Predicting Transvaginal Surgical Mesh Exposure Outcomes Using an Integrated Dataset of Blood Cytokine Levels and Medical Record Data: Machine Learning Approach.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mihyun Lim Waugh, Tyler Mills, Nicholas Boltin, Lauren Wolf, Patti Parker, Ronnie Horner, Thomas L Wheeler Ii, Richard L Goodwin, Melissa A Moss
{"title":"Predicting Transvaginal Surgical Mesh Exposure Outcomes Using an Integrated Dataset of Blood Cytokine Levels and Medical Record Data: Machine Learning Approach.","authors":"Mihyun Lim Waugh, Tyler Mills, Nicholas Boltin, Lauren Wolf, Patti Parker, Ronnie Horner, Thomas L Wheeler Ii, Richard L Goodwin, Melissa A Moss","doi":"10.2196/59631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transvaginal insertion of polypropylene mesh was extensively used in surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) due to its cost-efficiency and durability. However, studies have reported a high rate of complications, including mesh exposure through the vaginal wall. Developing predictive models via supervised machine learning holds promise in identifying risk factors associated with such complications, thereby facilitating better informed surgical decisions. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of anticipating medical outcomes by employing supervised machine learning approaches that integrate patient health care data with laboratory findings. However, such an approach has not been adopted within the realm of POP mesh surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the efficacy of supervised machine learning to predict mesh exposure following transvaginal POP surgery using 3 different datasets: (1) patient medical record data, (2) biomaterial-induced blood cytokine levels, and (3) the integration of both.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples and medical record data were collected from 20 female patients who had prior surgical intervention for POP using transvaginal polypropylene mesh. Of these subjects, 10 had experienced mesh exposure through the vaginal wall following surgery, and 10 had not. Standardized medical record data, including vital signs, previous diagnoses, and social history, were acquired from patient records. In addition, cytokine levels in patient blood samples incubated with sterile polypropylene mesh were measured via multiplex assay. Datasets were created with patient medical record data alone, blood cytokine levels alone, and the integration of both data. The data were split into 70% and 30% for training and testing sets, respectively, for machine learning models that predicted the presence or absence of postsurgical mesh exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon training the models with patient medical record data, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and a history of alcohol usage emerged as the most significant factors for predicting mesh exposure. Conversely, when the models were trained solely on blood cytokine levels, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-12 p40 stood out as the most influential cytokines in predicting mesh exposure. Using the combined dataset, new factors emerged as the primary predictors of mesh exposure: IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, and the presence of hemorrhoids. Remarkably, models trained on the integrated dataset demonstrated superior predictive capabilities with a prediction accuracy as high as 94%, surpassing the predictive performance of individual datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supervised machine learning models demonstrated improved prediction accuracy when trained using a composite dataset that combined patient medical record data and biomaterial-induced blood cytokine levels, surpassing the performance of models trained with either dataset in isolation. This result underscores the advantage of integrating health care data with blood biomarkers, presenting a promising avenue for predicting surgical outcomes in not only POP mesh procedures but also other surgeries involving biomaterials. Such an approach has the potential to enhance informed decision-making for both patients and surgeons, ultimately elevating the standard of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e59631"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transvaginal insertion of polypropylene mesh was extensively used in surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) due to its cost-efficiency and durability. However, studies have reported a high rate of complications, including mesh exposure through the vaginal wall. Developing predictive models via supervised machine learning holds promise in identifying risk factors associated with such complications, thereby facilitating better informed surgical decisions. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of anticipating medical outcomes by employing supervised machine learning approaches that integrate patient health care data with laboratory findings. However, such an approach has not been adopted within the realm of POP mesh surgery.

Objective: We examined the efficacy of supervised machine learning to predict mesh exposure following transvaginal POP surgery using 3 different datasets: (1) patient medical record data, (2) biomaterial-induced blood cytokine levels, and (3) the integration of both.

Methods: Blood samples and medical record data were collected from 20 female patients who had prior surgical intervention for POP using transvaginal polypropylene mesh. Of these subjects, 10 had experienced mesh exposure through the vaginal wall following surgery, and 10 had not. Standardized medical record data, including vital signs, previous diagnoses, and social history, were acquired from patient records. In addition, cytokine levels in patient blood samples incubated with sterile polypropylene mesh were measured via multiplex assay. Datasets were created with patient medical record data alone, blood cytokine levels alone, and the integration of both data. The data were split into 70% and 30% for training and testing sets, respectively, for machine learning models that predicted the presence or absence of postsurgical mesh exposure.

Results: Upon training the models with patient medical record data, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and a history of alcohol usage emerged as the most significant factors for predicting mesh exposure. Conversely, when the models were trained solely on blood cytokine levels, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-12 p40 stood out as the most influential cytokines in predicting mesh exposure. Using the combined dataset, new factors emerged as the primary predictors of mesh exposure: IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, and the presence of hemorrhoids. Remarkably, models trained on the integrated dataset demonstrated superior predictive capabilities with a prediction accuracy as high as 94%, surpassing the predictive performance of individual datasets.

Conclusions: Supervised machine learning models demonstrated improved prediction accuracy when trained using a composite dataset that combined patient medical record data and biomaterial-induced blood cytokine levels, surpassing the performance of models trained with either dataset in isolation. This result underscores the advantage of integrating health care data with blood biomarkers, presenting a promising avenue for predicting surgical outcomes in not only POP mesh procedures but also other surgeries involving biomaterials. Such an approach has the potential to enhance informed decision-making for both patients and surgeons, ultimately elevating the standard of patient care.

使用血液细胞因子水平和医疗记录数据的集成数据集预测经阴道手术网片暴露结果:机器学习方法。
背景:经阴道插入聚丙烯网因其成本效益和耐用性被广泛应用于外科手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)。然而,研究报告了并发症的高发生率,包括通过阴道壁暴露网片。通过监督机器学习开发预测模型有望识别与此类并发症相关的风险因素,从而促进更好的手术决策。先前的研究已经证明,通过采用将患者医疗保健数据与实验室结果相结合的监督机器学习方法来预测医疗结果的有效性。然而,这种方法在POP补片手术领域尚未被采用。目的:我们使用3个不同的数据集来检验监督机器学习预测经阴道POP手术后网状物暴露的效果:(1)患者病历数据,(2)生物材料诱导的血液细胞因子水平,以及(3)两者的整合。方法:收集20例经阴道聚丙烯网片手术治疗POP的女性患者的血样和病历资料。在这些受试者中,10人在手术后经历了通过阴道壁的补片暴露,10人没有。从患者病历中获取标准化病历数据,包括生命体征、既往诊断和社会病史。此外,用无菌聚丙烯网孵育的患者血液样本中的细胞因子水平通过多重测定。数据集仅使用患者病历数据、血液细胞因子水平数据创建,并整合这两种数据。这些数据被分为70%和30%,分别用于训练集和测试集,用于预测术后网片暴露是否存在的机器学习模型。结果:在用患者病历数据训练模型后,收缩压、脉压和酒精使用史成为预测网状物暴露的最重要因素。相反,当模型只接受血液细胞因子水平的训练时,白细胞介素(IL)-1β和IL-12 p40成为预测网格暴露最具影响力的细胞因子。使用合并的数据集,出现了新的因素作为网状暴露的主要预测因素:IL-8、肿瘤坏死因子-α和痔疮的存在。值得注意的是,在集成数据集上训练的模型显示出卓越的预测能力,预测精度高达94%,超过了单个数据集的预测性能。结论:有监督的机器学习模型在使用结合患者病历数据和生物材料诱导的血液细胞因子水平的复合数据集训练时显示出更高的预测准确性,超过了单独使用任何数据集训练的模型的性能。该结果强调了将医疗保健数据与血液生物标志物相结合的优势,为预测手术结果提供了一条有前途的途径,不仅适用于POP网状手术,也适用于其他涉及生物材料的手术。这种方法有可能提高患者和外科医生的知情决策,最终提高患者护理的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信