Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching, Ultrasound Therapy, and Pressure Pain Threshold for Masseter Muscle in TMJ Dysfunction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Srikanth Irusappan, Frankin Shaju M Kurusumuthu, Sajani Ramachandran
{"title":"Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching, Ultrasound Therapy, and Pressure Pain Threshold for Masseter Muscle in TMJ Dysfunction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Srikanth Irusappan, Frankin Shaju M Kurusumuthu, Sajani Ramachandran","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of adding bilateral hamstring muscle stretching to pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy, compared to using pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy alone, on pain reduction and maximum vertical mouth opening (MVMO) in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 56 participants diagnosed with TMD were randomly allocated into 2 groups: The Experimental Group, which received bilateral hamstring stretching, pressure pain threshold application, and ultrasound therapy, and the control group, which received only pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy. The study included participants of both genders, aged between 18 and 35 years, with a previous history of TMD pain lasting no longer than 6 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after 5 treatment sessions per week over 1 week. Pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and MVMO was assessed using a vernier caliper. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed a significant reduction in pain and an increase in MVMO in both groups. In the Experimental Group, the mean pain score on the VAS decreased from 6.8 ± 1.2 to 2.9 ± 1.1, whereas in the control group, it decreased from 6.7 ± 1.3 to 4.1 ± 1.2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, MVMO improved significantly, with an increase from 31.4 ± 2.6 mm to 39.8 ± 2.1 mm in the Experimental Group, compared to an increase from 31.2 ± 2.8 mm to 36.1 ± 2.4 mm in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The between-group comparison showed a significant difference in pain reduction and MVMO improvement in the Experimental Group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hamstring stretching combined with ultrasound therapy and pressure pain threshold application was significantly more effective in reducing TMD-related pain and improving MVMO than pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy alone. These findings indicate that integrating hamstring stretching into TMD treatment protocols could improve rehabilitation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The findings of this study highlight the potential benefits of integrating hamstring stretching into standard physiotherapy interventions for TMD. Given the significant improvements observed in pain reduction and MVMO, clinicians may consider including hamstring flexibility exercises in rehabilitation programs for TMD patients to achieve better functional outcomes. How to cite this article: Irusappan S, Kurusumuthu FSM, Ramachandran S. Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching, Ultrasound Therapy, and Pressure Pain Threshold for Masseter Muscle in TMJ Dysfunction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):34-39.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the impact of adding bilateral hamstring muscle stretching to pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy, compared to using pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy alone, on pain reduction and maximum vertical mouth opening (MVMO) in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Materials and methods: A total of 56 participants diagnosed with TMD were randomly allocated into 2 groups: The Experimental Group, which received bilateral hamstring stretching, pressure pain threshold application, and ultrasound therapy, and the control group, which received only pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy. The study included participants of both genders, aged between 18 and 35 years, with a previous history of TMD pain lasting no longer than 6 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after 5 treatment sessions per week over 1 week. Pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and MVMO was assessed using a vernier caliper. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: The results showed a significant reduction in pain and an increase in MVMO in both groups. In the Experimental Group, the mean pain score on the VAS decreased from 6.8 ± 1.2 to 2.9 ± 1.1, whereas in the control group, it decreased from 6.7 ± 1.3 to 4.1 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001). Similarly, MVMO improved significantly, with an increase from 31.4 ± 2.6 mm to 39.8 ± 2.1 mm in the Experimental Group, compared to an increase from 31.2 ± 2.8 mm to 36.1 ± 2.4 mm in the control group (p < 0.001). The between-group comparison showed a significant difference in pain reduction and MVMO improvement in the Experimental Group compared to the control group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Hamstring stretching combined with ultrasound therapy and pressure pain threshold application was significantly more effective in reducing TMD-related pain and improving MVMO than pressure pain threshold and ultrasound therapy alone. These findings indicate that integrating hamstring stretching into TMD treatment protocols could improve rehabilitation outcomes.

Clinical significance: The findings of this study highlight the potential benefits of integrating hamstring stretching into standard physiotherapy interventions for TMD. Given the significant improvements observed in pain reduction and MVMO, clinicians may consider including hamstring flexibility exercises in rehabilitation programs for TMD patients to achieve better functional outcomes. How to cite this article: Irusappan S, Kurusumuthu FSM, Ramachandran S. Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching, Ultrasound Therapy, and Pressure Pain Threshold for Masseter Muscle in TMJ Dysfunction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):34-39.

腿筋拉伸、超声治疗和压痛阈对颞下颌关节功能障碍患者咬肌的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估在压力痛阈和超声治疗下增加双侧腘绳肌拉伸,与单独使用压力痛阈和超声治疗相比,对颞下颌疾病(TMD)患者疼痛减轻和最大垂直开口(MVMO)的影响。材料与方法:将56例确诊为TMD的患者随机分为两组:实验组接受双侧腘绳肌拉伸、压痛阈应用及超声治疗;对照组只接受压痛阈及超声治疗。该研究包括男女参与者,年龄在18至35岁之间,既往TMD疼痛持续时间不超过6个月。在基线和一周内每周5次治疗后进行评估。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛水平,使用游标卡尺评估MVMO。记录数据并进行统计分析。结果:两组患者疼痛明显减轻,MVMO明显增加。试验组疼痛评分由6.8±1.2降至2.9±1.1,对照组由6.7±1.3降至4.1±1.2 (p < 0.001)。同样,MVMO明显改善,实验组从31.4±2.6 mm增加到39.8±2.1 mm,对照组从31.2±2.8 mm增加到36.1±2.4 mm (p < 0.001)。组间比较显示,实验组在疼痛减轻和MVMO改善方面与对照组有显著差异(p < 0.001)。结论:腘绳肌拉伸联合超声治疗和压痛阈应用在减轻tmd相关疼痛和改善MVMO方面明显优于单纯压痛阈和超声治疗。这些发现表明,将腿筋拉伸纳入TMD治疗方案可以改善康复效果。临床意义:本研究结果强调了将腘绳肌拉伸纳入TMD标准物理治疗干预措施的潜在益处。鉴于在减轻疼痛和MVMO方面观察到的显著改善,临床医生可能会考虑在TMD患者的康复计划中包括腘绳肌柔韧性练习,以获得更好的功能结果。Irusappan S, Kurusumuthu FSM, Ramachandran S.腿筋拉伸、超声治疗和压痛阈对颞下颌关节功能障碍患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。现代医疗实践[J]; 2015;26(1):34-39。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信