Prognostic factors of intracorneal rings segment to a successful treatment and probability of success calculation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Loïc Dambricourt, Gaëlle Ho Wang Yin, Natanaël Levy, Danièle Denis, Thierry David
{"title":"Prognostic factors of intracorneal rings segment to a successful treatment and probability of success calculation.","authors":"Loïc Dambricourt, Gaëlle Ho Wang Yin, Natanaël Levy, Danièle Denis, Thierry David","doi":"10.1177/11206721251331662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo identify prognostic factors for the success of intracorneal rings segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus, define a \"good responder\" patient, and estimate the probability of success of the intervention.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 130 eyes underwent ICRS implantation with Keraring and Intacs SK. Refractive, topographic, and aberrometric variables were measured before and after intervention, then patients were classified into \"success\" and \"failure\" groups based on postoperative refractive and aberrometric data. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify prognostic factors and develop a calculation formula for probability of success.ResultsSuccess was observed in 64.6% of patients while 35.4% experienced failure. In the success group, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in logMAR was higher (0.38 ± 0.23 vs 0.28 ± 0.21, p = 0.03), corneal asphericity (Q-value) was less prolate (-0.92 ± 0.43 vs -1.10 ± 0.40; p = 0.009), and distance between Kmax and center of pupil (DKmax) was higher (1.65 ± 0.83 vs 1.35 ± 0.70; p = 0.045). Maximal keratometry (Kmax) was lower (58.38 ± 4.83 vs 59.86 ± 4.42; p = 0.068) and spherical equivalent (SE) was more negative (-3.77 ± 3.20 vs -3.05 ± 3.65; p = 0.09) but not statistically significant. With a logistic regression model, we created a calculation formula of the probability of success including keratoconus stage, CDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), SE, Kmax, Q-Value and DKmax.ConclusionsICRS implantation has a higher chance of success in stage III keratoconus, eccentric, with myopic astigmatism, visual loss, Q-Value close to zero and low Kmax. The calculation of the probability of success helps to select patients for surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251331662"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251331662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo identify prognostic factors for the success of intracorneal rings segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus, define a "good responder" patient, and estimate the probability of success of the intervention.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 130 eyes underwent ICRS implantation with Keraring and Intacs SK. Refractive, topographic, and aberrometric variables were measured before and after intervention, then patients were classified into "success" and "failure" groups based on postoperative refractive and aberrometric data. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify prognostic factors and develop a calculation formula for probability of success.ResultsSuccess was observed in 64.6% of patients while 35.4% experienced failure. In the success group, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in logMAR was higher (0.38 ± 0.23 vs 0.28 ± 0.21, p = 0.03), corneal asphericity (Q-value) was less prolate (-0.92 ± 0.43 vs -1.10 ± 0.40; p = 0.009), and distance between Kmax and center of pupil (DKmax) was higher (1.65 ± 0.83 vs 1.35 ± 0.70; p = 0.045). Maximal keratometry (Kmax) was lower (58.38 ± 4.83 vs 59.86 ± 4.42; p = 0.068) and spherical equivalent (SE) was more negative (-3.77 ± 3.20 vs -3.05 ± 3.65; p = 0.09) but not statistically significant. With a logistic regression model, we created a calculation formula of the probability of success including keratoconus stage, CDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), SE, Kmax, Q-Value and DKmax.ConclusionsICRS implantation has a higher chance of success in stage III keratoconus, eccentric, with myopic astigmatism, visual loss, Q-Value close to zero and low Kmax. The calculation of the probability of success helps to select patients for surgery.

角膜内环段治疗成功的预后因素及成功概率的计算。
目的探讨影响圆锥角膜内环段植入术成功的预后因素,确定“反应良好”的患者,并估计干预成功的可能性。方法回顾性研究130只眼采用Keraring和Intacs SK进行ICRS植入术,测量干预前后的屈光、地形学和像差指标,并根据术后屈光和像差数据将患者分为成功组和失败组。进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定预后因素,并制定成功概率的计算公式。结果64.6%的患者成功,35.4%的患者失败。成功组logMAR矫正距离视力(CDVA)较高(0.38±0.23 vs 0.28±0.21,p = 0.03),角膜非球度(q值)较短(-0.92±0.43 vs -1.10±0.40;p = 0.009), Kmax与瞳孔中心的距离(DKmax)更高(1.65±0.83 vs 1.35±0.70;p = 0.045)。最大角膜测量值(Kmax)较低(58.38±4.83 vs 59.86±4.42);p = 0.068),球形当量(SE)更负(-3.77±3.20 vs -3.05±3.65;P = 0.09),但无统计学意义。通过logistic回归模型,建立了包括圆锥角膜分期、CDVA、未矫正距离视力(UDVA)、SE、Kmax、Q-Value和DKmax在内的成功概率计算公式。结论sicrs植入术对III期圆锥角膜偏心、近视散光、视力下降、q值接近于零、Kmax较低的患者成功率较高。成功概率的计算有助于选择手术患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信