Air pollution and preterm birth: comparing trimester average and repeated threshold exposure metrics in a North Carolina birth cohort, 2003-2015.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sanjida J Mowla, Alison K Krajewski, Adrien A Wilkie, Kristen M Rappazzo, Thomas J Luben
{"title":"Air pollution and preterm birth: comparing trimester average and repeated threshold exposure metrics in a North Carolina birth cohort, 2003-2015.","authors":"Sanjida J Mowla, Alison K Krajewski, Adrien A Wilkie, Kristen M Rappazzo, Thomas J Luben","doi":"10.1038/s41370-025-00774-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposures to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy are associated with preterm birth (PTB) in studies that evaluate average pollutant concentrations during potential \"windows of susceptibility,\" referred to as critical windows.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated associations between ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) or particulate matter <2.5 micrometers (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) during pregnancy and PTB, using continuous and categorical metrics of average exposure and repeated exceedances of threshold concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from North Carolina (NC) birth certificates from the NC Birth Defects Monitoring Program, limited to live, singleton births without birth defects and delivered from 2003-2015. The EPA's Fused Air Quality Surface Using Downscaling (fCMAQ) model was used to assign exposures for trimester-average and daily threshold exceedances for O<sub>3</sub> (daily 8-h maximum) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (24-h average) at different daily threshold concentrations (O<sub>3</sub>: 55-70 ppb; PM<sub>2.5</sub>: 20-35 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) during trimesters 1 and 2 of pregnancy. Descriptive statistics, including weighted kappa statistics, were evaluated. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk differences (RDs) per 10,000 births.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the cohort of 1,368,370 births, 8.4% were PTBs. The number of daily exposure exceedances ranged from 0 to 81 days over different threshold concentrations during trimester 1 or 2. There was slight to moderate agreement in risk associated with trimester average and daily threshold exposures exceedances, with decreased agreement among higher threshold concentrations. RDs ranged from -31 to 29 for average O<sub>3</sub> exposure and from -2 to 89 for repeated O<sub>3</sub> threshold exceedances. RDs ranged from 23 to 120 for average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and from -227 to 118 for repeated PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study provides insights into the heterogeneity in risk of PTB when assessing different air pollution exposure metrics.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study investigates the impact of O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures during pregnancy on the risk of PTB, using measures based on both average concentrations and repeated exceedances of threshold levels. The findings address uncertainties identified in recent NAAQS reviews and suggests that repeated exposure metrics may capture differences in exposure that are not apparent when evaluating average exposure metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00774-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exposures to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy are associated with preterm birth (PTB) in studies that evaluate average pollutant concentrations during potential "windows of susceptibility," referred to as critical windows.

Objective: We evaluated associations between ozone (O3) or particulate matter <2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) during pregnancy and PTB, using continuous and categorical metrics of average exposure and repeated exceedances of threshold concentrations.

Methods: We analyzed data from North Carolina (NC) birth certificates from the NC Birth Defects Monitoring Program, limited to live, singleton births without birth defects and delivered from 2003-2015. The EPA's Fused Air Quality Surface Using Downscaling (fCMAQ) model was used to assign exposures for trimester-average and daily threshold exceedances for O3 (daily 8-h maximum) and PM2.5 (24-h average) at different daily threshold concentrations (O3: 55-70 ppb; PM2.5: 20-35 µg/m3) during trimesters 1 and 2 of pregnancy. Descriptive statistics, including weighted kappa statistics, were evaluated. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk differences (RDs) per 10,000 births.

Results: Among the cohort of 1,368,370 births, 8.4% were PTBs. The number of daily exposure exceedances ranged from 0 to 81 days over different threshold concentrations during trimester 1 or 2. There was slight to moderate agreement in risk associated with trimester average and daily threshold exposures exceedances, with decreased agreement among higher threshold concentrations. RDs ranged from -31 to 29 for average O3 exposure and from -2 to 89 for repeated O3 threshold exceedances. RDs ranged from 23 to 120 for average PM2.5 exposure and from -227 to 118 for repeated PM2.5 exposure.

Significance: This study provides insights into the heterogeneity in risk of PTB when assessing different air pollution exposure metrics.

Impact: This study investigates the impact of O3 and PM2.5 exposures during pregnancy on the risk of PTB, using measures based on both average concentrations and repeated exceedances of threshold levels. The findings address uncertainties identified in recent NAAQS reviews and suggests that repeated exposure metrics may capture differences in exposure that are not apparent when evaluating average exposure metrics.

空气污染和早产:比较2003-2015年北卡罗来纳州出生队列的三个月平均和重复阈值暴露指标。
背景:在评估潜在“易感窗口”(即关键窗口)期间平均污染物浓度的研究中,怀孕期间暴露于环境空气污染物与早产(PTB)有关。目的:我们利用平均暴露和反复超过阈值浓度的连续和分类指标,评估怀孕期间臭氧(O3)或颗粒物2.5与PTB之间的关系。方法:我们分析了来自北卡罗来纳州出生缺陷监测计划的出生证明数据,这些数据仅限于2003-2015年出生的无出生缺陷的活产单胎婴儿。EPA的融合空气质量表面使用降尺度(fCMAQ)模型用于分配不同日阈值浓度(O3: 55-70 ppb;PM2.5: 20 ~ 35µg/m3)。描述性统计,包括加权kappa统计进行评估。修正泊松回归模型用于估计每10,000个新生儿的调整风险差异(RDs)。结果:1,368,370名新生儿中,8.4%为pbs。在妊娠1或妊娠2个月期间,超过不同阈值浓度的日暴露超标天数从0天到81天不等。在妊娠期平均和每日阈值暴露超标的风险方面有轻微到中度的一致性,在阈值浓度较高的情况下一致性降低。臭氧平均暴露的RDs范围为-31至29,臭氧重复阈值超标的RDs范围为-2至89。平均暴露于PM2.5的RDs范围为23至120,重复暴露于PM2.5的RDs范围为-227至118。意义:本研究在评估不同空气污染暴露指标时,提供了PTB风险异质性的见解。影响:本研究调查了怀孕期间臭氧和PM2.5暴露对肺结核风险的影响,采用了基于平均浓度和反复超过阈值水平的测量方法。研究结果解决了最近NAAQS评审中发现的不确定性,并表明重复暴露度量可能捕捉到在评估平均暴露度量时不明显的暴露差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信