Carlos Minguito-Carazo, Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday, Javier García Seara, Jose Luis Martínez Sande, Xesus Alberte Fernández López, Federico García-Rodeja Arias, Olekshander Shangutov, Juliana Elices Teja, Beatriz González Chana, Teba González Ferrero, Carlos Tilves Bellas, José Ramón González Juanatey, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero
{"title":"Simplified 3-ganglionated plexus ablation for the treatment of recurrent vasovagal syncope and functional bradyarrhythmia.","authors":"Carlos Minguito-Carazo, Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday, Javier García Seara, Jose Luis Martínez Sande, Xesus Alberte Fernández López, Federico García-Rodeja Arias, Olekshander Shangutov, Juliana Elices Teja, Beatriz González Chana, Teba González Ferrero, Carlos Tilves Bellas, José Ramón González Juanatey, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is an emerging treatment for recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS), extrinsically mediated atrioventricular block (AVB), and sinus node dysfunction (SND). However, there is ongoing debate regarding the number of ganglionated plexuses (GPs) to ablate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate differences in the degree of autonomic denervation and clinical outcomes between a simplified 3-GP ablation strategy and an extensive ablation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study of patients with recurrent VVS, extrinsic AVB, or SND. Patients were categorized into group A (3-GP ablation: right superior, left superior, and left posteromedial GP) and group B (additional GP ablation). Primary outcomes included relative heart rate (HR) increase after the atropine test at baseline and 6 months and syncope or pacemaker-free survival in the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 58 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the relative HR increase after the atropine test following CNA (A: 9.9% [4.1-19.0] vs B: 5.6% [2.8-8.4], P = .069) or at 6 months (A: 24.8% [15.0-37.2] vs B: 19.9% [16.8-25.4], P = .277). Similarly, after 19.1 (9.2-26.8) months there were no significant differences in syncope or pacemaker-free survival between groups (A: 15.2% vs B: 32.0%; log-rank P = .467). No significant differences were observed in most HR variability parameters or autonomic functional tests. Both groups showed a significant improvement in the SF-36 quality-of-life score (physical function p<.001, health change P < .001). Procedural time (P = .036) and fluoroscopy time (P = .015) were significantly shorter in the only 3-GP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simplified 3-GP ablation strategy resulted in similar autonomic denervation and clinical outcomes compared with an extended ablation approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is an emerging treatment for recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS), extrinsically mediated atrioventricular block (AVB), and sinus node dysfunction (SND). However, there is ongoing debate regarding the number of ganglionated plexuses (GPs) to ablate.
Objective: To evaluate differences in the degree of autonomic denervation and clinical outcomes between a simplified 3-GP ablation strategy and an extensive ablation approach.
Methods: This is a prospective, observational study of patients with recurrent VVS, extrinsic AVB, or SND. Patients were categorized into group A (3-GP ablation: right superior, left superior, and left posteromedial GP) and group B (additional GP ablation). Primary outcomes included relative heart rate (HR) increase after the atropine test at baseline and 6 months and syncope or pacemaker-free survival in the follow-up.
Results: Overall, 58 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the relative HR increase after the atropine test following CNA (A: 9.9% [4.1-19.0] vs B: 5.6% [2.8-8.4], P = .069) or at 6 months (A: 24.8% [15.0-37.2] vs B: 19.9% [16.8-25.4], P = .277). Similarly, after 19.1 (9.2-26.8) months there were no significant differences in syncope or pacemaker-free survival between groups (A: 15.2% vs B: 32.0%; log-rank P = .467). No significant differences were observed in most HR variability parameters or autonomic functional tests. Both groups showed a significant improvement in the SF-36 quality-of-life score (physical function p<.001, health change P < .001). Procedural time (P = .036) and fluoroscopy time (P = .015) were significantly shorter in the only 3-GP group.
Conclusion: A simplified 3-GP ablation strategy resulted in similar autonomic denervation and clinical outcomes compared with an extended ablation approach.
背景:心血管消融术(CNA)是一种治疗复发性血管迷走神经性晕厥(VVS)、外源性房室传导阻滞(AVB)和窦房结功能障碍(SND)的新方法。然而,关于切除神经节神经丛(GP)的数量仍存在争议。目的:评价简化的三gp消融策略与广泛消融方法在自主神经去支配程度和临床结果上的差异。方法:对复发性VVS、外源性AVB或SND患者进行前瞻性观察研究。患者分为A组(三GP消融:右上GP、左上GP和左后内侧GP)和B组(额外GP消融)。主要结局包括基线和6个月阿托品试验后的相对心率(HR)增加,以及随访中晕厥或无起搏器生存。结果:纳入58例患者。CNA后阿托品试验后相对HR增加(A: 9.9% [4.1-19.0] vs. B: 5.6% [2.8-8.4], p=0.069)或6个月时(A: 24.8% [15.0-37.2] vs. B: 19.9% [16.8-25.4], p=0.277)无显著差异。同样,19.1(9.2-26.8)个月后,两组间晕厥或无起搏器生存率无显著差异(A组:15.2% vs. B组:32.0%;log-rank p = 0.467)。在大多数HRV参数或自主功能测试中没有观察到显著差异。两组患者的SF-36生活质量评分均有显著改善。仅3-GP组手术时间(p=0.036)和透视时间(p=0.015)均明显缩短。结论:与扩展消融方法相比,简化的三gp消融策略可获得相似的自主神经去支配和临床结果。
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.