How to reduce intraoperative preparation and docking time to minimal in a team with a robotic naïve surgical experience?

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_7_25
Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vasileios Tatanis, Arman Tsaturyan, Angelis Peteinaris, Solon Faitatziadis, Gabriel Faria-Costa, Kristiana Gkeka, Theodoros Spinos, Theofanis Vrettos, Abdurrahman Al-Aown, Jens-Uwe Stolzenbur, Evangelos Liatsikos
{"title":"How to reduce intraoperative preparation and docking time to minimal in a team with a robotic naïve surgical experience?","authors":"Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vasileios Tatanis, Arman Tsaturyan, Angelis Peteinaris, Solon Faitatziadis, Gabriel Faria-Costa, Kristiana Gkeka, Theodoros Spinos, Theofanis Vrettos, Abdurrahman Al-Aown, Jens-Uwe Stolzenbur, Evangelos Liatsikos","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_7_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of preoperative training in an experimental setting on the preparation and docking of the avatera robotic system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two different surgical groups (consisting of two nurses, one assistant, and one operating surgeon) attended an initial training on robot draping and docking procedures. Group 1 was involved in 10 robotic-assisted operations while Group 2 was trained in the dry lab using an artificial insufflated abdominal model (10 sessions). The decrease in time needed for docking and draping was evaluated. After the completion of the initial training, each group performed docking and draping procedures in five surgeries (including robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and pyeloplasty) and the recorded times were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, the docking and draping time were diminished during the initial training program from 17 to 7 min and from 12 to 5 min, respectively. In Group 2, the docking time was decreased from 9 to 6 min and the draping time from 8 to 5 min. Both types of training (during real-life OR program vs. dry laboratory setting inclusive an insufflated abdominal model) resulted in nearly the same positive training effect for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conducing a training of patient preparation and docking in the dry laboratory using an insufflated abdominal model facilitates experience acquisition in a safe and calm environment. The training method of Group 2 might help to avoid the potentially longer anesthesia times for patients during the early learning curve of Group 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_7_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of preoperative training in an experimental setting on the preparation and docking of the avatera robotic system.

Materials and methods: Two different surgical groups (consisting of two nurses, one assistant, and one operating surgeon) attended an initial training on robot draping and docking procedures. Group 1 was involved in 10 robotic-assisted operations while Group 2 was trained in the dry lab using an artificial insufflated abdominal model (10 sessions). The decrease in time needed for docking and draping was evaluated. After the completion of the initial training, each group performed docking and draping procedures in five surgeries (including robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and pyeloplasty) and the recorded times were compared.

Results: In Group 1, the docking and draping time were diminished during the initial training program from 17 to 7 min and from 12 to 5 min, respectively. In Group 2, the docking time was decreased from 9 to 6 min and the draping time from 8 to 5 min. Both types of training (during real-life OR program vs. dry laboratory setting inclusive an insufflated abdominal model) resulted in nearly the same positive training effect for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively.

Conclusions: Conducing a training of patient preparation and docking in the dry laboratory using an insufflated abdominal model facilitates experience acquisition in a safe and calm environment. The training method of Group 2 might help to avoid the potentially longer anesthesia times for patients during the early learning curve of Group 1.

在拥有机器人naïve手术经验的团队中,如何将术中准备和对接时间减少到最小?
目的:在实验环境下评估术前训练对avatera机器人系统制备和对接的影响。材料和方法:两个不同的手术组(由两名护士、一名助理和一名手术医生组成)参加了机器人悬垂和对接程序的初步培训。第1组进行10次机器人辅助手术,第2组在干燥实验室进行人工充气腹部模型训练(10次)。对对接和悬垂所需时间的减少进行了评估。初始训练完成后,各组分别进行5次手术(包括机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和肾盂成形术)的对接和悬垂手术,并比较记录的时间。结果:第1组在初始训练过程中,对接和悬垂时间分别从17分钟减少到7分钟和从12分钟减少到5分钟。在第2组中,对接时间从9分钟减少到6分钟,悬吊时间从8分钟减少到5分钟。两种类型的训练(在真实的手术室项目中与包括充气腹部模型的干燥实验室环境中)分别对第1组和第2组产生了几乎相同的积极训练效果。结论:在干燥实验室中使用充气腹部模型进行患者准备和对接训练,有助于在安全、平静的环境中获得经验。第二组的训练方法可能有助于避免患者在第一组的早期学习曲线中可能出现的较长的麻醉时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信