Atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in cancer: the latest scientific evidence, current management, and future directions.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lakshya Seth, Nickolas Stabellini, Shawn Doss, Vraj Patel, Viraj Shah, Gregory Lip, Susan Dent, Michael G Fradley, Lars Køber, Avirup Guha
{"title":"Atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in cancer: the latest scientific evidence, current management, and future directions.","authors":"Lakshya Seth, Nickolas Stabellini, Shawn Doss, Vraj Patel, Viraj Shah, Gregory Lip, Susan Dent, Michael G Fradley, Lars Køber, Avirup Guha","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03104-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. Atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke are major cardiovascular complications in cancer patients, who have a higher burden and worse outcomes than the general population. Clinical risk stratification scores for stroke and bleeding, commonly used in the general population to estimate thromboembolic and bleeding risk, respectively, are less well validated in cancer patients, who have historically been excluded in clinical trials. There is a lack of consensus opinion on how to effectively risk-stratify cancer patients based on the currently available tools and a need for cancer-specific scores that offer a tailored approach to each patient in order to more effectively stratify ischemic stroke and bleeding risk in this cohort of patients. Cancer-mediated physiologic changes and adverse effects of antineoplastic therapy have been implicated as etiologies of the increased risk for both atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Risk stratifying scores such as CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc and HAS-BLED, commonly used in the general population, are less well validated in cancer patients. There is a need for cancer-specific scores that can more effectively stratify ischemic stroke and bleeding risk in cancer patients, although given the heterogeneity of cancers, whether a \"one score fits all\" is uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03104-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. Atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke are major cardiovascular complications in cancer patients, who have a higher burden and worse outcomes than the general population. Clinical risk stratification scores for stroke and bleeding, commonly used in the general population to estimate thromboembolic and bleeding risk, respectively, are less well validated in cancer patients, who have historically been excluded in clinical trials. There is a lack of consensus opinion on how to effectively risk-stratify cancer patients based on the currently available tools and a need for cancer-specific scores that offer a tailored approach to each patient in order to more effectively stratify ischemic stroke and bleeding risk in this cohort of patients. Cancer-mediated physiologic changes and adverse effects of antineoplastic therapy have been implicated as etiologies of the increased risk for both atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Risk stratifying scores such as CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED, commonly used in the general population, are less well validated in cancer patients. There is a need for cancer-specific scores that can more effectively stratify ischemic stroke and bleeding risk in cancer patients, although given the heterogeneity of cancers, whether a "one score fits all" is uncertain.

心房颤动和缺血性中风在癌症:最新的科学证据,目前的管理和未来的方向。
心房颤动是最常见的心律失常,是缺血性中风的主要危险因素。心房颤动和缺血性脑卒中是癌症患者的主要心血管并发症,与一般人群相比,其负担更高,预后更差。卒中和出血的临床风险分层评分,通常在一般人群中分别用于估计血栓栓塞和出血风险,但在癌症患者中得到的验证较少,癌症患者历来被排除在临床试验之外。如何基于现有的工具对癌症患者进行有效的风险分层,以及需要针对每个患者提供量身定制的方法的癌症特异性评分,以便更有效地对该队列患者的缺血性卒中和出血风险进行分层,目前缺乏共识意见。癌症介导的生理变化和抗肿瘤治疗的不良反应被认为是心房颤动和缺血性中风风险增加的病因。风险分层评分,如CHA2DS2-VASc和HAS-BLED,通常用于一般人群,在癌症患者中较少得到验证。尽管考虑到癌症的异质性,“一个评分适合所有”还不确定,但有必要建立癌症特异性评分,以便更有效地对癌症患者的缺血性中风和出血风险进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信