A Descriptive Statistical Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Symptom Pair Prevalence.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Timofey L Galankin, Jina Swartz, Hans J Moebius, Anton Y Bespalov
{"title":"A Descriptive Statistical Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Symptom Pair Prevalence.","authors":"Timofey L Galankin, Jina Swartz, Hans J Moebius, Anton Y Bespalov","doi":"10.1177/08919887251341574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are very common and associated with high levels of distress, both in dementia patients and their caregivers. Especially at more advanced dementia disease stages, NPS rarely occur in isolation and the presence of two or more NPS may affect disease severity as well as the response to therapy. There is limited quantitative information on prevalence of specific symptom combinations in the general population, as well as in the populations recruited for symptom-specific investigations. We performed cross-sectional analyses of data from two longitudinal studies (Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS) and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data (NACC)). In both studies and all Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) strata, we observed every possible pair combination, from commonly recognized and discussed associations (e.g., hallucinations and delusions) to what might be seen as rather counter-intuitive patterns (e.g., apathy and agitation). In conclusion, prevalence of symptom pairs cannot be readily predicted based on prevalence of individual symptoms. Further, the presence of cognitive deficit and degree of cognitive impairment is associated with increased prevalence of all symptoms and symptom pairs, albeit to different degrees. The present study illustrates that, while there is the possibility of any combination of neuropsychiatric symptoms presenting during the course of dementia, their co-occurrence cannot be readily predicted based on the prevalence of individual symptoms. Thus, our study results serve as a source of reference information to inform the design and recruitment strategies for future clinical studies and epidemiological research on neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251341574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251341574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are very common and associated with high levels of distress, both in dementia patients and their caregivers. Especially at more advanced dementia disease stages, NPS rarely occur in isolation and the presence of two or more NPS may affect disease severity as well as the response to therapy. There is limited quantitative information on prevalence of specific symptom combinations in the general population, as well as in the populations recruited for symptom-specific investigations. We performed cross-sectional analyses of data from two longitudinal studies (Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS) and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data (NACC)). In both studies and all Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) strata, we observed every possible pair combination, from commonly recognized and discussed associations (e.g., hallucinations and delusions) to what might be seen as rather counter-intuitive patterns (e.g., apathy and agitation). In conclusion, prevalence of symptom pairs cannot be readily predicted based on prevalence of individual symptoms. Further, the presence of cognitive deficit and degree of cognitive impairment is associated with increased prevalence of all symptoms and symptom pairs, albeit to different degrees. The present study illustrates that, while there is the possibility of any combination of neuropsychiatric symptoms presenting during the course of dementia, their co-occurrence cannot be readily predicted based on the prevalence of individual symptoms. Thus, our study results serve as a source of reference information to inform the design and recruitment strategies for future clinical studies and epidemiological research on neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia.

神经精神症状对患病率的描述性统计分析。
神经精神症状(NPS)非常常见,并且与痴呆症患者及其护理人员的高度痛苦有关。特别是在老年痴呆症晚期,NPS很少单独发生,两种或两种以上NPS的存在可能影响疾病的严重程度以及对治疗的反应。关于一般人群中特定症状组合的患病率的定量信息有限,以及在招募进行症状特异性调查的人群中。我们对两项纵向研究(老龄化、人口统计学和记忆研究(ADAMS)和国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心数据(NACC))的数据进行了横断面分析。在这两项研究和所有迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)的层次中,我们观察了每一种可能的配对组合,从通常公认和讨论的关联(例如,幻觉和妄想)到可能被视为相当反直觉的模式(例如,冷漠和激动)。总之,症状对的流行率不能根据个体症状的流行率轻易预测。此外,认知缺陷和认知障碍程度的存在与所有症状和症状对的患病率增加相关,尽管程度不同。目前的研究表明,虽然在痴呆过程中出现神经精神症状的任何组合都是可能的,但它们的共同出现并不能根据个体症状的流行程度轻易预测。因此,我们的研究结果可为今后痴呆患者神经精神症状的临床研究和流行病学研究的设计和招募策略提供参考信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信