First Impressions Towards Autistic People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1002/aur.70019
Lashindri C. Wanigasekera, Murray T. Maybery, Romina Palermo, Andrew J. O. Whitehouse, Diana Weiting Tan
{"title":"First Impressions Towards Autistic People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lashindri C. Wanigasekera,&nbsp;Murray T. Maybery,&nbsp;Romina Palermo,&nbsp;Andrew J. O. Whitehouse,&nbsp;Diana Weiting Tan","doi":"10.1002/aur.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emerging evidence suggests that observers tend to form less favorable first impressions toward autistic people than toward non-autistic people. These negative impressions may be associated with immediate behavioral responses, as well as long-lasting attitudes toward those being observed that may negatively impact their psychosocial wellbeing. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the existing literature that has compared first impressions toward autistic and non-autistic people to investigate whether first impressions are influenced by: (1) type of first impression measure, (2) modality of stimulus presentation, and (3) characteristics of the observers and/or stimulus participants. Key inclusion criteria were: (1) one or more groups of observers provided first impression ratings, (2) the stimuli were presented in either audio-only, video-only, audio–video, still image, or speech transcript format, and (3) first impressions toward autistic and non-autistic individuals were compared. A systematic search identified a final sample of 21 articles, which included 221 effects for analyses. Findings showed that first impressions were generally less favorable for autistic compared to non-autistic people across all presentation modalities other than speech transcript, with effect sizes typically moderate to large. Differences in first impressions toward autistic and non-autistic people were generally more pronounced for ratings of interpersonal attraction and social and communication presentation, rather than for ratings of psychological and personality traits. There was also some evidence that characteristics of non-autistic observers, such as autism knowledge and quality of contact with autistic people, impact first impressions. These findings provide insight into the critical role first impressions play in influencing social interaction between autistic and non-autistic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 5","pages":"983-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that observers tend to form less favorable first impressions toward autistic people than toward non-autistic people. These negative impressions may be associated with immediate behavioral responses, as well as long-lasting attitudes toward those being observed that may negatively impact their psychosocial wellbeing. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the existing literature that has compared first impressions toward autistic and non-autistic people to investigate whether first impressions are influenced by: (1) type of first impression measure, (2) modality of stimulus presentation, and (3) characteristics of the observers and/or stimulus participants. Key inclusion criteria were: (1) one or more groups of observers provided first impression ratings, (2) the stimuli were presented in either audio-only, video-only, audio–video, still image, or speech transcript format, and (3) first impressions toward autistic and non-autistic individuals were compared. A systematic search identified a final sample of 21 articles, which included 221 effects for analyses. Findings showed that first impressions were generally less favorable for autistic compared to non-autistic people across all presentation modalities other than speech transcript, with effect sizes typically moderate to large. Differences in first impressions toward autistic and non-autistic people were generally more pronounced for ratings of interpersonal attraction and social and communication presentation, rather than for ratings of psychological and personality traits. There was also some evidence that characteristics of non-autistic observers, such as autism knowledge and quality of contact with autistic people, impact first impressions. These findings provide insight into the critical role first impressions play in influencing social interaction between autistic and non-autistic individuals.

对自闭症患者的第一印象:系统回顾与元分析。
越来越多的证据表明,观察者对自闭症患者的第一印象往往不如对非自闭症患者的第一印象好。这些负面印象可能与即时的行为反应有关,也可能与对观察到的人的长期态度有关,这可能会对他们的社会心理健康产生负面影响。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了现有的文献,比较了自闭症和非自闭症患者的第一印象,以探讨第一印象是否受到:(1)第一印象测量类型,(2)刺激呈现方式,以及(3)观察者和/或刺激参与者的特征的影响。主要入选标准是:(1)一组或多组观察者提供第一印象评分;(2)刺激以纯音频、纯视频、音频-视频、静止图像或语音文本格式呈现;(3)对自闭症和非自闭症个体的第一印象进行比较。系统搜索确定了21篇文章的最终样本,其中包括221个用于分析的效应。研究结果表明,除了语音记录外,自闭症患者的第一印象通常不如非自闭症患者,其效应量通常为中等到较大。对自闭症患者和非自闭症患者的第一印象的差异通常在人际吸引力和社交和沟通表现的评分上更为明显,而不是在心理和人格特征的评分上。还有一些证据表明,非自闭症观察者的特征,如自闭症知识和与自闭症患者接触的质量,会影响第一印象。这些发现为第一印象在影响自闭症和非自闭症个体之间的社会互动中所起的关键作用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信