Neuro-oncology Caregiver Intervention Associated With Changes in C-Reactive Protein.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Paula R Sherwood, Florien Boele, Jason Weimer, Anna Marsland, Jan Drappatz, Terri S Armstrong, Lauren Terhorst, Heidi S Donovan
{"title":"Neuro-oncology Caregiver Intervention Associated With Changes in C-Reactive Protein.","authors":"Paula R Sherwood, Florien Boele, Jason Weimer, Anna Marsland, Jan Drappatz, Terri S Armstrong, Lauren Terhorst, Heidi S Donovan","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress biomarkers are documented in neuro-oncology family caregivers, although those reported to date are not routinely assessed in primary care, limiting their clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This secondary analysis explored the impact of an 8-week, nurse-caregiver collaborative problem-solving intervention on a clinically relevant biomarker (C-reactive protein [CRP]) in adult neuro-oncology family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Interventions/methods: </strong>As part of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a problem-solving intervention, CRP levels were obtained from 80 caregivers of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor at baseline and immediately following the intervention (intervention n = 57, control n = 23). Analysis used generalized linear modeling and evaluation of change in cardiac risk over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory analysis found a significant (P < .03) time × group interaction; mean CRP in the intervention group decreased over time (mean = 1.11-0.88), whereas that in the control group increased over time (mean = 0.63-1.30). A higher number of caregivers in the control group (50%) had an increase in cardiovascular risk defined by CRP level compared with those in the intervention group (11%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest CRP may be a clinically relevant measure of caregiver stress, which is readily used in primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Given the observed association between CRP levels and psychological stress among this cohort of neuro-oncology caregivers, primary care providers should consider incorporating CRP testing as part of routine assessments for caregiver health. This could facilitate early identification of heightened stress levels and associated cardiovascular risk, enabling timely interventions to support caregiver well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress biomarkers are documented in neuro-oncology family caregivers, although those reported to date are not routinely assessed in primary care, limiting their clinical utility.

Objective: This secondary analysis explored the impact of an 8-week, nurse-caregiver collaborative problem-solving intervention on a clinically relevant biomarker (C-reactive protein [CRP]) in adult neuro-oncology family caregivers.

Interventions/methods: As part of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a problem-solving intervention, CRP levels were obtained from 80 caregivers of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor at baseline and immediately following the intervention (intervention n = 57, control n = 23). Analysis used generalized linear modeling and evaluation of change in cardiac risk over time.

Results: Exploratory analysis found a significant (P < .03) time × group interaction; mean CRP in the intervention group decreased over time (mean = 1.11-0.88), whereas that in the control group increased over time (mean = 0.63-1.30). A higher number of caregivers in the control group (50%) had an increase in cardiovascular risk defined by CRP level compared with those in the intervention group (11%).

Conclusions: Results suggest CRP may be a clinically relevant measure of caregiver stress, which is readily used in primary care practice.

Implications for practice: Given the observed association between CRP levels and psychological stress among this cohort of neuro-oncology caregivers, primary care providers should consider incorporating CRP testing as part of routine assessments for caregiver health. This could facilitate early identification of heightened stress levels and associated cardiovascular risk, enabling timely interventions to support caregiver well-being.

神经肿瘤护理干预与c反应蛋白变化相关。
背景:神经肿瘤学家庭护理人员中记录了压力生物标志物,尽管迄今为止尚未在初级保健中进行常规评估,限制了其临床应用。目的:本二级分析探讨了为期8周的护理-护理协作解决问题干预对成年神经肿瘤家庭护理人员临床相关生物标志物(c -反应蛋白[CRP])的影响。干预措施/方法:作为评估解决问题干预措施有效性的随机临床试验的一部分,我们从80名原发性恶性脑肿瘤患者的护理人员(干预n = 57,对照n = 23)中获得了CRP水平。分析采用广义线性模型并评估心脏风险随时间的变化。结果:探索性分析发现时间×组交互作用显著(P < .03);干预组CRP均值随时间降低(平均值= 1.11-0.88),对照组CRP均值随时间升高(平均值= 0.63-1.30)。与干预组(11%)相比,对照组护理人员(50%)的CRP水平定义的心血管风险增加。结论:结果表明CRP可能是一种临床相关的护理人员压力测量方法,可以在初级保健实践中使用。实践意义:考虑到在这组神经肿瘤护理人员中观察到的CRP水平与心理压力之间的关联,初级保健提供者应考虑将CRP检测作为护理人员健康常规评估的一部分。这可以促进早期识别压力水平升高和相关心血管风险,使及时干预能够支持护理人员的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Nursing
Cancer Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信