Effectiveness and safety of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1177/03000605251333654
Long Wang, Lequ Zeng, Yuyu Wu, Min Zhong, Lizhen Zhang, Chen Li
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Long Wang, Lequ Zeng, Yuyu Wu, Min Zhong, Lizhen Zhang, Chen Li","doi":"10.1177/03000605251333654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.MethodsElectronic searches were conducted based on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science using Medical Subject Headings terms and relevant keywords. Using response rates as the primary outcome and adverse effects as the secondary outcome, statistical analysis was performed via Stata 15.1 SE, with Cochrane Q and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics used for heterogeneity assessment. Publication bias and sensitivity analyses were conducted using various methods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.ResultsThe analysis included six randomized controlled trials involving 4681 children with atopic dermatitis. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors were associated with significantly higher response rates than vehicle controls (odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.58 to 2.56, p < 0.001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 54.8%), with no significant difference in adverse effect incidence (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.87 to 1.30, p = 0.536, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 11.8%). Subgroup analysis revealed varying response rates among different phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, with crisaborole showing the least adverse effects.ConclusionOur meta-analysis revealed that children with atopic dermatitis treated with phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors experienced higher remission rates and comparable adverse effect rates compared with vehicle controls. Currently, crisaborole appears to be the optimal choice for balancing safety and efficacy. As research in this area is still in its early stages, further high-quality trials are essential for establishing standards of clinical care.INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202520121.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 4","pages":"3000605251333654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251333654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.MethodsElectronic searches were conducted based on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science using Medical Subject Headings terms and relevant keywords. Using response rates as the primary outcome and adverse effects as the secondary outcome, statistical analysis was performed via Stata 15.1 SE, with Cochrane Q and I2 statistics used for heterogeneity assessment. Publication bias and sensitivity analyses were conducted using various methods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.ResultsThe analysis included six randomized controlled trials involving 4681 children with atopic dermatitis. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors were associated with significantly higher response rates than vehicle controls (odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.58 to 2.56, p < 0.001, I2 = 54.8%), with no significant difference in adverse effect incidence (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.87 to 1.30, p = 0.536, I2 = 11.8%). Subgroup analysis revealed varying response rates among different phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, with crisaborole showing the least adverse effects.ConclusionOur meta-analysis revealed that children with atopic dermatitis treated with phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors experienced higher remission rates and comparable adverse effect rates compared with vehicle controls. Currently, crisaborole appears to be the optimal choice for balancing safety and efficacy. As research in this area is still in its early stages, further high-quality trials are essential for establishing standards of clinical care.INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202520121.

局部磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂治疗轻度至中度特应性皮炎的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的评价磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂治疗儿童轻中度特应性皮炎的疗效及不良反应。方法采用医学主题词及相关关键词,在PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Web of Science等数据库中进行电子检索。以有效率为主要转归,不良反应为次要转归,采用Stata 15.1 SE进行统计学分析,采用Cochrane Q和I2统计进行异质性评估。采用不同的方法进行发表偏倚和敏感性分析。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果本分析纳入6项随机对照试验,涉及4681例特应性皮炎患儿。磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂组的有效率显著高于对照组(优势比= 2.01,95%可信区间:1.58 ~ 2.56,p 2 = 54.8%),不良反应发生率无显著差异(优势比= 1.07,95%可信区间:0.87 ~ 1.30,p = 0.536, p 2 = 11.8%)。亚组分析显示不同磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂的反应率不同,crisaborole显示出最小的不良反应。我们的荟萃分析显示,与对照相比,接受磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂治疗的特应性皮炎儿童有更高的缓解率和相当的不良反应率。目前,crisaborole似乎是平衡安全性和有效性的最佳选择。由于这一领域的研究仍处于早期阶段,进一步的高质量试验对于建立临床护理标准至关重要。INPLASY注册号:INPLASY202520121。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信