Effects of sports drinks with different molecular weight carbohydrates on rehydration during endurance exercise: a comparative study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Qiushi Tan, Zhiguang Zhao, Aiqi Yu, Mai Xiang, Qi Han, Jingyi Zhu, Xuemei Sui, Qirong Wang
{"title":"Effects of sports drinks with different molecular weight carbohydrates on rehydration during endurance exercise: a comparative study.","authors":"Qiushi Tan, Zhiguang Zhao, Aiqi Yu, Mai Xiang, Qi Han, Jingyi Zhu, Xuemei Sui, Qirong Wang","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16364-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of low-molecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) carbohydrate (CHO) sports drinks on rehydration during endurance exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten middle- and long-distance running athletes were selected in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. One day before the experiment, a pre-experiment was performed to determine the VO<inf>2peak</inf>. The formal experiment consisted of a two-stage exercise test. In the first test, participants rode an electrically braked cycle ergometer for 1 hour with an intensity of 70%VO<inf>2peak</inf> and were supplemented with three kinds of sports drinks, namely, LMW CHO (oligosaccharides), HMW CHO (Vitargo), and placebo (PLA), at 1.8 mL/kg·bw every 15 minutes. Venous blood, capillary blood, and urine were collected during exercise. The second test was conducted 6 hours after the first test and employed an intensity of 75%VO<inf>2peak</inf> and the same rehydration strategy. The rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded every 15 minutes until exhaustion, and the time to exhaustion (TTE) was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of body weight loss before and after exercise was significantly lower in the LMW group than in the HMW group (P<0.05). The serum or urine Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, and Cl<sup>-</sup> concentrations did not significantly differ among the groups (P>0.05). No significant differences in plasma osmolarity, urine osmolarity, lactic acid, blood pH, or exercise exhaustion time were found among the groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sports drinks containing LMW CHO were better at maintaining hydration than those containing HMW CHO. Sports drinks with different molecular weights of CHO had no significant effect on athletic performance or blood pH.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16364-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of low-molecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) carbohydrate (CHO) sports drinks on rehydration during endurance exercise.

Methods: Ten middle- and long-distance running athletes were selected in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. One day before the experiment, a pre-experiment was performed to determine the VO2peak. The formal experiment consisted of a two-stage exercise test. In the first test, participants rode an electrically braked cycle ergometer for 1 hour with an intensity of 70%VO2peak and were supplemented with three kinds of sports drinks, namely, LMW CHO (oligosaccharides), HMW CHO (Vitargo), and placebo (PLA), at 1.8 mL/kg·bw every 15 minutes. Venous blood, capillary blood, and urine were collected during exercise. The second test was conducted 6 hours after the first test and employed an intensity of 75%VO2peak and the same rehydration strategy. The rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded every 15 minutes until exhaustion, and the time to exhaustion (TTE) was recorded.

Results: The percentage of body weight loss before and after exercise was significantly lower in the LMW group than in the HMW group (P<0.05). The serum or urine Na+, K+, and Cl- concentrations did not significantly differ among the groups (P>0.05). No significant differences in plasma osmolarity, urine osmolarity, lactic acid, blood pH, or exercise exhaustion time were found among the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Sports drinks containing LMW CHO were better at maintaining hydration than those containing HMW CHO. Sports drinks with different molecular weights of CHO had no significant effect on athletic performance or blood pH.

不同分子量碳水化合物运动饮料对耐力运动补液影响的比较研究。
背景:本研究的目的是比较低分子量(LMW)和高分子量(HMW)碳水化合物(CHO)运动饮料对耐力运动中补液的影响。方法:采用随机、双盲、交叉设计,选取10名中长跑运动员。实验前一天进行预实验,测定vo2峰。正式实验包括两个阶段的运动测试。在第一个测试中,参与者以70% vo2峰值的强度骑电制动自行车测力仪1小时,并以每15分钟1.8 mL/kg·bw的速度补充LMW CHO(低聚糖)、HMW CHO(维他果)和安慰剂(PLA) 3种运动饮料。运动时采集静脉血、毛细血管血和尿液。第二次试验在第一次试验后6小时进行,采用75% vo2峰值强度和相同的补液策略。每15分钟记录一次感知用力率(RPE),直至精疲力竭,并记录到精疲力竭时间(TTE)。结果:LMW组运动前后体重减轻百分比明显低于HMW组(P+、K+、Cl-浓度组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间血浆渗透压、尿渗透压、乳酸、血pH、运动衰竭时间差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:低分子量CHO运动饮料的补水效果优于高分子量CHO运动饮料。不同分子量的CHO运动饮料对运动成绩和血液pH值无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信