Limited effects of fluorine-free foam alternatives on gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) larval development in laboratory and mesocosm studies.

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jason T Hoverman, Devin K Jones, Melissa E Lech, Grace A Bianchi, David L Haskins, Elizabeth G Hoffman, Alyssa E Johnson, Jack D Morehouse, Sarah J Pfisterer, Katie A Quinlin, Abigail C Valachovic, Maggie A Wigren, Youn J Choi, Maria S Sepúlveda, Linda S Lee
{"title":"Limited effects of fluorine-free foam alternatives on gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) larval development in laboratory and mesocosm studies.","authors":"Jason T Hoverman, Devin K Jones, Melissa E Lech, Grace A Bianchi, David L Haskins, Elizabeth G Hoffman, Alyssa E Johnson, Jack D Morehouse, Sarah J Pfisterer, Katie A Quinlin, Abigail C Valachovic, Maggie A Wigren, Youn J Choi, Maria S Sepúlveda, Linda S Lee","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used extensively for decades to rapidly extinguish hydrocarbon fires. Given PFAS persistence, propensity to bioaccumulate, and potential wildlife and human health risks, focus has shifted to developing fluorine-free foam (F3) alternatives. However, the toxicity of these alternatives to wildlife is largely unknown. We assessed the toxicity of F3 alternatives to gray treefrogs using both laboratory and outdoor mesocosm studies. Overall, gray treefrogs were relatively tolerant of chronic F3 alternative exposure. Across both experimental venues, there was limited evidence that metamorphic endpoints (e.g., time to metamorphosis, size at metamorphosis, survival to metamorphosis) were negatively affected by F3 alternatives compared to the control treatments. In contrast, the PFAS-containing AFFF Buckeye reduced survival and delayed metamorphosis at the highest concentration tested in the laboratory experiment. Despite minimal effects of the formulations on growth and development, behavioral observations of the outdoor mesocosm experiment found that tadpoles were using refuges more often (ie 19-30% fewer tadpoles seen) with several of the F3 alternatives and the AFFF. While this behavioral effect did not alter the growth or development of the gray treefrogs, there is the potential for such behavioral shifts to influence the outcome of ecological interactions (e.g., predation, parasitism, competition). It will be important to continue building on this work while also examining the fate and transport of these alternatives in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems to inform ecological risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used extensively for decades to rapidly extinguish hydrocarbon fires. Given PFAS persistence, propensity to bioaccumulate, and potential wildlife and human health risks, focus has shifted to developing fluorine-free foam (F3) alternatives. However, the toxicity of these alternatives to wildlife is largely unknown. We assessed the toxicity of F3 alternatives to gray treefrogs using both laboratory and outdoor mesocosm studies. Overall, gray treefrogs were relatively tolerant of chronic F3 alternative exposure. Across both experimental venues, there was limited evidence that metamorphic endpoints (e.g., time to metamorphosis, size at metamorphosis, survival to metamorphosis) were negatively affected by F3 alternatives compared to the control treatments. In contrast, the PFAS-containing AFFF Buckeye reduced survival and delayed metamorphosis at the highest concentration tested in the laboratory experiment. Despite minimal effects of the formulations on growth and development, behavioral observations of the outdoor mesocosm experiment found that tadpoles were using refuges more often (ie 19-30% fewer tadpoles seen) with several of the F3 alternatives and the AFFF. While this behavioral effect did not alter the growth or development of the gray treefrogs, there is the potential for such behavioral shifts to influence the outcome of ecological interactions (e.g., predation, parasitism, competition). It will be important to continue building on this work while also examining the fate and transport of these alternatives in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems to inform ecological risk assessments.

在实验室和环境研究中,无氟泡沫替代品对灰树蛙幼虫发育的有限影响。
含有全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的水成膜泡沫(AFFF)几十年来被广泛用于快速扑灭碳氢化合物火灾。考虑到PFAS的持久性、生物积累倾向以及潜在的野生动物和人类健康风险,重点已转向开发无氟泡沫(F3)替代品。然而,这些野生动物替代品的毒性在很大程度上是未知的。我们通过室内和室外环境研究评估了F3替代品对灰树蛙的毒性。总体而言,灰树蛙对慢性F3替代暴露相对耐受。在两个实验场所,有有限的证据表明,与对照处理相比,F3替代方案对变质终点(例如,蜕变时间,蜕变大小,蜕变存活率)有负面影响。相反,在实验室实验中,含pfas的AFFF在最高浓度时降低了七叶树的存活率并延迟了变态。尽管配方对生长发育的影响很小,但户外中生态实验的行为观察发现,使用几种F3替代品和AFFF的蝌蚪使用避难所的次数更多(即看到的蝌蚪数量减少19-30%)。虽然这种行为效应不会改变灰树蛙的生长或发育,但这种行为转变有可能影响生态相互作用的结果(例如,捕食、寄生、竞争)。重要的是在这项工作的基础上继续努力,同时也要审查这些替代品在水生和陆地生态系统中的命运和运输,为生态风险评估提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信