Effects of replacing antibiotics with probiotics and antimicrobial peptides on performance, gut health, carcass traits, meat quality, and welfare in broilers infected with Eimeria and Clostridium perfringens.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Muhammad Muneeb, Ehsaan Ullah Khan, Mubashar Ali, Muhammad Suleman, Muhammad Shabir Shaheen, Muhammad Shahbaz Zafar, Sohail Ahmad
{"title":"Effects of replacing antibiotics with probiotics and antimicrobial peptides on performance, gut health, carcass traits, meat quality, and welfare in broilers infected with Eimeria and Clostridium perfringens.","authors":"Muhammad Muneeb, Ehsaan Ullah Khan, Mubashar Ali, Muhammad Suleman, Muhammad Shabir Shaheen, Muhammad Shahbaz Zafar, Sohail Ahmad","doi":"10.1007/s11250-025-04441-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of antibiotic, probiotic, and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) supplements in mitigating adverse consequences of necrotic enteritis (NE) in broilers. In total, 720 one-day-old (Ross-308) male broiler chicks were randomly assigned to five distinct feeding regimens (each treatment consisting of six replicates of 24 birds) including: (1) negative control (NC), fed only basal diet; (2) positive control (PC); with C. perfringens challenge + basal diet; (3) CP-Ab: challenged + virginiamycin (Stafac® 500) at 200 g/ton, (4) CP-Pro: challenged + 200 g/ton B. subtilis PB6 (Clostat dry®) probiotic additive, and (5) CP-LS2: challenged and fed an antimicrobial peptide (LassoTide Plus®) at 200 g/ton. The NE challenge was induced by administering 10X coccidia vaccine on day 15 followed by inoculation with a pathogenic field strain of C. perfringens type G (1 × 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml/ bird; 1 ml) on days 19 and 20 through oral gavage. Feeding AMP and probiotic to the NE-affected broilers resulted in 23.93% and 19.70% respectively higher body weight gain and 76.59% and 70.27% lower mortality compared to the PC. Similarly, supplementation with AMP improved (P < 0.05) gut morphology, carcass yield (5.82%), meat water holding capacity (14.73%), and reduced cooking loss (10.01%), dripping loss (20.87%), and shear force (25%) as compared to the PC. Additionally, the excreta score, litter quality and welfare attributes were significantly ameliorated (P < 0.05) with AMP addition. In conclusion, the findings suggest that AMP outperformed both virginiamycin and probiotic, demonstrating its potential as a superior substitute for AGPs in broilers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":"57 4","pages":"184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04441-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of antibiotic, probiotic, and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) supplements in mitigating adverse consequences of necrotic enteritis (NE) in broilers. In total, 720 one-day-old (Ross-308) male broiler chicks were randomly assigned to five distinct feeding regimens (each treatment consisting of six replicates of 24 birds) including: (1) negative control (NC), fed only basal diet; (2) positive control (PC); with C. perfringens challenge + basal diet; (3) CP-Ab: challenged + virginiamycin (Stafac® 500) at 200 g/ton, (4) CP-Pro: challenged + 200 g/ton B. subtilis PB6 (Clostat dry®) probiotic additive, and (5) CP-LS2: challenged and fed an antimicrobial peptide (LassoTide Plus®) at 200 g/ton. The NE challenge was induced by administering 10X coccidia vaccine on day 15 followed by inoculation with a pathogenic field strain of C. perfringens type G (1 × 108 CFU/ml/ bird; 1 ml) on days 19 and 20 through oral gavage. Feeding AMP and probiotic to the NE-affected broilers resulted in 23.93% and 19.70% respectively higher body weight gain and 76.59% and 70.27% lower mortality compared to the PC. Similarly, supplementation with AMP improved (P < 0.05) gut morphology, carcass yield (5.82%), meat water holding capacity (14.73%), and reduced cooking loss (10.01%), dripping loss (20.87%), and shear force (25%) as compared to the PC. Additionally, the excreta score, litter quality and welfare attributes were significantly ameliorated (P < 0.05) with AMP addition. In conclusion, the findings suggest that AMP outperformed both virginiamycin and probiotic, demonstrating its potential as a superior substitute for AGPs in broilers.

益生菌和抗菌肽替代抗生素对艾美耳球虫和产气荚膜梭菌感染肉鸡生产性能、肠道健康、胴体性状、肉品质和福利的影响
本研究评估了抗生素、益生菌和抗菌肽(AMP)补充剂在减轻肉仔鸡坏死性肠炎(NE)不良后果方面的效果。试验选用720只1日龄(Ross-308)雄性肉仔鸡,随机分为5个不同的饲喂方案(每个处理包括6个重复,每重复24只鸡),其中:(1)阴性对照(NC),仅饲喂基础饲粮;(2)阳性对照(PC);产气荚膜梭菌攻毒+基础日粮;(3) CP-Ab:攻毒+维吉尼霉素(Stafac®500)200 g/吨,(4)CP-Pro:攻毒+ 200 g/吨枯草芽孢杆菌PB6 (Clostat dry®)益生菌添加剂,(5)CP-LS2:攻毒并饲喂200 g/吨的抗菌肽(LassoTide Plus®)。在第15天接种10X球虫疫苗,然后接种G型产气荚膜荚膜球菌病原野株(1 × 108 CFU/ml/只;1 ml),于第19天和第20天灌胃。与PC相比,饲喂AMP和益生菌的肉鸡增重分别提高23.93%和19.70%,死亡率分别降低76.59%和70.27%。同样,添加AMP可改善(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信