{"title":"In Vitro Comparison of an Aspherical Monofocal Lens Inducing Positive Spherical Aberrations With a Spherical Lens.","authors":"Benjamin Stern, Alain Saad, Damien Gatinel","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250403-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the in vitro performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with an aspherical design inducing positive spherical aberrations (APSA IOL, RayOne EMV; Rayner), and a spherical lens (RayOne Spheric; Rayner).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vitro wavefront measurements were conducted on 10.00, 20.00, and 30.00 diopter (D) lenses. The average through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) (0 to 50 lp/mm) was generated for 168 synthetic numerical eye models with varying aperture sizes (2.0 to 5.5 mm) and corneal spherical aberration values (-0.49 to 0.91 µm). Evaluated metrics included MTFmax (peak MTF value) and depth of focus (DOF), defined as half of the dioptric range in the spectacle plane where the MTF exceeds 0.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In physiological corneal models, APSA IOLs demonstrated enhanced MTFmax and DOF in larger apertures in high power lenses (30.00 D); a similar, although less pronounced, pattern was observed at 20.00 D. For low-power (10.00 D) lenses, APSA IOLs provided superior MTFmax in large apertures but exhibited a moderate trade-off in mid-sized apertures. In non-physiological corneal models with high SA, both APSA IOLs and spherical lenses showed reduced MTFmax in larger apertures. Conversely, in negative spherical aberration models, they provided excellent MTF-max but limited DOF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In normal eyes, APSA IOLs offer better contrast rendering and DOF in high-power lenses due to the controlled induction of positive spherical aberration. However, in medium-power and low-power lenses, the benefits are less evident, with low-power lenses showing reduced contrast in mid-sized pupils. Caution is advised for both models following myopic corneal refractive surgery, although they perform well after hyperopic treatment. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e481-e491.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e481-e491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250403-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the in vitro performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with an aspherical design inducing positive spherical aberrations (APSA IOL, RayOne EMV; Rayner), and a spherical lens (RayOne Spheric; Rayner).
Methods: In vitro wavefront measurements were conducted on 10.00, 20.00, and 30.00 diopter (D) lenses. The average through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) (0 to 50 lp/mm) was generated for 168 synthetic numerical eye models with varying aperture sizes (2.0 to 5.5 mm) and corneal spherical aberration values (-0.49 to 0.91 µm). Evaluated metrics included MTFmax (peak MTF value) and depth of focus (DOF), defined as half of the dioptric range in the spectacle plane where the MTF exceeds 0.3.
Results: In physiological corneal models, APSA IOLs demonstrated enhanced MTFmax and DOF in larger apertures in high power lenses (30.00 D); a similar, although less pronounced, pattern was observed at 20.00 D. For low-power (10.00 D) lenses, APSA IOLs provided superior MTFmax in large apertures but exhibited a moderate trade-off in mid-sized apertures. In non-physiological corneal models with high SA, both APSA IOLs and spherical lenses showed reduced MTFmax in larger apertures. Conversely, in negative spherical aberration models, they provided excellent MTF-max but limited DOF.
Conclusions: In normal eyes, APSA IOLs offer better contrast rendering and DOF in high-power lenses due to the controlled induction of positive spherical aberration. However, in medium-power and low-power lenses, the benefits are less evident, with low-power lenses showing reduced contrast in mid-sized pupils. Caution is advised for both models following myopic corneal refractive surgery, although they perform well after hyperopic treatment. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e481-e491.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.