Kevin D Kohl, Nick Barts, Karen Peralta Martínez, Anna Lackey, Emily Lyons, Matthew J Maier, Maya Maurer, Domenique Tripoli, Tate Yawitz, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota, Bret Pasch, M Denise Dearing, Brian K Trevelline
{"title":"How consistent is 'the dynamic gut'?: Complex physiological responses to dietary fiber and protein across three rodent species.","authors":"Kevin D Kohl, Nick Barts, Karen Peralta Martínez, Anna Lackey, Emily Lyons, Matthew J Maier, Maya Maurer, Domenique Tripoli, Tate Yawitz, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota, Bret Pasch, M Denise Dearing, Brian K Trevelline","doi":"10.1242/jeb.249797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, sizes of digestive organs, or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber, and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy, organ sizes, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses e.g., fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacity for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole animal performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, sizes of digestive organs, or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber, and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy, organ sizes, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses e.g., fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacity for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole animal performance.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.