The estimation of biological sex through the radius and ulna in Portuguese reference skeletal samples.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Catarina Pinto, Sandra Marques, Maria Teresa Ferreira, Susana Garcia, Francisco Curate
{"title":"The estimation of biological sex through the radius and ulna in Portuguese reference skeletal samples.","authors":"Catarina Pinto, Sandra Marques, Maria Teresa Ferreira, Susana Garcia, Francisco Curate","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03507-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex estimation is a critical step in the identification process of human skeletal remains, alongside age, stature and population affinities. The pelvis is the most dimorphic skeletal region but the long bones also provide good estimates of sex. This study aims to develop models for sex estimation using the ulna and radius in a pooled sample of 181 individuals (107 females, 74 males) from the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection and the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection. A metric approach was implemented for sex estimation based on these measurements, resulting in fifteen models generated through logistic regression that were subsequently tested in the Lisbon Identified Skeletal Collection (N = 107; 61 females, 55 males). The resulting models were contrived in an online responsive application ( https://vertigemdasespecies.shinyapps.io/RADIULNA/ ) designed to facilitate sex predictions. In general, the models present high accuracy and low sex-bias. Overall accuracies vary between 84.0% and 95.8% under cross-validation, and between 81.9% and 90.6% in the testing sample. Among the radius-only models, the 3R model (variables sagittal diameter of the head, head-tuberosity radial length and distal epiphysis width) presents the higher accuracy under cross-validation (94.7%), while the 4R model (same variables as 3R plus the circumference of the radial tuberosity) shows the best performance in the testing sample (90.6%). In the ulna, the model with higher cross-validated accuracy is the 4U model (variables maximum length, ulnar coronoid height and circumference at the midshaft), while the 2U model (variables maximum length and ulnar notch length) performs better in the testing set (89.8%).</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03507-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sex estimation is a critical step in the identification process of human skeletal remains, alongside age, stature and population affinities. The pelvis is the most dimorphic skeletal region but the long bones also provide good estimates of sex. This study aims to develop models for sex estimation using the ulna and radius in a pooled sample of 181 individuals (107 females, 74 males) from the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection and the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection. A metric approach was implemented for sex estimation based on these measurements, resulting in fifteen models generated through logistic regression that were subsequently tested in the Lisbon Identified Skeletal Collection (N = 107; 61 females, 55 males). The resulting models were contrived in an online responsive application ( https://vertigemdasespecies.shinyapps.io/RADIULNA/ ) designed to facilitate sex predictions. In general, the models present high accuracy and low sex-bias. Overall accuracies vary between 84.0% and 95.8% under cross-validation, and between 81.9% and 90.6% in the testing sample. Among the radius-only models, the 3R model (variables sagittal diameter of the head, head-tuberosity radial length and distal epiphysis width) presents the higher accuracy under cross-validation (94.7%), while the 4R model (same variables as 3R plus the circumference of the radial tuberosity) shows the best performance in the testing sample (90.6%). In the ulna, the model with higher cross-validated accuracy is the 4U model (variables maximum length, ulnar coronoid height and circumference at the midshaft), while the 2U model (variables maximum length and ulnar notch length) performs better in the testing set (89.8%).

通过葡萄牙参考骨骼样本的桡骨和尺骨来估计生物性别。
性别估计是鉴定人类骨骼遗骸过程中的一个关键步骤,与年龄、身材和种群亲和力一样。骨盆是最具二态性的骨骼区域,但长骨也提供了很好的性别估计。本研究的目的是建立基于尺骨和桡骨的性别估计模型,该模型来自科英布拉鉴定骨骼收集和21世纪鉴定骨骼收集的181个个体(107个女性,74个男性)的汇总样本。在这些测量的基础上实施了一种度量方法来进行性别估计,通过逻辑回归产生了15个模型,随后在里斯本鉴定骨骼收藏中进行了测试(N = 107;女性61人,男性55人)。结果模型是在一个在线响应应用程序(https://vertigemdasespecies.shinyapps.io/RADIULNA/)中设计出来的,旨在促进性别预测。总体而言,模型具有较高的准确性和较低的性别偏差。交叉验证的总体准确度在84.0%到95.8%之间,在测试样本中在81.9%到90.6%之间。在只考虑半径的模型中,3R模型(变量为头矢状直径、头结节桡骨长度和远端骨骺宽度)在交叉验证中准确率较高(94.7%),而4R模型(变量为3R +桡骨结节周长)在测试样本中表现最佳(90.6%)。在尺骨中,交叉验证准确率较高的模型是4U模型(变量为最大长度、尺骨冠高度和中轴周长),而2U模型(变量为最大长度和尺骨切迹长度)在测试集中表现较好(89.8%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信