Outcomes of Robotic MIDCAB With Hybrid PCI for Multivessel Coronary Disease Involving the Left Main: Results of 62 Cases.

IF 1.6 Q2 SURGERY
Noritsugu Naito, Homam Ibrahim, Cezar Staniloae, Louai Razzouk, Michael Dorsey, Eugene Grossi, Didier F Loulmet
{"title":"Outcomes of Robotic MIDCAB With Hybrid PCI for Multivessel Coronary Disease Involving the Left Main: Results of 62 Cases.","authors":"Noritsugu Naito, Homam Ibrahim, Cezar Staniloae, Louai Razzouk, Michael Dorsey, Eugene Grossi, Didier F Loulmet","doi":"10.1177/15569845251324200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hybrid coronary revascularization is a clinical strategy that uses a combination of surgical revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on the hybrid approach for coronary artery disease involving the left main (LM) are scarce. We analyzed our cohort of hybrid coronary revascularizations with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) using robotic left internal mammary artery harvesting and PCI for multivessel disease with and without LM involvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2013 and December 2020, 105 patients consecutively underwent robotic MIDCAB. Of those, 62 patients (59.1%) had multivessel coronary artery disease and underwent revascularization via the hybrid approach using robotic MIDCAB and PCI. Patients were then stratified into 2 groups for comparison: LM disease (<i>n</i> = 22, 35.5%) and non-LM disease (<i>n</i> = 40, 64.5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SYNTAX scores were significantly lower in the non-LM group compared with the LM group (19.06 ± 6.41 vs 24.86 ± 7.04, <i>P</i> = 0.002). There were no other significant differences in demographics between the groups. There were no 30-day mortalities in either group. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 5 years was 72.2% in the non-LM group and 61.0% in the LM group (<i>P</i> = 0.89). There were no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (94.1% vs 83.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.074) or freedom from coronary reintervention (83.4% vs 75.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.699).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid robotic MIDCAB for patients with and without LM disease can be performed with acceptable results in selected patients. However, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions regarding safety and efficacy compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251324200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hybrid coronary revascularization is a clinical strategy that uses a combination of surgical revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on the hybrid approach for coronary artery disease involving the left main (LM) are scarce. We analyzed our cohort of hybrid coronary revascularizations with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) using robotic left internal mammary artery harvesting and PCI for multivessel disease with and without LM involvement.

Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2020, 105 patients consecutively underwent robotic MIDCAB. Of those, 62 patients (59.1%) had multivessel coronary artery disease and underwent revascularization via the hybrid approach using robotic MIDCAB and PCI. Patients were then stratified into 2 groups for comparison: LM disease (n = 22, 35.5%) and non-LM disease (n = 40, 64.5%).

Results: The SYNTAX scores were significantly lower in the non-LM group compared with the LM group (19.06 ± 6.41 vs 24.86 ± 7.04, P = 0.002). There were no other significant differences in demographics between the groups. There were no 30-day mortalities in either group. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 5 years was 72.2% in the non-LM group and 61.0% in the LM group (P = 0.89). There were no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (94.1% vs 83.3%, P = 0.074) or freedom from coronary reintervention (83.4% vs 75.4%, P = 0.699).

Conclusions: Hybrid robotic MIDCAB for patients with and without LM disease can be performed with acceptable results in selected patients. However, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions regarding safety and efficacy compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

机器人MIDCAB联合混合PCI治疗累及左主干的多支冠状动脉疾病62例的结果
目的:混合型冠状动脉血管重建术是一种结合外科血管重建术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的临床策略。关于混合入路治疗累及左主干的冠状动脉疾病的资料很少。我们分析了微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术(MIDCAB)的混合冠状动脉重建术队列,该队列采用机器人左乳内动脉采集和PCI治疗有或无LM累及的多血管疾病。方法:2013年1月至2020年12月,105例患者连续接受机器人MIDCAB。其中,62名患者(59.1%)患有多支冠状动脉疾病,并通过机器人MIDCAB和PCI混合入路进行了血运重建术。然后将患者分为两组进行比较:LM疾病(n = 22, 35.5%)和非LM疾病(n = 40, 64.5%)。结果:非LM组SYNTAX评分明显低于LM组(19.06±6.41 vs 24.86±7.04,P = 0.002)。两组之间在人口统计学上没有其他显著差异。两组均无30天死亡率。5年时,非LM组的主要心脑血管不良事件发生率为72.2%,LM组为61.0% (P = 0.89)。5年总生存率(94.1% vs 83.3%, P = 0.074)和冠状动脉再介入自由度(83.4% vs 75.4%, P = 0.699)无显著差异。结论:混合机器人MIDCAB可用于有或无LM疾病的患者,在选定的患者中可获得可接受的结果。然而,与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,尚不能得出关于安全性和有效性的明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery is the first journal whose main mission is to disseminate information specifically about advances in technology and techniques that lead to less invasive treatment of cardiothoracic and vascular disease. It delivers cutting edge original research, reviews, essays, case reports, and editorials from the pioneers and experts in the field of minimally invasive cardiothoracic and vascular disease, including biomedical engineers. Also included are papers presented at the annual ISMICS meeting. Official Journal of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信