Delayed but successful development of immune memory against SARS-COV-2 after B cell-depleting monotherapy.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nicolas Graf, Joseph Bayerl, Barbara Schmidt
{"title":"Delayed but successful development of immune memory against SARS-COV-2 after B cell-depleting monotherapy.","authors":"Nicolas Graf, Joseph Bayerl, Barbara Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02544-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients receiving CD20-directed therapies are known to insufficiently develop neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-COV-2 after two vaccinations. We investigated the impact of a third and fourth vaccination, possibly deriving predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a monocentric, prospective, non-interventional observational study patients who had received at least one administration of a monoclonal CD20 antibody (mCD20Ab) within 9 months prior to vaccination were included to receive mRNA-based third vaccination. SARS-COV-2 IgG titer was determined before and four weeks after immunisation. Patients without adequate humoral immune response proceeded to a fourth vaccination. Furthermore, tolerability and prespecified potentially influencing factors such as age, baseline lymphocyte counts and others were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients were included and vaccination was well tolerated. Quantitative analysis of humoral response four weeks after third vaccination revealed a significant increase which, however, did not translate into a clinically relevant seroconversion rate. In the subgroup analysis, patients older than 65 years and mCD20Ab therapy longer than 6 months ago benefited. All evaluable patients on mCD20Ab monotherapy (n = 7) showed an immediate or delayed immune response after third vaccination, while all non-responders (n = 7) were on combination therapy. Clinical parameters such as lymphocyte count, immunoglobulin status and others did not appear to have any influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An interval of at least 6 months after the last mCD20Ab administration and mCD20Ab monotherapy appears to be favorable for humoral immune response to third vaccination. Furthermore, patients can be reassured that delayed immune responses are possible. Future studies should therefore also investigate seroconversion at later time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02544-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients receiving CD20-directed therapies are known to insufficiently develop neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-COV-2 after two vaccinations. We investigated the impact of a third and fourth vaccination, possibly deriving predictive factors.

Methods: In a monocentric, prospective, non-interventional observational study patients who had received at least one administration of a monoclonal CD20 antibody (mCD20Ab) within 9 months prior to vaccination were included to receive mRNA-based third vaccination. SARS-COV-2 IgG titer was determined before and four weeks after immunisation. Patients without adequate humoral immune response proceeded to a fourth vaccination. Furthermore, tolerability and prespecified potentially influencing factors such as age, baseline lymphocyte counts and others were analysed.

Results: Twenty-four patients were included and vaccination was well tolerated. Quantitative analysis of humoral response four weeks after third vaccination revealed a significant increase which, however, did not translate into a clinically relevant seroconversion rate. In the subgroup analysis, patients older than 65 years and mCD20Ab therapy longer than 6 months ago benefited. All evaluable patients on mCD20Ab monotherapy (n = 7) showed an immediate or delayed immune response after third vaccination, while all non-responders (n = 7) were on combination therapy. Clinical parameters such as lymphocyte count, immunoglobulin status and others did not appear to have any influence.

Conclusion: An interval of at least 6 months after the last mCD20Ab administration and mCD20Ab monotherapy appears to be favorable for humoral immune response to third vaccination. Furthermore, patients can be reassured that delayed immune responses are possible. Future studies should therefore also investigate seroconversion at later time points.

B细胞消耗单一疗法后针对SARS-COV-2的延迟但成功的免疫记忆发展
目的:已知接受cd20定向治疗的患者在两次接种后不能充分产生针对SARS-COV-2的中和抗体滴度。我们调查了第三次和第四次疫苗接种的影响,可能得出预测因素。方法:在一项单中心、前瞻性、非介入性观察研究中,接种前9个月内至少接受过一次单克隆CD20抗体(mCD20Ab)的患者接受基于mrna的第三次疫苗接种。免疫前和免疫后4周检测SARS-COV-2 IgG滴度。没有足够体液免疫反应的患者进行第四次疫苗接种。此外,还分析了耐受性和预先指定的潜在影响因素,如年龄、基线淋巴细胞计数等。结果:24例患者接种疫苗耐受良好。第三次疫苗接种后4周的体液应答定量分析显示显著增加,但没有转化为临床相关的血清转换率。在亚组分析中,年龄大于65岁且mCD20Ab治疗时间超过6个月的患者受益。所有接受mCD20Ab单药治疗的可评估患者(n = 7)在第三次疫苗接种后显示立即或延迟免疫应答,而所有无应答的患者(n = 7)接受联合治疗。临床参数,如淋巴细胞计数,免疫球蛋白状态和其他似乎没有任何影响。结论:在最后一次mCD20Ab和mCD20Ab单药治疗后至少6个月的间隔有利于第三次疫苗接种的体液免疫应答。此外,患者可以放心,延迟免疫反应是可能的。因此,未来的研究也应该在以后的时间点调查血清转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信