable between patients aged ≥80 years and younger patients who underwent ambulatory TKA.

Conclusion: In carefully selected patients aged ≥80 years, ambulatory TKA is safe and yields outcomes comparable to those of younger patients.

在精心挑选的80岁及以上患者中,门诊全膝关节置换术提高术后恢复的安全性和有效性。
简介:全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后增强恢复方案提供了多种好处。然而,人们对是否应将老年作为排除在该议定书之外的标准表示关切。本研究旨在确定≥80岁患者门诊TKA的安全性和结果。方法:对我院膝关节登记数据库(2021-2024)的数据进行回顾性研究。我们比较了住院时间、并发症发生率、再入院率、术后3个月功能结局和患者(年龄≥80岁)门诊TKA患者、非门诊TKA患者和年轻门诊TKA患者(年龄≥80岁)的总体经历。功能结局采用牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、膝关节学会临床评分(KSS)和膝关节学会功能评分(KSFS)进行评估。OKS、KSFS和KSS的最小临床重要差异截止值分别为5.0、6.4和5.9。结果:与术前相比,所有患者组术后3个月功能评分均有临床显著改善。与其他患者组相比,年龄≥80岁的患者接受门诊TKA的并发症和再入院率较低。与接受非动态TKA的患者相比,他们的术后3个月功能评分更好(OKS为P = 0.004, KSFS为P = 0.003),与年轻患者的结果相似(OKS和KSFS为P = 0.050)。住院时间、满意度和预期满足率在≥80岁的患者和接受门诊TKA的年轻患者之间具有可比性。结论:在精心挑选的年龄≥80岁的患者中,动态TKA是安全的,其结果与年轻患者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信