Transferability in three dimensions (3D): applicability, theoretical engagement, and resonance.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Megan E L Brown, Renée E Stalmeijer, Bridget C O'Brien
{"title":"Transferability in three dimensions (3D): applicability, theoretical engagement, and resonance.","authors":"Megan E L Brown, Renée E Stalmeijer, Bridget C O'Brien","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10439-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though transferability is a multidimensional concept, our representations of transferability within Health Professions Education have largely focused on whether innovations or outcomes can be applied in different contexts. However, transferability has been variously described and used as a quality criterion through the history of qualitative research. To capture the complexity of this concept we propose a tri-dimensional conceptualisation of transferability, drawing on foundational qualitative research literature and our own experiences as qualitative researchers. We consider the origins of transferability within qualitative and Health Professions Education research, including its association with the concept of generalisability. We draw attention to shifts in debate, and the need for a clear conceptualisation of transferability as a concept. The three dimensions we propose, as part of our 3D transferability model, are: applicability; theoretical engagement; and resonance. By exploring these three dimensions, we highlight the importance of a critical, multifaceted approach to understanding and operationalising transferability. To promote practical application, we make suggestions regarding the use and discussion of each dimension of transferability. In doing so, we hope this exploration will be useful for scholars seeking to achieve broader impact of their evaluative work and empirical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10439-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though transferability is a multidimensional concept, our representations of transferability within Health Professions Education have largely focused on whether innovations or outcomes can be applied in different contexts. However, transferability has been variously described and used as a quality criterion through the history of qualitative research. To capture the complexity of this concept we propose a tri-dimensional conceptualisation of transferability, drawing on foundational qualitative research literature and our own experiences as qualitative researchers. We consider the origins of transferability within qualitative and Health Professions Education research, including its association with the concept of generalisability. We draw attention to shifts in debate, and the need for a clear conceptualisation of transferability as a concept. The three dimensions we propose, as part of our 3D transferability model, are: applicability; theoretical engagement; and resonance. By exploring these three dimensions, we highlight the importance of a critical, multifaceted approach to understanding and operationalising transferability. To promote practical application, we make suggestions regarding the use and discussion of each dimension of transferability. In doing so, we hope this exploration will be useful for scholars seeking to achieve broader impact of their evaluative work and empirical research.

可转移性在三个维度(3D):适用性,理论参与,和共鸣。
虽然可转移性是一个多维概念,但我们在卫生专业教育中对可转移性的表述主要集中在创新或成果是否可以应用于不同的背景。然而,通过定性研究的历史,可转移性已经被不同地描述和用作质量标准。为了抓住这个概念的复杂性,我们提出了一个可转移性的三维概念化,借鉴了基础定性研究文献和我们自己作为定性研究人员的经验。我们在定性和卫生专业教育研究中考虑可转移性的起源,包括其与普遍性概念的关联。我们提请注意辩论中的转变,以及需要将可转移性作为一个概念明确概念化。作为3D可转移性模型的一部分,我们提出的三个维度是:适用性;理论参与;和共振。通过探索这三个维度,我们强调了理解和操作可转移性的关键、多方面方法的重要性。为了促进实际应用,我们对可转移性的各个维度的使用和讨论提出了建议。在这样做的过程中,我们希望这一探索将对寻求实现其评估工作和实证研究的更广泛影响的学者有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信