Subtraction CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Artery Disease with Severe Arterial Calcification.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ryoichi Tanaka, Kunihiro Yoshioka
{"title":"Subtraction CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Artery Disease with Severe Arterial Calcification.","authors":"Ryoichi Tanaka, Kunihiro Yoshioka","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12040131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Peripheral arterial CT angiography (CTA) is an alternative to conventional angiography for diagnosing lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). However, severe arterial calcifications often hinder accurate assessment of arterial stenosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of subtraction CTA with volume position matching compared to conventional CTA, using invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. (2) Methods: Thirty-two patients with LEAD (mean age: 69.6 ± 10.8 years; M/F = 28:4) underwent subtraction CTA and DSA. The arterial tree was divided into 20 segments per patient, excluding segments with a history of bypass surgery. Subtraction was performed separately for each limb using volume position matching. Maximum intensity projections were reconstructed from both conventional and subtraction CTA data. Percent stenosis per arterial segment was measured using calipers and compared with DSA. Segments were classified as stenotic (>50% luminal narrowing) or not, with heavily calcified or stented segments assigned as incorrect. (3) Results: Of 640 segments, 636 were analyzed. Subtraction CTA and conventional CTA left 13 (2.0%) and 160 (25.2%) segments uninterpretable, respectively. Diagnostic accuracies (accuracy, precision, recall, macro F1 score) for subtraction CTA were 0.885, 0.884, 0.936, and 0.909, compared to 0.657, 0.744, 0.675, and 0.708 for conventional CTA. (4) Conclusions: Subtraction CTA with volume position matching is feasible and achieves high diagnostic accuracy in patients with severe calcific sclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12040131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Peripheral arterial CT angiography (CTA) is an alternative to conventional angiography for diagnosing lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). However, severe arterial calcifications often hinder accurate assessment of arterial stenosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of subtraction CTA with volume position matching compared to conventional CTA, using invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. (2) Methods: Thirty-two patients with LEAD (mean age: 69.6 ± 10.8 years; M/F = 28:4) underwent subtraction CTA and DSA. The arterial tree was divided into 20 segments per patient, excluding segments with a history of bypass surgery. Subtraction was performed separately for each limb using volume position matching. Maximum intensity projections were reconstructed from both conventional and subtraction CTA data. Percent stenosis per arterial segment was measured using calipers and compared with DSA. Segments were classified as stenotic (>50% luminal narrowing) or not, with heavily calcified or stented segments assigned as incorrect. (3) Results: Of 640 segments, 636 were analyzed. Subtraction CTA and conventional CTA left 13 (2.0%) and 160 (25.2%) segments uninterpretable, respectively. Diagnostic accuracies (accuracy, precision, recall, macro F1 score) for subtraction CTA were 0.885, 0.884, 0.936, and 0.909, compared to 0.657, 0.744, 0.675, and 0.708 for conventional CTA. (4) Conclusions: Subtraction CTA with volume position matching is feasible and achieves high diagnostic accuracy in patients with severe calcific sclerosis.

减影CT血管造影对下肢动脉病变伴严重动脉钙化的评价。
(1)背景:外周动脉CT血管造影(CTA)是诊断下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)的一种替代方法。然而,严重的动脉钙化往往阻碍动脉狭窄的准确评估。本研究以有创数字减影血管造影(DSA)为金标准,评估减影CTA容积位置匹配与传统CTA的诊断性能。(2)方法:32例铅铅患者(平均年龄:69.6±10.8岁;M/F = 28:4)行CTA和DSA减法。每位患者的动脉树分为20段,不包括有搭桥手术史的段。使用体积位置匹配分别对每个肢体进行减法。利用常规和减法CTA数据重建最大强度投影。用卡尺测量每个动脉段狭窄的百分比,并与DSA进行比较。管段被划分为狭窄(管腔狭窄50%)或非狭窄,严重钙化或支架化的管段被划分为不正确。(3)结果:640个片段中,分析了636个。减法CTA和常规CTA分别留下13段(2.0%)和160段(25.2%)无法解释。减法CTA的诊断准确率(准确度、精密度、召回率、宏观F1评分)分别为0.885、0.884、0.936和0.909,而常规CTA的诊断准确率分别为0.657、0.744、0.675和0.708。(4)结论:减影CTA容积位置匹配对重度钙化硬化患者的诊断是可行的,具有较高的诊断准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信