Development of a test design for a semi-field, colony-feeding study for the common eastern bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Ana R Cabrera, John Hanzas, Pamela Jensen, Dwayne R J Moore, Daniel R Schmehl
{"title":"Development of a test design for a semi-field, colony-feeding study for the common eastern bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae).","authors":"Ana R Cabrera, John Hanzas, Pamela Jensen, Dwayne R J Moore, Daniel R Schmehl","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological risk assessment is a key component of the regulatory process required for registration of crop protection products around the world. The western honey bee (Apis mellifera) is the model organism for pesticide risk assessments for bees, but there are uncertainties over whether it is predictive of risks to other bees. Consequently, efforts are underway to develop test methodologies for other non-Apis bees. We conducted a semi-field colony-feeding study with Bombus impatiens colonies to develop a colony-level methodology for bumble bees. We exposed commercially available bumble bee colonies to diets consisting of 4 concentration treatments of dimethoate insecticide (0.05, 0.19, 0.75, and 3.0 mg a.i./L) via supplemental sugar solution for 6 wk and compared exposed colonies to untreated controls. Each treatment group had 10 replicate colonies, with 1 replicate per treatment group represented at each of the 10 study rural locations. We collected data on various colony-level endpoints including production of female reproductive (gyne) offspring, colony weight, foraging activity, and consumption of provisioned sugar solution. Our results indicated that the test design could be used to derive concentration-response relationships for several endpoints including the most sensitive, colony mass (No Observed Adverse Effect Concentration = 0.05 mg a.i./L). Overall, our study provides the foundation for a semi-field, colony-feeding study test design for bumble bees, thus adding to the growing body of studies that may be used to assess the protectiveness of the honey bee risk assessment framework for non-Apis bees exposed to pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":" ","pages":"544-552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvaf020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological risk assessment is a key component of the regulatory process required for registration of crop protection products around the world. The western honey bee (Apis mellifera) is the model organism for pesticide risk assessments for bees, but there are uncertainties over whether it is predictive of risks to other bees. Consequently, efforts are underway to develop test methodologies for other non-Apis bees. We conducted a semi-field colony-feeding study with Bombus impatiens colonies to develop a colony-level methodology for bumble bees. We exposed commercially available bumble bee colonies to diets consisting of 4 concentration treatments of dimethoate insecticide (0.05, 0.19, 0.75, and 3.0 mg a.i./L) via supplemental sugar solution for 6 wk and compared exposed colonies to untreated controls. Each treatment group had 10 replicate colonies, with 1 replicate per treatment group represented at each of the 10 study rural locations. We collected data on various colony-level endpoints including production of female reproductive (gyne) offspring, colony weight, foraging activity, and consumption of provisioned sugar solution. Our results indicated that the test design could be used to derive concentration-response relationships for several endpoints including the most sensitive, colony mass (No Observed Adverse Effect Concentration = 0.05 mg a.i./L). Overall, our study provides the foundation for a semi-field, colony-feeding study test design for bumble bees, thus adding to the growing body of studies that may be used to assess the protectiveness of the honey bee risk assessment framework for non-Apis bees exposed to pesticides.

对普通东部大黄蜂(膜翅目:蜂科)进行半场、群体摄食研究的试验设计。
生态风险评估是世界各地作物保护产品注册所需的监管程序的关键组成部分。西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)是蜜蜂农药风险评估的模式生物,但它是否能预测其他蜜蜂的风险还存在不确定性。因此,正在努力开发其他非api蜜蜂的测试方法。本研究以大黄蜂为研究对象,进行了半野外的蜂群摄食研究,以建立一种蜂群水平的方法。我们将市售的大黄蜂群体暴露在由4种浓度处理(0.05、0.19、0.75和3.0 mg a.i./L)组成的饮食中,通过补充糖溶液,持续6周,并将暴露的群体与未处理的对照组进行比较。每个处理组有10个重复菌落,每个处理组在10个农村研究地点各有1个重复。我们收集了不同群体水平端点的数据,包括雌性生殖后代的产量、群体体重、觅食活动和提供的糖溶液的消耗。我们的结果表明,该试验设计可用于推导几个终点的浓度-响应关系,包括最敏感的菌落质量(未观察到不良反应浓度= 0.05 mg a.i./L)。总的来说,我们的研究为大黄蜂的半场、群体喂养研究试验设计提供了基础,从而增加了越来越多的研究,可用于评估蜜蜂风险评估框架对暴露于杀虫剂的非apis蜜蜂的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信