Predicting survival in small cell lung cancer patients undergoing various treatments: a machine learning approach.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2025-03-31 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-331
Ziran Zhao, Xi Cheng, Yibo Gao, Fengwei Tan, Qi Xue, Shugeng Gao, Jie He
{"title":"Predicting survival in small cell lung cancer patients undergoing various treatments: a machine learning approach.","authors":"Ziran Zhao, Xi Cheng, Yibo Gao, Fengwei Tan, Qi Xue, Shugeng Gao, Jie He","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly metastatic, accounting for 1.796 million global cancer-related deaths in 2020, with no established standard care. This study aimed to assess treatment effects on SCLC patient survival across stages and develop a machine learning-based survival prediction tool for accurate overall survival (OS) estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed four prediction models: Cox proportional hazard (Cox PH) regression, survival tree (ST), random survival forest (RSF), and gradient boosting survival analysis (GBSA). Patients were randomly split 7:3 into training and test datasets, with 10-fold cross-validation and 50 iterations on the training dataset. Cox PH used hazard ratios, while the other models employed importance values to assess feature predictiveness. Harrell's C-index (C-index) and Brier score (BS) measured model performance, with internal validations using R version 4.2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cox PH outperformed others based on mean C-index and BS. Multivariate analysis across models highlighted distant metastases (M category), tumor stage, and treatment modalities (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery) as key survival predictors. Stratified Cox PH analysis revealed surgery's efficacy in early-stage SCLC (stage II) and radiotherapy's advantage in stage III. Homogeneity was observed in chemotherapy benefits across cancer stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are integral in SCLC treatment, contingent on cancer stage and characteristics. Surgery offers promise for early-stage cases, while advanced-stage strategies require further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 3","pages":"736-748"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly metastatic, accounting for 1.796 million global cancer-related deaths in 2020, with no established standard care. This study aimed to assess treatment effects on SCLC patient survival across stages and develop a machine learning-based survival prediction tool for accurate overall survival (OS) estimation.

Methods: We developed four prediction models: Cox proportional hazard (Cox PH) regression, survival tree (ST), random survival forest (RSF), and gradient boosting survival analysis (GBSA). Patients were randomly split 7:3 into training and test datasets, with 10-fold cross-validation and 50 iterations on the training dataset. Cox PH used hazard ratios, while the other models employed importance values to assess feature predictiveness. Harrell's C-index (C-index) and Brier score (BS) measured model performance, with internal validations using R version 4.2.0.

Results: Cox PH outperformed others based on mean C-index and BS. Multivariate analysis across models highlighted distant metastases (M category), tumor stage, and treatment modalities (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery) as key survival predictors. Stratified Cox PH analysis revealed surgery's efficacy in early-stage SCLC (stage II) and radiotherapy's advantage in stage III. Homogeneity was observed in chemotherapy benefits across cancer stages.

Conclusions: Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are integral in SCLC treatment, contingent on cancer stage and characteristics. Surgery offers promise for early-stage cases, while advanced-stage strategies require further exploration.

预测接受各种治疗的小细胞肺癌患者的生存:一种机器学习方法。
背景:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)具有高度转移性,在2020年全球癌症相关死亡中占179.6万例,没有既定的标准治疗。本研究旨在评估治疗对SCLC患者分期生存的影响,并开发一种基于机器学习的生存预测工具,以准确估计总生存(OS)。方法:建立4种预测模型:Cox比例风险(Cox PH)回归、生存树(ST)、随机生存森林(RSF)和梯度增强生存分析(GBSA)。将患者按7:3随机分成训练和测试数据集,在训练数据集上进行10倍交叉验证和50次迭代。Cox PH使用风险比,而其他模型使用重要性值来评估特征的预测性。Harrell's C-index (C-index)和Brier score (BS)衡量模型的性能,并使用R 4.2.0版本进行内部验证。结果:Cox PH在平均c指数和BS上优于其他患者。跨模型的多变量分析强调远处转移(M类)、肿瘤分期和治疗方式(放疗、化疗、手术)是关键的生存预测因素。分层Cox PH分析显示手术对早期SCLC (II期)有效,而放疗对III期有优势。在不同癌症分期的化疗获益中观察到同质性。结论:手术、化疗和放疗是SCLC治疗中不可或缺的一部分,取决于癌症的分期和特征。手术为早期病例提供了希望,而晚期策略需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信