Reasons for Leaving Sober Living Houses and Their Associations with Substance Use, Psychiatric, and Housing Outcomes.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2025.2487992
Douglas L Polcin, Elizabeth Mahoney, Meenakshi Subbaraman, Amy A Mericle
{"title":"Reasons for Leaving Sober Living Houses and Their Associations with Substance Use, Psychiatric, and Housing Outcomes.","authors":"Douglas L Polcin, Elizabeth Mahoney, Meenakshi Subbaraman, Amy A Mericle","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2487992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sober living houses (SLHs) offer abstinence-based housing for individuals with alcohol or drug problems. Research shows residents of SLHs make improvements on measures of substance use and other problems. Length of stay (LOS) in the house is associated with outcomes. However, little is known about the reasons residents leave houses or how reasons are associated with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline interviews were conducted with individuals entering 48 SLHs in Los Angeles. Residents who left within 12 months completed a 12-month follow-up interview (<i>N</i> = 352) assessing reasons they left, abstinence, psychiatric symptoms, and housing status. Multilevel regression models assessed relationships between reasons and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly cited reason for leaving was wanting to live on one's own or in a shared living situation with family or friends (45.7%), which was associated with increased odds of abstinence and fewer psychiatric symptoms. Leaving due to not liking something about the house (e.g., rules or living conditions) was the second most commonly cited reason for leaving (28.1%), but was not associated with any outcomes. Wanting to live on one's own and did not get along with residents or the house manager were associated with favorable housing (i.e., stable housing or a different SLH).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Residents who leave SLHs to live more independently in the community may be better prepared than residents who leave for other reasons. Some residents may benefit from seeking stable housing in the community or in another SLH if they are not a good match for their current house.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":"60 8","pages":"1148-1156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2487992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sober living houses (SLHs) offer abstinence-based housing for individuals with alcohol or drug problems. Research shows residents of SLHs make improvements on measures of substance use and other problems. Length of stay (LOS) in the house is associated with outcomes. However, little is known about the reasons residents leave houses or how reasons are associated with outcomes.

Methods: Baseline interviews were conducted with individuals entering 48 SLHs in Los Angeles. Residents who left within 12 months completed a 12-month follow-up interview (N = 352) assessing reasons they left, abstinence, psychiatric symptoms, and housing status. Multilevel regression models assessed relationships between reasons and outcomes.

Results: The most commonly cited reason for leaving was wanting to live on one's own or in a shared living situation with family or friends (45.7%), which was associated with increased odds of abstinence and fewer psychiatric symptoms. Leaving due to not liking something about the house (e.g., rules or living conditions) was the second most commonly cited reason for leaving (28.1%), but was not associated with any outcomes. Wanting to live on one's own and did not get along with residents or the house manager were associated with favorable housing (i.e., stable housing or a different SLH).

Conclusion: Residents who leave SLHs to live more independently in the community may be better prepared than residents who leave for other reasons. Some residents may benefit from seeking stable housing in the community or in another SLH if they are not a good match for their current house.

离开清醒生活之家的原因及其与物质使用、精神病学和住房结果的关系。
背景:清醒生活之家(SLHs)为有酒精或毒品问题的个人提供基于禁欲的住房。研究表明,slh的居民在药物使用和其他问题上取得了进步。在家里呆的时间长短与结果有关。然而,人们对居民离开家园的原因以及这些原因与结果之间的关系知之甚少。方法:对进入洛杉矶48家slh的个体进行基线访谈。在12个月内离开的居民完成了12个月的随访访谈(N = 352),评估他们离开的原因、禁欲、精神症状和住房状况。多水平回归模型评估了原因和结果之间的关系。结果:最常见的离开原因是想要独自生活或与家人或朋友共享生活环境(45.7%),这与禁欲几率增加和精神症状减少有关。由于不喜欢房子的某些东西(例如,规则或生活条件)而离开是第二大最常见的离开原因(28.1%),但与任何结果无关。想要独自生活,与居民或房屋经理相处不好的人与有利的住房(即稳定的住房或不同的SLH)有关。结论:离开slh的居民可能比其他原因离开的居民在社区中更独立地生活。有些住户若不适合现时的房屋,可到社区或另一间独立屋寻求稳定的房屋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信