Assessment of the scalpel blade as an objective tool for measuring dermatome cut thickness.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Dallan P Dargan, Lawrence J Gottlieb, Sebastian Q Vrouwe
{"title":"Assessment of the scalpel blade as an objective tool for measuring dermatome cut thickness.","authors":"Dallan P Dargan, Lawrence J Gottlieb, Sebastian Q Vrouwe","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dermatomes are widely used for split thickness skin graft harvest. The graft thickness depends in part on the cut thickness setting, adjusted by the surgeon using a lever on the dermatome. This study aimed to assess whether a #15 scalpel blade placed in the dermatome blade aperture may reliably confirm the cut thickness setting (the scalpel dermatome test). Discrepancies between the blade-measured aperture and the cut thickness setting and the intra- and interobserver reliability of the technique were evaluated. The thickness of ten #15 blades (n=10) was measured using a micrometer. Six dermatomes were each assessed by two surgeons in triplicate each for the narrowest cut thickness setting that would permit passage of an entire surgical blade through the dermatome blade aperture, starting at zero and increasing cut thickness intervals of 1/1000 in. The mean scalpel blade thickness was 0.391 mm (~15/1000 in). The mean cut thickness setting which would permit the blade was 6/1000 in (range 2-9), p<0.001. Intra-observer reliability was good (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.89). Inter-observer reliability was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.52) and a mean difference of 1.5/1000 in was observed (6.8 versus 5.2, t-test p<0.018). Individual dermatome apertures differed, with the mean of three measurements for each ranging from 5.0 to 7.8/1000 in, p<0.001. Differences exist between scalpel blades, dermatomes and surgeons, however intra-observer reliability is good. The test is a simple maneuver, which can objectively validate the dermatome blade aperture, thereby preventing harm and optimising graft thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dermatomes are widely used for split thickness skin graft harvest. The graft thickness depends in part on the cut thickness setting, adjusted by the surgeon using a lever on the dermatome. This study aimed to assess whether a #15 scalpel blade placed in the dermatome blade aperture may reliably confirm the cut thickness setting (the scalpel dermatome test). Discrepancies between the blade-measured aperture and the cut thickness setting and the intra- and interobserver reliability of the technique were evaluated. The thickness of ten #15 blades (n=10) was measured using a micrometer. Six dermatomes were each assessed by two surgeons in triplicate each for the narrowest cut thickness setting that would permit passage of an entire surgical blade through the dermatome blade aperture, starting at zero and increasing cut thickness intervals of 1/1000 in. The mean scalpel blade thickness was 0.391 mm (~15/1000 in). The mean cut thickness setting which would permit the blade was 6/1000 in (range 2-9), p<0.001. Intra-observer reliability was good (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.89). Inter-observer reliability was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.52) and a mean difference of 1.5/1000 in was observed (6.8 versus 5.2, t-test p<0.018). Individual dermatome apertures differed, with the mean of three measurements for each ranging from 5.0 to 7.8/1000 in, p<0.001. Differences exist between scalpel blades, dermatomes and surgeons, however intra-observer reliability is good. The test is a simple maneuver, which can objectively validate the dermatome blade aperture, thereby preventing harm and optimising graft thickness.

评估手术刀刀片作为测量皮肤切割厚度的客观工具。
皮体被广泛应用于分厚皮肤移植。移植物的厚度部分取决于切口厚度的设置,由外科医生使用皮节上的杠杆进行调整。本研究旨在评估将15号手术刀刀片置于皮组刀片孔径中是否可以可靠地确认切口厚度设置(手术刀皮组测试)。评估了叶片测量孔径与切割厚度设置之间的差异以及该技术在观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。用千分尺测量10个15号叶片(n=10)的厚度。由两名外科医生评估六个皮节,每一份三份,以最窄的切口厚度设置,允许整个手术刀片通过皮节刀片孔径,从零开始,增加切口厚度间隔1/1000英寸。手术刀刀片平均厚度为0.391 mm (~15/1000 in)。允许刀片的平均切割厚度设置为6/1000英寸(范围2-9),p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信