Evaluation of the implementation and the associated operating costs of a medicine regulatory harmonisation model in Africa: the case of ZaZiBoNa, a SADC work-sharing initiative.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2490565
S Dube-Mwedzi, F Suleman
{"title":"Evaluation of the implementation and the associated operating costs of a medicine regulatory harmonisation model in Africa: the case of ZaZiBoNa, a SADC work-sharing initiative.","authors":"S Dube-Mwedzi, F Suleman","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2490565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve the access to and affordability of medicines, countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) established ZaZiBoNa, a medicine regulatory harmonisation initiative. Studies have evaluated the initiative's technical and operational efficiencies and effectiveness. This study evaluated ZaZiBoNa from project implementation and cost perspectives, at the 5-year mark, to establish a business case for further investment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative and desk review were undertaken. Two surveys, one with 7 National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) that participated in the initiative in the initial 5 years were conducted and the other with 40 pharmaceutical companies who submitted applications in the same period were recruited to share their perceived experiences and expectations with the collaborative initiative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 7 NRAs agreed the initiative had generally achieved its objectives and participation was beneficiary. As of June 2022, the 7 NRAs had registered 152 of the 235 (64.7%) products assessed during the study period, with a median time from joint assessment recommendations to registration of 7 months, against a target of 3 months (range: 4 to 14 months). Of the industry respondents (<i>n</i> = 13), 61.5% indicated the initiative had had a positive impact on their business, though expectations were only met to some degree (31%-46%). Failure to create a less expensive process and to facilitate simultaneous multiple market access (31% and 23% respectively) were the most common unmet expectations. Nonetheless, 62% of the industry respondents expressed willingness to continue utilising the collaborative process. The cost per joint assessment recommendation during the study period was USD 2,768.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study also highlighted that implementation of initiatives could take time and that some goals can only be achieved in the medium to long term. This is a lesson for other collaboration initiatives in Africa, such as the African Medicines Agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2490565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12024501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2490565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To improve the access to and affordability of medicines, countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) established ZaZiBoNa, a medicine regulatory harmonisation initiative. Studies have evaluated the initiative's technical and operational efficiencies and effectiveness. This study evaluated ZaZiBoNa from project implementation and cost perspectives, at the 5-year mark, to establish a business case for further investment.

Methods: A quantitative and desk review were undertaken. Two surveys, one with 7 National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) that participated in the initiative in the initial 5 years were conducted and the other with 40 pharmaceutical companies who submitted applications in the same period were recruited to share their perceived experiences and expectations with the collaborative initiative.

Results: All 7 NRAs agreed the initiative had generally achieved its objectives and participation was beneficiary. As of June 2022, the 7 NRAs had registered 152 of the 235 (64.7%) products assessed during the study period, with a median time from joint assessment recommendations to registration of 7 months, against a target of 3 months (range: 4 to 14 months). Of the industry respondents (n = 13), 61.5% indicated the initiative had had a positive impact on their business, though expectations were only met to some degree (31%-46%). Failure to create a less expensive process and to facilitate simultaneous multiple market access (31% and 23% respectively) were the most common unmet expectations. Nonetheless, 62% of the industry respondents expressed willingness to continue utilising the collaborative process. The cost per joint assessment recommendation during the study period was USD 2,768.

Conclusion: The study also highlighted that implementation of initiatives could take time and that some goals can only be achieved in the medium to long term. This is a lesson for other collaboration initiatives in Africa, such as the African Medicines Agency.

对非洲药品监管协调模式的实施和相关运营成本的评估:以南部非洲发展共同体的一项工作分享倡议ZaZiBoNa为例。
背景:为了改善药品的可及性和可负担性,南部非洲发展共同体(SADC)国家建立了药品监管协调倡议ZaZiBoNa。研究评估了该倡议的技术和操作效率和效力。本研究从项目实施和成本的角度评估了ZaZiBoNa,在5年的时间里,为进一步的投资建立了一个商业案例。方法:进行定量和桌面回顾。进行了两项调查,一项是对在最初5年参与该倡议的7个国家监管机构(NRAs)进行的调查,另一项是对同期提交申请的40家制药公司进行的调查,以分享他们对合作倡议的感知经验和期望。结果:所有7家nra都认为该倡议总体上实现了其目标,参与是受益者。截至2022年6月,在研究期间评估的235种产品中,7家nra注册了152种(64.7%),从联合评估建议到注册的中位时间为7个月,而目标为3个月(范围:4至14个月)。在行业受访者(n = 13)中,61.5%的人表示该计划对他们的业务产生了积极影响,尽管只是在一定程度上达到了预期(31%-46%)。未能创造更便宜的流程和促进同时多个市场准入(分别为31%和23%)是最常见的未实现期望。尽管如此,62%的行业受访者表示愿意继续使用协作流程。在研究期间,每项联合评估建议的费用为2 768美元。结论:该研究还强调,倡议的实施可能需要时间,一些目标只能在中长期内实现。这是非洲其他合作倡议的一个教训,例如非洲药品管理局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信