Linked lives: Dyadic trajectories of cognitive function among middle-aged and older couples.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Dexia Kong, Xiaomin Li, Yaxin Lan, Emma Zang
{"title":"Linked lives: Dyadic trajectories of cognitive function among middle-aged and older couples.","authors":"Dexia Kong, Xiaomin Li, Yaxin Lan, Emma Zang","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study is among the first to analyze the developmental trajectories of cognitive function at the couple level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using longitudinal dyadic data obtained from 2,130 heterosexual couples who participated in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study between 2011 and 2020, we employed the dyadic latent growth curve model to analyze the developmental trajectories of wives' and husbands' cognitive function from 2011 to 2018. We examined the significant predictors of membership of the latent profiles, as well as the extent to which membership of the latent profiles predicted husbands' and wives' depressive symptoms at follow-up (i.e., in 2018 and 2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two identified dyadic profiles reflected distinct developmental trajectories at the couple level: high stable couples with outperforming husbands (Profile 1, 81.6% of couples), and moderate stable wives-moderate rapid decline husbands (Profile 2, 18.4% of couples). Husbands' older age and higher number of functional limitations, and couples' residence in rural areas at baseline predicted a higher likelihood of membership in Profile 2. Husbands reporting more chronic conditions at baseline predicted a lower likelihood of the couple being classified in Profile 2. Couples in Profile 2 exhibited higher levels of depression symptoms than their counterparts in Profile 1 in 2018 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results highlight the utility of a couple approach in analyzing the developmental trajectories of cognitive functioning in later life and advance our understanding of how couple-level changes exert influence on both spouses' mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Our study is among the first to analyze the developmental trajectories of cognitive function at the couple level.

Methods: Using longitudinal dyadic data obtained from 2,130 heterosexual couples who participated in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study between 2011 and 2020, we employed the dyadic latent growth curve model to analyze the developmental trajectories of wives' and husbands' cognitive function from 2011 to 2018. We examined the significant predictors of membership of the latent profiles, as well as the extent to which membership of the latent profiles predicted husbands' and wives' depressive symptoms at follow-up (i.e., in 2018 and 2020).

Results: The two identified dyadic profiles reflected distinct developmental trajectories at the couple level: high stable couples with outperforming husbands (Profile 1, 81.6% of couples), and moderate stable wives-moderate rapid decline husbands (Profile 2, 18.4% of couples). Husbands' older age and higher number of functional limitations, and couples' residence in rural areas at baseline predicted a higher likelihood of membership in Profile 2. Husbands reporting more chronic conditions at baseline predicted a lower likelihood of the couple being classified in Profile 2. Couples in Profile 2 exhibited higher levels of depression symptoms than their counterparts in Profile 1 in 2018 and 2020.

Discussion: Our results highlight the utility of a couple approach in analyzing the developmental trajectories of cognitive functioning in later life and advance our understanding of how couple-level changes exert influence on both spouses' mental health.

关联生活:中老年夫妇认知功能的二元轨迹。
目的:我们的研究是第一个在夫妻层面上分析认知功能发展轨迹的研究。方法:利用2011 - 2020年参与中国健康与退休纵向研究的2130对异性恋夫妇的纵向二元数据,采用二元潜在增长曲线模型分析2011 - 2018年夫妻认知功能的发展轨迹。我们研究了潜在特征成员的重要预测因素,以及潜在特征成员在随访期间(即2018年和2020年)预测丈夫和妻子抑郁症状的程度。结果:这两种二元特征在夫妻层面上反映了不同的发展轨迹:高度稳定的夫妻与表现出色的丈夫(特征1,81.6%的夫妻);中度稳定的妻子-中度快速衰退的丈夫(特征2,18.4%的夫妻)。在基线时,丈夫年龄较大、功能受限次数较多、夫妇居住在农村地区预示着更有可能成为剖面2的成员。在基线时报告慢性病较多的丈夫预示着这对夫妇被分类为概况2的可能性较低。2018年和2020年,资料2中的夫妇比资料1中的夫妇表现出更高的抑郁症状。讨论:我们的研究结果强调了夫妻方法在分析晚年认知功能发展轨迹中的效用,并促进了我们对夫妻层面的变化如何影响配偶双方心理健康的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信