Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone in Treating Patients with Fibromyalgia: systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Abiodun Ologunowa, Marianne N Otoo, Aisling R Caffrey, Ashley Buchanan, Uche J Eze, Ami Vyas
{"title":"Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone in Treating Patients with Fibromyalgia: systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abiodun Ologunowa, Marianne N Otoo, Aisling R Caffrey, Ashley Buchanan, Uche J Eze, Ami Vyas","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2496526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has demonstrated mixed efficacy in treating fibromyalgia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LDN for fibromyalgia. We systematically searched electronic databases and gray literature from inception to May 2024. Included studies were clinical trials in humans published in English, reporting mean changes in pain scores and fibromyalgia symptom severity, comparing baseline to endpoint and LDN to placebo. Of 575 identified articles, eight met the eligibility criteria. In the LDN group, the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for pain decreased by 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.25, -0.80; I<sup>2</sup> = 25%), and fibromyalgia symptom severity decreased by 1.02 (95% CI: -1.35, -0.69; I<sup>2</sup> = 52%) post-LDN treatment compared to the baseline. However, no significant differences in mean change in pain (SMD -0.50, 95% CI: -1.19, 0.19; I<sup>2</sup> = 91%) and fibromyalgia symptoms severity scores (SMD -0.67, 95% CI: -1.67, 0.34; I<sup>2</sup> = 95%) were observed between the LDN and placebo groups. Although LDN marginally reduced pain and symptom severity from baseline, these effects were not superior to placebo. This suggests that LDN may not provide significant clinical benefit over placebo in fibromyalgia management, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"363-373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2496526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has demonstrated mixed efficacy in treating fibromyalgia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LDN for fibromyalgia. We systematically searched electronic databases and gray literature from inception to May 2024. Included studies were clinical trials in humans published in English, reporting mean changes in pain scores and fibromyalgia symptom severity, comparing baseline to endpoint and LDN to placebo. Of 575 identified articles, eight met the eligibility criteria. In the LDN group, the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for pain decreased by 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.25, -0.80; I2 = 25%), and fibromyalgia symptom severity decreased by 1.02 (95% CI: -1.35, -0.69; I2 = 52%) post-LDN treatment compared to the baseline. However, no significant differences in mean change in pain (SMD -0.50, 95% CI: -1.19, 0.19; I2 = 91%) and fibromyalgia symptoms severity scores (SMD -0.67, 95% CI: -1.67, 0.34; I2 = 95%) were observed between the LDN and placebo groups. Although LDN marginally reduced pain and symptom severity from baseline, these effects were not superior to placebo. This suggests that LDN may not provide significant clinical benefit over placebo in fibromyalgia management, warranting further research.

低剂量纳曲酮治疗纤维肌痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)治疗纤维肌痛的疗效参差不齐。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估LDN治疗纤维肌痛的疗效。我们系统地检索了从成立到2024年5月的电子数据库和灰色文献。纳入的研究是用英文发表的人类临床试验,报告疼痛评分和纤维肌痛症状严重程度的平均变化,比较基线与终点和LDN与安慰剂。在575篇被鉴定的文章中,有8篇符合资格标准。在LDN组,疼痛的标准化平均差(SMD)降低了1.03(95%可信区间(CI): -1.25, -0.80;I2 = 25%),纤维肌痛症状严重程度降低1.02 (95% CI: -1.35, -0.69;I2 = 52%),与基线相比。然而,疼痛的平均变化无显著差异(SMD -0.50, 95% CI: -1.19, 0.19;I2 = 91%)和纤维肌痛症状严重程度评分(SMD -0.67, 95% CI: -1.67, 0.34;I2 = 95%),在LDN组和安慰剂组之间观察到。虽然LDN从基线上略微减轻了疼痛和症状严重程度,但这些效果并不优于安慰剂。这表明LDN在治疗纤维肌痛方面可能没有比安慰剂更显著的临床益处,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信