Identification of phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among 8161 patients from 3 Spanish cohorts

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Òscar Miró , Olivier Peyrony , Joan Carles Trullàs , Aitor Alquézar-Arbé , Julio Núñez , Pedro López-Ayala , Javier Jacob , Héctor Bueno , Manuel Montero-Pérez-Barquero , José Carlos Arévalo-Lorido , Rafael de la Espriella , Gema Miñana , Juan Sanchis , Pere Llorens
{"title":"Identification of phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among 8161 patients from 3 Spanish cohorts","authors":"Òscar Miró ,&nbsp;Olivier Peyrony ,&nbsp;Joan Carles Trullàs ,&nbsp;Aitor Alquézar-Arbé ,&nbsp;Julio Núñez ,&nbsp;Pedro López-Ayala ,&nbsp;Javier Jacob ,&nbsp;Héctor Bueno ,&nbsp;Manuel Montero-Pérez-Barquero ,&nbsp;José Carlos Arévalo-Lorido ,&nbsp;Rafael de la Espriella ,&nbsp;Gema Miñana ,&nbsp;Juan Sanchis ,&nbsp;Pere Llorens","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>To identify phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), compare mortality, and investigate whether treatments have different effects according to phenotype.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a secondary analysis of 8161 patients with HFpEF included in Spanish cardiology (INCLIVA), internal medicine (RICA), and emergency (EAHFE) registries. Phenotypic clusters based on 16 baseline characteristics were identified using latent class analysis. We analyzed crude and treatment-adjusted 1-year survival, the associations between each treatment and mortality, and their interactions with phenotype.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 4 distinct clusters. One-year mortality was 18.7%. Cluster 4 (younger women with a valvular heart disease phenotype) had the lowest mortality (13.7%; reference category), which increased progressively in cluster 2 (cardiometabolic phenotype; mortality: 15.7%; adjusted HR, 1.28; 95%<span>C</span>I, 1.06-1.54), cluster 3 (very elderly female phenotype; mortality: 20.4%; adjusted HR, 1.63; 95%CI, 1.40-1.90), and cluster 1 (male phenotype with cardiomyopathy; mortality: 24.0%; adjusted HR, 1.81; 95%CI, 1.53-2.13). The results were very similar when each registry was analyzed individually. Treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors was associated with better survival in all clusters, beta-blockers were beneficial in cluster 1, and anticoagulants in cluster 4. However, none of the treatments show</div><div>ed a differential association with prognosis according to phenotype.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study defines 4 HFpEF phenotypes with significantly different prognoses. Among the treatments analyzed, only renin-angiotensin system inhibitors seemed to have a generalized survival benefit, and none demonstrated a differential effect based on phenotype.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":"78 10","pages":"Pages 896-905"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585725001239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

To identify phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), compare mortality, and investigate whether treatments have different effects according to phenotype.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of 8161 patients with HFpEF included in Spanish cardiology (INCLIVA), internal medicine (RICA), and emergency (EAHFE) registries. Phenotypic clusters based on 16 baseline characteristics were identified using latent class analysis. We analyzed crude and treatment-adjusted 1-year survival, the associations between each treatment and mortality, and their interactions with phenotype.

Results

We identified 4 distinct clusters. One-year mortality was 18.7%. Cluster 4 (younger women with a valvular heart disease phenotype) had the lowest mortality (13.7%; reference category), which increased progressively in cluster 2 (cardiometabolic phenotype; mortality: 15.7%; adjusted HR, 1.28; 95%CI, 1.06-1.54), cluster 3 (very elderly female phenotype; mortality: 20.4%; adjusted HR, 1.63; 95%CI, 1.40-1.90), and cluster 1 (male phenotype with cardiomyopathy; mortality: 24.0%; adjusted HR, 1.81; 95%CI, 1.53-2.13). The results were very similar when each registry was analyzed individually. Treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors was associated with better survival in all clusters, beta-blockers were beneficial in cluster 1, and anticoagulants in cluster 4. However, none of the treatments show
ed a differential association with prognosis according to phenotype.

Conclusions

This study defines 4 HFpEF phenotypes with significantly different prognoses. Among the treatments analyzed, only renin-angiotensin system inhibitors seemed to have a generalized survival benefit, and none demonstrated a differential effect based on phenotype.
来自3个西班牙队列的8161例保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者的表型鉴定
前言和目的确定具有保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭的表型,比较死亡率,并研究治疗是否根据表型有不同的效果。方法:我们对西班牙心脏病学(INCLIVA)、内科(RICA)和急诊(EAHFE)登记的8161例HFpEF患者进行了二次分析。基于16个基线特征的表型聚类通过潜在类分析确定。我们分析了粗生存率和治疗调整后的1年生存率,每种治疗与死亡率之间的关系,以及它们与表型的相互作用。结果鉴定出4个不同的聚类。一年死亡率为18.7%。第4组(有瓣膜性心脏病表型的年轻女性)死亡率最低(13.7%;参考类别),在集群2(心脏代谢表型;死亡率:15.7%;调整后的HR为1.28;95%CI, 1.06-1.54),聚类3(非常老年女性表型;死亡率:20.4%;调整后的HR为1.63;95%CI, 1.40-1.90),聚类1(男性心肺表型;死亡率:24.0%;调整后的HR为1.81;95%可信区间,1.53 - -2.13)。当单独分析每个注册表时,结果非常相似。肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂治疗与所有组的更好生存率相关,β受体阻滞剂在组1中有益,抗凝剂在组4中有益。然而,根据表型,没有一种治疗方法显示出与预后的差异关联。结论本研究定义了4种具有显著预后差异的HFpEF表型。在分析的治疗方法中,只有肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂似乎具有普遍的生存益处,没有一种显示出基于表型的差异效应。完整的英文文本可从:www.revespcardiol.org/en。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信