Effectiveness of telepsychiatry interventions for youth with depressive and/or anxiety disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2
Clinical child psychology and psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1177/13591045251338475
Elaine Tian, Margaret Kay Ho, Oscar Hou In Chou, Samantha Chong, Chi Ting Kwan, Athene Hoi-Ying Lam, Kai-Tai Chan
{"title":"Effectiveness of telepsychiatry interventions for youth with depressive and/or anxiety disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Elaine Tian, Margaret Kay Ho, Oscar Hou In Chou, Samantha Chong, Chi Ting Kwan, Athene Hoi-Ying Lam, Kai-Tai Chan","doi":"10.1177/13591045251338475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveSince the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of anxiety and depression in youth have risen. Telepsychiatry is a potential mode of intervention for such digital natives. This systematic review aims to examine the effectiveness of telepsychiatry for youth with depression and/or anxiety.MethodsFour electronic databases, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, were searched from their inception to May 12, 2024. Included studies were assessed for study quality and risk of bias.ResultsA search returning 29,944 records yielded 26 included studies, comprising 1,558 youths. Of 13 studies comparing depressive symptoms pre- and post-telepsychiatry intervention, symptom severity was significantly lower post-intervention compared to baseline (Hedges' g: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.08). Similarly, of six studies comparing pre- and post-telepsychiatry intervention anxiety symptoms, anxiety scores were significantly lower post-intervention (Hedges' g: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.50). Patients undergoing telepsychiatry also had superior outcomes when compared to waitlist control groups for depression (Hedges' g: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.85) but not anxiety (Hedges' g: 0.50; 95% CI: -0.09, 1.10). Certainty of these estimates ranged from moderate to very low. Qualitative feedback noted subjective improvement in symptoms and high levels of satisfaction.ConclusionTelepsychiatry has potential as a therapeutic intervention for youth anxiety and depression. Further research with more controlled methodology is needed for development of recommendations that can guide growing use of this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93938,"journal":{"name":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"537-561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251338475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveSince the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of anxiety and depression in youth have risen. Telepsychiatry is a potential mode of intervention for such digital natives. This systematic review aims to examine the effectiveness of telepsychiatry for youth with depression and/or anxiety.MethodsFour electronic databases, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, were searched from their inception to May 12, 2024. Included studies were assessed for study quality and risk of bias.ResultsA search returning 29,944 records yielded 26 included studies, comprising 1,558 youths. Of 13 studies comparing depressive symptoms pre- and post-telepsychiatry intervention, symptom severity was significantly lower post-intervention compared to baseline (Hedges' g: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.08). Similarly, of six studies comparing pre- and post-telepsychiatry intervention anxiety symptoms, anxiety scores were significantly lower post-intervention (Hedges' g: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.50). Patients undergoing telepsychiatry also had superior outcomes when compared to waitlist control groups for depression (Hedges' g: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.85) but not anxiety (Hedges' g: 0.50; 95% CI: -0.09, 1.10). Certainty of these estimates ranged from moderate to very low. Qualitative feedback noted subjective improvement in symptoms and high levels of satisfaction.ConclusionTelepsychiatry has potential as a therapeutic intervention for youth anxiety and depression. Further research with more controlled methodology is needed for development of recommendations that can guide growing use of this technology.

远程精神病学干预对青少年抑郁症和/或焦虑症的有效性:荟萃分析的系统回顾。
自2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行爆发以来,青少年焦虑和抑郁的比例有所上升。远程精神病学对这些数字原生代来说是一种潜在的干预模式。本系统综述旨在检查远程精神病学对患有抑郁症和/或焦虑症的青少年的有效性。方法检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 4个电子数据库自建库至2024年5月12日。对纳入的研究进行研究质量和偏倚风险评估。结果一项返回29,944条记录的搜索产生了26项纳入的研究,其中包括1,558名年轻人。在13项比较远程精神病学干预前和干预后抑郁症状的研究中,干预后症状严重程度显著低于基线(Hedges’g: 0.83;95% ci: 0.59, 1.08)。同样,在六项比较远程精神病学干预前和干预后焦虑症状的研究中,干预后的焦虑得分显著降低(赫奇斯g: 1.15;95% ci: 0.79, 1.50)。与等候名单对照组相比,接受远程精神病学治疗的患者也有更好的结果(Hedges' g: 0.54;95% CI: 0.23, 0.85),但没有焦虑(Hedges' g: 0.50;95% ci: -0.09, 1.10)。这些估计的确定性从中等到非常低。定性反馈指出症状的主观改善和高水平的满意度。结论远程精神病学在青少年焦虑抑郁的干预治疗中具有一定的潜力。需要用更有控制的方法进行进一步的研究,以制定可以指导日益使用该技术的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信