Optimizing dwell time weight for interstitial needles in intracavitary/interstitial hybrid brachytherapy: balancing tumor coverage with organ sparing using the inverse planning technique.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Jun Takatsu, Naoya Murakami, Noriyuki Okonogi, Tatsuya Inoue, Kotaro Iijima, Yoichi Muramoto, Yasuo Kosugi, Terufumi Kawamoto, Tatsuki Karino, Yasuhisa Terao, Naoto Shikama
{"title":"Optimizing dwell time weight for interstitial needles in intracavitary/interstitial hybrid brachytherapy: balancing tumor coverage with organ sparing using the inverse planning technique.","authors":"Jun Takatsu, Naoya Murakami, Noriyuki Okonogi, Tatsuya Inoue, Kotaro Iijima, Yoichi Muramoto, Yasuo Kosugi, Terufumi Kawamoto, Tatsuki Karino, Yasuhisa Terao, Naoto Shikama","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recommended dwell time weight of the needle in intracavitary/interstitial hybrid brachytherapy (HBT) has been 10-20%. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the weight constraint of the needle and normal organ doses in uterine cervical cancer HBT. This study included 30 cervical cancer patients who received HBT with tandem/ovoid applicators. In our clinical practice, treatment plans were generated without the constraint of the dwell time weight of the needle. The cases where this weight exceeded 20% were replanned. An inverse planning technique with locking downscaled needle dwell time was used to reproduce isodose lines of clinical plans. Replanning repeated with downscaling of the dwell time until the weight of the needle fell <20% (Needle-Lock plan). The Needle-Lock plans were rescaled to coincide with the high-risk clinical target volumes D90 of clinical plans. D2cc in normal organs and the overdose area >200% of the prescribed dose were evaluated. In 17 of 30 (56.7%) clinical plans, the weight of the needle exceeded 20%. The rectum, bladder and sigmoid colon D2cc significantly increased with the Needle-Lock plan. The overdosage area also increased significantly (P < 0.01). The correlations between the needle number and the increase of D2cc in the rectum and sigmoid colon (P < 0.01) were statistically significant. Limiting needle dwell time weight by 10-20% increased bladder and rectum doses, especially with multiple needles. These findings suggest that needle dwell time weight recommendations could need to be reconsidered based on individual and institutional situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"296-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recommended dwell time weight of the needle in intracavitary/interstitial hybrid brachytherapy (HBT) has been 10-20%. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the weight constraint of the needle and normal organ doses in uterine cervical cancer HBT. This study included 30 cervical cancer patients who received HBT with tandem/ovoid applicators. In our clinical practice, treatment plans were generated without the constraint of the dwell time weight of the needle. The cases where this weight exceeded 20% were replanned. An inverse planning technique with locking downscaled needle dwell time was used to reproduce isodose lines of clinical plans. Replanning repeated with downscaling of the dwell time until the weight of the needle fell <20% (Needle-Lock plan). The Needle-Lock plans were rescaled to coincide with the high-risk clinical target volumes D90 of clinical plans. D2cc in normal organs and the overdose area >200% of the prescribed dose were evaluated. In 17 of 30 (56.7%) clinical plans, the weight of the needle exceeded 20%. The rectum, bladder and sigmoid colon D2cc significantly increased with the Needle-Lock plan. The overdosage area also increased significantly (P < 0.01). The correlations between the needle number and the increase of D2cc in the rectum and sigmoid colon (P < 0.01) were statistically significant. Limiting needle dwell time weight by 10-20% increased bladder and rectum doses, especially with multiple needles. These findings suggest that needle dwell time weight recommendations could need to be reconsidered based on individual and institutional situation.

优化腔内/间质混合近距离放疗中间质针的停留时间权重:利用逆计划技术平衡肿瘤覆盖与器官保留。
腔内/间质混合近距离放射治疗(HBT)的推荐停留时间重量为10-20%。本研究旨在探讨宫颈癌HBT中针的重量约束与正常器官剂量的关系。本研究包括30例使用串联/卵形涂抹器接受HBT的宫颈癌患者。在我们的临床实践中,治疗方案的制定不受针头停留时间重量的限制。重量超过20%的案例被重新规划。反向计划技术与锁定缩小针头停留时间用于重现等剂量线的临床计划。随着停留时间的缩小,重新计划反复进行,直到针头的重量下降到规定剂量的200%。30例临床方案中有17例(56.7%)针头重量超过20%。Needle-Lock组直肠、膀胱及乙状结肠D2cc明显增高。过量用药面积也显著增加(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信