Risk analysis of cardiovascular mortality after gastric cancer diagnosis: a large population-based study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1459151
Qiang Zhao, Qiaohong Zhou, Jiayue Dong, Qiang Tong
{"title":"Risk analysis of cardiovascular mortality after gastric cancer diagnosis: a large population-based study.","authors":"Qiang Zhao, Qiaohong Zhou, Jiayue Dong, Qiang Tong","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1459151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of cardiovascular mortality is becoming a significant worry for individuals who have survived cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the dynamic trend of cardiovascular death in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and identify the risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific mortality in non-metastatic GC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, 29,324 eligible patients diagnosed with primary GC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) adjusted by age, gender, calendar year, and race were calculated. Fine-Gray's competing risk models were taken to identify the prognostic factors of cardiovascular death in GC patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1083 (5.2%) cardiovascular deaths among 20,857 patients with local/regional GC, and 76 (0.9%) cardiovascular deaths among 8,467 patients with metastatic GC. The SMRs of CVD-specific mortality continuously increased since the 1975s throughout the 2015s. The competing risk models showed that age (>75 years vs. 0-50 years, HR: 6.602, 95% CI: 4.356-10.006), T stage (T4 vs. T1, HR:0.524, 95% CI: 0.370-0.741), N stage (N3 vs. N0, HR: 0.557, 95% CI: 0.343-0.903), surgery (Yes vs. No, HR: 0.551, 95% CI: 0.461-0.659), and radiotherapy (Yes vs. No, HR: 1.011, 95% CI: 1.011-1.437) were predictive of CVD-specific mortality. Furthermore, based on the results of the competing risk analyses, a nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of CVD-specific mortality for local/regional GC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated the dynamic trend of cardiovascular death in GC patients, and identified prognostic risk predictors, highlighting the importance cardio-oncology teams in offering comprehensive care and long-term follow-up for GC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1459151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1459151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of cardiovascular mortality is becoming a significant worry for individuals who have survived cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the dynamic trend of cardiovascular death in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and identify the risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific mortality in non-metastatic GC patients.

Methods: In the present study, 29,324 eligible patients diagnosed with primary GC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) adjusted by age, gender, calendar year, and race were calculated. Fine-Gray's competing risk models were taken to identify the prognostic factors of cardiovascular death in GC patients.

Results: There were 1083 (5.2%) cardiovascular deaths among 20,857 patients with local/regional GC, and 76 (0.9%) cardiovascular deaths among 8,467 patients with metastatic GC. The SMRs of CVD-specific mortality continuously increased since the 1975s throughout the 2015s. The competing risk models showed that age (>75 years vs. 0-50 years, HR: 6.602, 95% CI: 4.356-10.006), T stage (T4 vs. T1, HR:0.524, 95% CI: 0.370-0.741), N stage (N3 vs. N0, HR: 0.557, 95% CI: 0.343-0.903), surgery (Yes vs. No, HR: 0.551, 95% CI: 0.461-0.659), and radiotherapy (Yes vs. No, HR: 1.011, 95% CI: 1.011-1.437) were predictive of CVD-specific mortality. Furthermore, based on the results of the competing risk analyses, a nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of CVD-specific mortality for local/regional GC patients.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the dynamic trend of cardiovascular death in GC patients, and identified prognostic risk predictors, highlighting the importance cardio-oncology teams in offering comprehensive care and long-term follow-up for GC patients.

胃癌诊断后心血管疾病死亡率的风险分析:一项基于人群的大型研究
背景:心血管疾病死亡率的上升正成为癌症幸存者的一大担忧。本研究的目的是探讨胃癌(GC)患者心血管死亡的动态趋势,并确定与非转移性胃癌患者心血管疾病(CVD)特异性死亡率相关的危险因素。方法:在本研究中,从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中收集了29,324例诊断为原发性GC的合格患者。计算按年龄、性别、日历年和种族调整的标准化死亡率(SMRs)。采用Fine-Gray的竞争风险模型来确定GC患者心血管死亡的预后因素。结果:20,857例局部/区域性胃癌患者中有1083例(5.2%)心血管死亡,8,467例转移性胃癌患者中有76例(0.9%)心血管死亡。从20世纪75年代到2015年,心血管疾病特异性死亡率的最低死亡率持续上升。相互竞争的风险模型显示,年龄(0 ~ 75岁vs 0 ~ 50岁,HR: 6.602, 95% CI: 4.356 ~ 10.006)、T分期(T4 vs T1, HR:0.524, 95% CI: 0.360 ~ 0.741)、N分期(N3 vs N0, HR: 0.557, 95% CI: 0.343 ~ 0.903)、手术(是vs否,HR: 0.551, 95% CI: 0.461 ~ 0.659)和放疗(是vs否,HR: 1.011, 95% CI: 1.011 ~ 1.437)是cvd特异性死亡率的预测因素。此外,基于竞争风险分析的结果,构建了一个nomogram来预测本地/区域GC患者cvd特异性死亡率的概率。结论:我们的研究显示了GC患者心血管死亡的动态趋势,并确定了预后风险预测因素,强调了心血管肿瘤学团队在为GC患者提供全面护理和长期随访方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信