A Comparative Study of Growth Patterns in Microdisks and Normal-Sized Optic Disks Using OCT.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-04-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/2626221
Rita Gama, Rute Sousa Costa, Tânia Yang
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Growth Patterns in Microdisks and Normal-Sized Optic Disks Using OCT.","authors":"Rita Gama, Rute Sousa Costa, Tânia Yang","doi":"10.1155/joph/2626221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) and inner retinal layer thickness between children and adults with microdisks (MDs) and normal-sized disks (NSDs) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). <b>Methods:</b> A case-control study that included 172 eyes. Four groups of patients were created and matched according to gender and disk size: 41 children with MD (disk size between 1.42 and 1.60 mm<sup>2</sup>), 41 adults with MD, 45 children with NSD (disk size between 1.80 and 2.30 mm<sup>2</sup>), and 45 adults with NSD. All subjects were imaged with spectral domain OCT. Neuroretinal rim (NRR) area, cup-disk ratio (CDR), cup volume, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness were obtained. <b>Results:</b> There was a statistical difference in the NRR area (<i>p</i> < 0.001), average CDR (<i>p</i> < 0.001), cup volume (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and average pRNFL thickness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) between children and adults with NSD. However, comparing children and adults with MD, the only differences found were the NRR area and nasal pRNFL thickness (<i>p</i> = 0.009 and 0.010, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, the ONH parameters and pRNFL thickness are different in children and adults with NSD. On the contrary, MD belonging to children and adults did not have significant differences in ONH parameters and inner retinal layer thickness. According to these findings, the evaluation of a glaucomatous lesion in MD should rely on the ONH parameters and an increase in the cup volume must raise the suspicion of glaucomatous damage, because the physiological enlargement of the cup with age in a MD with age is not to be expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2626221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/2626221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) and inner retinal layer thickness between children and adults with microdisks (MDs) and normal-sized disks (NSDs) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: A case-control study that included 172 eyes. Four groups of patients were created and matched according to gender and disk size: 41 children with MD (disk size between 1.42 and 1.60 mm2), 41 adults with MD, 45 children with NSD (disk size between 1.80 and 2.30 mm2), and 45 adults with NSD. All subjects were imaged with spectral domain OCT. Neuroretinal rim (NRR) area, cup-disk ratio (CDR), cup volume, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness were obtained. Results: There was a statistical difference in the NRR area (p < 0.001), average CDR (p < 0.001), cup volume (p < 0.001), and average pRNFL thickness (p < 0.001) between children and adults with NSD. However, comparing children and adults with MD, the only differences found were the NRR area and nasal pRNFL thickness (p = 0.009 and 0.010, respectively). Conclusions: In conclusion, the ONH parameters and pRNFL thickness are different in children and adults with NSD. On the contrary, MD belonging to children and adults did not have significant differences in ONH parameters and inner retinal layer thickness. According to these findings, the evaluation of a glaucomatous lesion in MD should rely on the ONH parameters and an increase in the cup volume must raise the suspicion of glaucomatous damage, because the physiological enlargement of the cup with age in a MD with age is not to be expected.

利用OCT对微盘和正常尺寸视盘生长模式的比较研究。
目的:利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)比较儿童和成人微盘(MDs)和正常大小盘(NSDs)视神经头(ONH)参数和视网膜内层厚度。方法:纳入172只眼的病例对照研究。根据性别和磁盘大小创建并匹配四组患者:41例MD儿童(磁盘大小在1.42至1.60 mm2之间),41例MD成人,45例NSD儿童(磁盘大小在1.80至2.30 mm2之间)和45例NSD成人。所有受试者进行oct光谱域成像,获得视网膜神经边缘(NRR)面积、杯盘比(CDR)、杯体积、乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(pRNFL)厚度、黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层(mGCIPL)厚度。结果:两组NRR区差异有统计学意义(p p p p分别= 0.009、0.010)。结论:儿童与成人NSD患者的ONH参数及pRNFL厚度存在差异。相反,儿童MD和成人MD在ONH参数和视网膜内层厚度上没有显著差异。根据这些发现,评估MD的青光眼病变应依赖于ONH参数,杯子体积的增加必须引起青光眼损害的怀疑,因为随着年龄的增长,MD的杯子随着年龄的增长是不可预期的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信