MR imaging and cholangiography show suboptimal performance for diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11606-0
Quentin Buhot, Quentin Bui, Hedi Chekir, Coline Delalandre, Sanaâ El Mouhadi, Quentin Vanderbecq, Mathilde Wagner, Lionel Arrivé
{"title":"MR imaging and cholangiography show suboptimal performance for diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients.","authors":"Quentin Buhot, Quentin Bui, Hedi Chekir, Coline Delalandre, Sanaâ El Mouhadi, Quentin Vanderbecq, Mathilde Wagner, Lionel Arrivé","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11606-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of MR imaging/cholangiography for ductal cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) diagnosis and to search for specific MR features of ductal CCA among primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients from a single center, each with a diagnosis of PSC, and suspicion of ductal CCA. Ductal CCA had been suspected during multidisciplinary team meetings when high-grade biliary stenosis was associated with focal thickening of the biliary wall. Two radiologists blinded to clinical information and imaging history independently reviewed patients' MR examinations using a standardized model created for this study. Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were used to analyze the population's characteristics. Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test were used to compare associations of categorical variables (each standard model's item) with the final diagnosis. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Cohen's κ coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our population had a mean age of 42.7 ± 13.6 years and included 68% males. The final diagnosis was ductal CCA for 14 patients, and inflammatory stenosis for 17 patients. For diagnosing CCA, MR imaging/cholangiography exhibited a sensitivity of 43-50% and specificity of 70-76%, with low positive predictive (58-60%) and negative predictive (62-63%) values. Interobserver agreement ranged from κ = 0.04-0.75. Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between individual MR imaging/cholangiography features and CCA diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MR imaging/cholangiography showed suboptimal performance for ductal CCA diagnosis among PSC patients and we did not find any specific feature to distinguish ductal CCA from inflammatory stenosis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains challenging without known predictive MR imaging features. Findings MR imaging/cholangiography exhibited low sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability for ductal cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis and lacks reliability for distinguishing between benign and malignant strictures. Clinical relevance Diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains challenging and our retrospective study demonstrates that MR imaging lacks reliability in distinguishing between benign and malignant high-grade strictures and did not find any specific MR feature of ductal CCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"6544-6553"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11606-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of MR imaging/cholangiography for ductal cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) diagnosis and to search for specific MR features of ductal CCA among primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients from a single center, each with a diagnosis of PSC, and suspicion of ductal CCA. Ductal CCA had been suspected during multidisciplinary team meetings when high-grade biliary stenosis was associated with focal thickening of the biliary wall. Two radiologists blinded to clinical information and imaging history independently reviewed patients' MR examinations using a standardized model created for this study. Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were used to analyze the population's characteristics. Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test were used to compare associations of categorical variables (each standard model's item) with the final diagnosis. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Cohen's κ coefficient.

Results: Our population had a mean age of 42.7 ± 13.6 years and included 68% males. The final diagnosis was ductal CCA for 14 patients, and inflammatory stenosis for 17 patients. For diagnosing CCA, MR imaging/cholangiography exhibited a sensitivity of 43-50% and specificity of 70-76%, with low positive predictive (58-60%) and negative predictive (62-63%) values. Interobserver agreement ranged from κ = 0.04-0.75. Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between individual MR imaging/cholangiography features and CCA diagnosis.

Conclusion: MR imaging/cholangiography showed suboptimal performance for ductal CCA diagnosis among PSC patients and we did not find any specific feature to distinguish ductal CCA from inflammatory stenosis.

Key points: Question Diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains challenging without known predictive MR imaging features. Findings MR imaging/cholangiography exhibited low sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability for ductal cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis and lacks reliability for distinguishing between benign and malignant strictures. Clinical relevance Diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains challenging and our retrospective study demonstrates that MR imaging lacks reliability in distinguishing between benign and malignant high-grade strictures and did not find any specific MR feature of ductal CCA.

磁共振成像和胆管造影对原发性硬化性胆管炎患者胆管癌的诊断效果不理想。
目的:我们的目的是评估MR成像/胆管造影在胆管癌(CCA)诊断中的表现,并寻找原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者胆管癌的特异性MR特征。方法:我们回顾性分析了来自单一中心的31例患者,每个患者都诊断为PSC,并怀疑导管CCA。在多学科小组会议上,当高度胆道狭窄与胆管壁局灶性增厚相关时,导管CCA被怀疑。两名不了解临床信息和影像学历史的放射科医生使用为本研究创建的标准化模型独立审查了患者的MR检查。用Fisher精确检验和学生t检验分析总体特征。使用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验来比较分类变量(每个标准模型的项目)与最终诊断的关联。采用Cohen’s κ系数评价观察者间一致性。结果:本组患者平均年龄为42.7±13.6岁,男性占68%。最终诊断为导管CCA 14例,炎性狭窄17例。对于CCA的诊断,MR成像/胆管造影的敏感性为43-50%,特异性为70-76%,阳性预测值低(58-60%),阴性预测值低(62-63%)。观察者间一致性范围为κ = 0.04-0.75。单因素分析显示,个体MR成像/胆管造影特征与CCA诊断之间无显著关联。结论:MR成像/胆管造影对PSC患者导管CCA的诊断效果不理想,我们没有发现任何特异性特征来区分导管CCA和炎症性狭窄。诊断原发性硬化性胆管炎患者的导管胆管癌仍然具有挑战性,没有已知的预测性MR成像特征。结果MR成像/胆管造影对原发性硬化性胆管炎中胆管癌诊断的敏感性、特异性和观察者间可靠性较低,在区分良恶性狭窄方面缺乏可靠性。原发性硬化性胆管炎患者的胆管癌诊断仍然具有挑战性,我们的回顾性研究表明,MR成像在区分良性和恶性高级别狭窄方面缺乏可靠性,并且没有发现导管CCA的任何特异性MR特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信