Real-world outcomes of acellular fish skin grafts for chronic wounds: A retrospective analysis of effectiveness and costs.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Pavlo Dinter, Lina Weiss, Alexander A Navarini, Simon M Mueller
{"title":"Real-world outcomes of acellular fish skin grafts for chronic wounds: A retrospective analysis of effectiveness and costs.","authors":"Pavlo Dinter, Lina Weiss, Alexander A Navarini, Simon M Mueller","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic wounds (CW) are a major public health problem. Acellular fish skin grafts (AFSG) are increasingly used in advanced wound care, but data on their effectiveness and costs in real-world settings are scarce. We therefore retrospectively analysed the wound surface area (WSA), pain scores, and AFSG-related costs in patients with CW over a 12-week follow-up period. In this single-centre observational study, we analysed two datasets of 34 (full dataset) and 22 (WSA-dataset) CW patients treated with AFSG in a university hospital. Of 34 AFSG-treated patients (mean age 75.9 ± 11.4 years, 44.0% females) with 50 CW of various aetiologies (median ulcer duration 32 weeks), 66.6% experienced pain improvement at 12 weeks. Of 22 patients, 19 (86.4%) showed a mean reduction in WSA of -60.7% ± 143.8% (p = 0.0025); 36.4% of CW were healed. AFSG-related costs were 1232.3 EUR/patient and 130.4 EUR/reduced cm<sup>2</sup> (n = 22), which was 6.5 times more cost-effective compared to previous study results using living cellular skin substitutes. During 12 weeks of follow-up in a real-world setting, AFSG resulted in reduced WSA in most patients, improved pain in two-thirds, and healed CW in one-third. AFSG may be more cost-effective than other products, but prospective head-to-head comparisons are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 3","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic wounds (CW) are a major public health problem. Acellular fish skin grafts (AFSG) are increasingly used in advanced wound care, but data on their effectiveness and costs in real-world settings are scarce. We therefore retrospectively analysed the wound surface area (WSA), pain scores, and AFSG-related costs in patients with CW over a 12-week follow-up period. In this single-centre observational study, we analysed two datasets of 34 (full dataset) and 22 (WSA-dataset) CW patients treated with AFSG in a university hospital. Of 34 AFSG-treated patients (mean age 75.9 ± 11.4 years, 44.0% females) with 50 CW of various aetiologies (median ulcer duration 32 weeks), 66.6% experienced pain improvement at 12 weeks. Of 22 patients, 19 (86.4%) showed a mean reduction in WSA of -60.7% ± 143.8% (p = 0.0025); 36.4% of CW were healed. AFSG-related costs were 1232.3 EUR/patient and 130.4 EUR/reduced cm2 (n = 22), which was 6.5 times more cost-effective compared to previous study results using living cellular skin substitutes. During 12 weeks of follow-up in a real-world setting, AFSG resulted in reduced WSA in most patients, improved pain in two-thirds, and healed CW in one-third. AFSG may be more cost-effective than other products, but prospective head-to-head comparisons are needed.

无细胞鱼皮移植治疗慢性伤口的实际效果:有效性和成本的回顾性分析。
慢性伤口(CW)是一个主要的公共卫生问题。脱细胞鱼皮移植(AFSG)越来越多地用于高级伤口护理,但关于其在现实环境中的有效性和成本的数据很少。因此,我们在12周的随访期间回顾性分析了CW患者的伤口表面积(WSA)、疼痛评分和afsg相关费用。在这项单中心观察性研究中,我们分析了在一所大学医院接受AFSG治疗的34例(完整数据集)和22例(wsa数据集)CW患者的两个数据集。34例afsg治疗的患者(平均年龄75.9±11.4岁,女性44.0%),50例不同病因的CW(中位溃疡持续时间32周),66.6%的患者在12周时疼痛改善。22例患者中,19例(86.4%)WSA平均降低-60.7%±143.8% (p = 0.0025);36.4%的CW愈合。afsg相关成本为1232.3欧元/患者和130.4欧元/减少的平方厘米(n = 22),与先前使用活细胞皮肤替代品的研究结果相比,成本效益高6.5倍。在真实世界的12周随访中,AFSG导致大多数患者的WSA减少,三分之二的患者疼痛改善,三分之一的患者CW愈合。AFSG可能比其他产品更具成本效益,但需要进行前瞻性的正面比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信