Advances in complex thinking and neurotechnologies in education: a bibliometric analysis of research trends.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jorge Sanabria-Z, Manuel Cebral-Loureda, Javier M Antelis, SeungHee Lee
{"title":"Advances in complex thinking and neurotechnologies in education: a bibliometric analysis of research trends.","authors":"Jorge Sanabria-Z, Manuel Cebral-Loureda, Javier M Antelis, SeungHee Lee","doi":"10.1007/s10339-025-01273-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroscience research to decode cognitive and emotional processes has been widely embraced in education. The development of methodologies, case studies, and new technologies have advanced our understanding of students' complex thinking. Despite these advancements, long-term analysis at the convergence of neurosciences, education, and complex thinking remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a bibliometric review using the prism method, spanning from 1960 to 2023 to map research trends, thematic evolutions, and future challenges. Our analysis of 3792 Scopus-indexed studies using advanced data visualization techniques yielded the following findings: (1) a predominant focus on critical thinking, with creativity driving innovative approaches that enhance problem-solving; (2) growing integration of neurotechnologies-such as EEG and neuroimaging-to assess and optimize cognitive engagement in educational settings; (3) an increasing emphasis on metacognition, highlighting its role as a reflective thinking strategy that fosters cogntive control and higher-order thinking; and (4) emerging research on executive functions, particularly their role in fostering decision-making and cognitive flexibility in learning environments. These findings contribute to the understanding of cognitive processes and inform practical applications in education, including the design of personalized learning strategies, real-time cognitive assessment tools, and neurotechnology-supported pedagogical models. The study advocates an interdisciplinary approach, integrating neuroscientific insights into complex thinking to enhance cognitive processing within STEAM education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47638,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Processing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Processing","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-025-01273-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuroscience research to decode cognitive and emotional processes has been widely embraced in education. The development of methodologies, case studies, and new technologies have advanced our understanding of students' complex thinking. Despite these advancements, long-term analysis at the convergence of neurosciences, education, and complex thinking remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a bibliometric review using the prism method, spanning from 1960 to 2023 to map research trends, thematic evolutions, and future challenges. Our analysis of 3792 Scopus-indexed studies using advanced data visualization techniques yielded the following findings: (1) a predominant focus on critical thinking, with creativity driving innovative approaches that enhance problem-solving; (2) growing integration of neurotechnologies-such as EEG and neuroimaging-to assess and optimize cognitive engagement in educational settings; (3) an increasing emphasis on metacognition, highlighting its role as a reflective thinking strategy that fosters cogntive control and higher-order thinking; and (4) emerging research on executive functions, particularly their role in fostering decision-making and cognitive flexibility in learning environments. These findings contribute to the understanding of cognitive processes and inform practical applications in education, including the design of personalized learning strategies, real-time cognitive assessment tools, and neurotechnology-supported pedagogical models. The study advocates an interdisciplinary approach, integrating neuroscientific insights into complex thinking to enhance cognitive processing within STEAM education.

复杂思维和神经技术在教育中的进展:研究趋势的文献计量学分析。
解码认知和情感过程的神经科学研究已广泛应用于教育领域。方法学、案例研究和新技术的发展提高了我们对学生复杂思维的理解。尽管取得了这些进步,神经科学、教育和复杂思维的长期分析仍然有限。为了解决这一差距,我们使用棱镜方法进行了文献计量学回顾,从1960年到2023年,绘制了研究趋势、主题演变和未来挑战。我们使用先进的数据可视化技术对3792项scopus索引研究进行了分析,得出以下发现:(1)主要关注批判性思维,创造力推动创新方法,提高解决问题的能力;(2)越来越多的神经技术整合,如脑电图和神经成像,以评估和优化教育环境中的认知参与;(3)越来越重视元认知,强调其作为一种促进认知控制和高阶思维的反思性思维策略的作用;(4)关于执行功能的新兴研究,特别是它们在促进学习环境中的决策和认知灵活性方面的作用。这些发现有助于理解认知过程,并为教育中的实际应用提供信息,包括个性化学习策略的设计、实时认知评估工具和神经技术支持的教学模型。该研究提倡跨学科的方法,将神经科学的见解整合到复杂的思维中,以增强STEAM教育中的认知处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes innovative contributions in the multidisciplinary field of cognitive science.  Its main purpose is to stimulate research and scientific interaction through communication between specialists in different fields on topics of common interest and to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary cognitive science. Cognitive Processing is articulated in the following sections:Cognitive DevelopmentCognitive Models of Risk and Decision MakingCognitive NeuroscienceCognitive PsychologyComputational Cognitive SciencesPhilosophy of MindNeuroimaging and Electrophysiological MethodsPsycholinguistics and Computational linguisticsQuantitative Psychology and Formal Theories in Cognitive ScienceSocial Cognition and Cognitive Science of Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信