In Vitro Comparison of an Aspherical Monofocal Lens Inducing Positive Spherical Aberrations With a Spherical Lens.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Benjamin Stern, Alain Saad, Damien Gatinel
{"title":"In Vitro Comparison of an Aspherical Monofocal Lens Inducing Positive Spherical Aberrations With a Spherical Lens.","authors":"Benjamin Stern, Alain Saad, Damien Gatinel","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250403-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the in vitro performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with an aspherical design inducing positive spherical aberrations (APSA IOL, RayOne EMV; Rayner), and a spherical lens (RayOne Spheric; Rayner).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vitro wavefront measurements were conducted on 10.00, 20.00, and 30.00 diopter (D) lenses. The average through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) (0 to 50 lp/mm) was generated for 168 synthetic numerical eye models with varying aperture sizes (2.0 to 5.5 mm) and corneal spherical aberration values (-0.49 to 0.91 µm). Evaluated metrics included MTFmax (peak MTF value) and depth of focus (DOF), defined as half of the dioptric range in the spectacle plane where the MTF exceeds 0.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In physiological corneal models, APSA IOLs demonstrated enhanced MTFmax and DOF in larger apertures in high power lenses (30.00 D); a similar, although less pronounced, pattern was observed at 20.00 D. For low-power (10.00 D) lenses, APSA IOLs provided superior MTFmax in large apertures but exhibited a moderate trade-off in mid-sized apertures. In non-physiological corneal models with high SA, both APSA IOLs and spherical lenses showed reduced MTFmax in larger apertures. Conversely, in negative spherical aberration models, they provided excellent MTF-max but limited DOF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In normal eyes, APSA IOLs offer better contrast rendering and DOF in high-power lenses due to the controlled induction of positive spherical aberration. However, in medium-power and low-power lenses, the benefits are less evident, with low-power lenses showing reduced contrast in mid-sized pupils. Caution is advised for both models following myopic corneal refractive surgery, although they perform well after hyperopic treatment. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e481-e491.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e481-e491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250403-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the in vitro performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with an aspherical design inducing positive spherical aberrations (APSA IOL, RayOne EMV; Rayner), and a spherical lens (RayOne Spheric; Rayner).

Methods: In vitro wavefront measurements were conducted on 10.00, 20.00, and 30.00 diopter (D) lenses. The average through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) (0 to 50 lp/mm) was generated for 168 synthetic numerical eye models with varying aperture sizes (2.0 to 5.5 mm) and corneal spherical aberration values (-0.49 to 0.91 µm). Evaluated metrics included MTFmax (peak MTF value) and depth of focus (DOF), defined as half of the dioptric range in the spectacle plane where the MTF exceeds 0.3.

Results: In physiological corneal models, APSA IOLs demonstrated enhanced MTFmax and DOF in larger apertures in high power lenses (30.00 D); a similar, although less pronounced, pattern was observed at 20.00 D. For low-power (10.00 D) lenses, APSA IOLs provided superior MTFmax in large apertures but exhibited a moderate trade-off in mid-sized apertures. In non-physiological corneal models with high SA, both APSA IOLs and spherical lenses showed reduced MTFmax in larger apertures. Conversely, in negative spherical aberration models, they provided excellent MTF-max but limited DOF.

Conclusions: In normal eyes, APSA IOLs offer better contrast rendering and DOF in high-power lenses due to the controlled induction of positive spherical aberration. However, in medium-power and low-power lenses, the benefits are less evident, with low-power lenses showing reduced contrast in mid-sized pupils. Caution is advised for both models following myopic corneal refractive surgery, although they perform well after hyperopic treatment. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e481-e491.].

非球面单焦点透镜与球面透镜诱导正球像差的体外比较。
目的:比较单焦点人工晶状体(APSA IOL)和非球面人工晶状体(RayOne EMV;RayOne sphere;雷纳)。方法:分别在屈光度为10.00、20.00、30.00的晶状体上进行体外波前测量。对不同孔径(2.0 ~ 5.5 mm)和角膜球差(-0.49 ~ 0.91µm)的168个合成数值眼模型,生成平均过焦调制传递函数(MTF) (0 ~ 50 lp/mm)。评估指标包括MTFmax(峰值MTF值)和焦深(DOF),定义为MTF超过0.3的视场平面屈光度范围的一半。结果:在生理角膜模型中,APSA人工晶状体在大孔径高倍镜(30.00 D)下MTFmax和DOF显著提高;类似的,虽然不太明显,在20.00 D时观察到的模式。对于低功率(10.00 D)的镜头,APSA iol在大孔径下提供了优越的MTFmax,但在中等孔径下表现出适度的权衡。在高SA的非生理性角膜模型中,APSA iol和球面晶状体在大孔径下均显示MTFmax降低。相反,在负球差模型中,它们提供了出色的MTF-max,但DOF有限。结论:在正常眼睛中,APSA人工晶状体由于控制正球差的诱导,在高倍透镜中提供了更好的对比度和DOF。然而,在中等和低倍率的隐形眼镜中,这种好处就不那么明显了,在中等大小的瞳孔中,低倍率的隐形眼镜的对比度会降低。尽管在远视治疗后表现良好,但建议在近视角膜屈光手术后使用这两种模型。[J].中国光学精密工程,2015;41(5):391 - 391。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信