Safety profile of intracranial neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in children.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shikha Singh, Caren Armstrong, Susan E Melamed, Kathleen Galligan, Michelle Han, Marissa DiGiovine, Sudha K Kessler, Benjamin C Kennedy
{"title":"Safety profile of intracranial neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in children.","authors":"Shikha Singh, Caren Armstrong, Susan E Melamed, Kathleen Galligan, Michelle Han, Marissa DiGiovine, Sudha K Kessler, Benjamin C Kennedy","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.PEDS24463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in whom resection or disconnective surgeries are not recommended can still benefit from neurostimulation. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is FDA approved for those aged 4 years and older, but intracranial stimulators, that is, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices, are only approved for those aged 18 years and older. Studies in adults and early experience in children suggest that intracranial stimulation may be more effective than VNS but with higher risk. This risk has not been examined in large pediatric cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of RNS and DBS for pediatric DRE as well as the possible risk factors for wound-related complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined the records of DRE patients who underwent RNS or DBS at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from November 2017 to March 2024 with at least 6 months of follow-up. DBS electrodes were placed in the anterior or centromedian nucleus of the thalamus. RNS electrodes were placed in seizure foci.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients, aged 6-22 years, underwent intracranial stimulator implantation for DRE (24 DBS, 30 RNS). The mean follow-up was 24.4 ± 15.3 months (median 21 months, range 6-69 months). Five (9.3%) patients returned to surgery, 3 (5.6%) of whom required explant and 1 (1.9%) of whom required explant and also had a surgical site infection (SSI). Prior craniotomy was a significant risk factor for wound-related complications (p = 0.0046 in all patients, p = 0.0375 in patients < 18 years). No patient experienced hemorrhage, lead malposition, device malfunction, or long-term stimulation-induced paresthesia, depression, or memory loss. The overall responder rates, defined by achieving 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, were 54% in the RNS cohort and 73% in the DBS cohort at the 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest single-center series of intracranial stimulation for pediatric DRE. In comparison with established rates of SSI and explant in adults (12% and 7.0% in the RNS pivotal trial and 13% and 8.6% in the DBS SANTE [Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy] trial, respectively), the present cohort demonstrated favorable rates of 1.9% and 5.6%, respectively. Studies with larger pediatric DRE cohorts are needed with longer follow-up and seizure outcomes to elucidate the risk/benefit balance of intracranial stimulation in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.PEDS24463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in whom resection or disconnective surgeries are not recommended can still benefit from neurostimulation. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is FDA approved for those aged 4 years and older, but intracranial stimulators, that is, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices, are only approved for those aged 18 years and older. Studies in adults and early experience in children suggest that intracranial stimulation may be more effective than VNS but with higher risk. This risk has not been examined in large pediatric cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of RNS and DBS for pediatric DRE as well as the possible risk factors for wound-related complications.

Methods: This retrospective study examined the records of DRE patients who underwent RNS or DBS at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from November 2017 to March 2024 with at least 6 months of follow-up. DBS electrodes were placed in the anterior or centromedian nucleus of the thalamus. RNS electrodes were placed in seizure foci.

Results: A total of 54 patients, aged 6-22 years, underwent intracranial stimulator implantation for DRE (24 DBS, 30 RNS). The mean follow-up was 24.4 ± 15.3 months (median 21 months, range 6-69 months). Five (9.3%) patients returned to surgery, 3 (5.6%) of whom required explant and 1 (1.9%) of whom required explant and also had a surgical site infection (SSI). Prior craniotomy was a significant risk factor for wound-related complications (p = 0.0046 in all patients, p = 0.0375 in patients < 18 years). No patient experienced hemorrhage, lead malposition, device malfunction, or long-term stimulation-induced paresthesia, depression, or memory loss. The overall responder rates, defined by achieving 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, were 54% in the RNS cohort and 73% in the DBS cohort at the 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest single-center series of intracranial stimulation for pediatric DRE. In comparison with established rates of SSI and explant in adults (12% and 7.0% in the RNS pivotal trial and 13% and 8.6% in the DBS SANTE [Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy] trial, respectively), the present cohort demonstrated favorable rates of 1.9% and 5.6%, respectively. Studies with larger pediatric DRE cohorts are needed with longer follow-up and seizure outcomes to elucidate the risk/benefit balance of intracranial stimulation in children.

颅内神经调节治疗儿童耐药癫痫的安全性分析。
目的:不建议切除或分离手术的耐药癫痫患儿仍可从神经刺激中获益。迷走神经刺激(VNS)被FDA批准用于4岁及以上的患者,但颅内刺激器,即反应性神经刺激(RNS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)装置,仅被批准用于18岁及以上的患者。成人的研究和儿童的早期经验表明,颅内刺激可能比VNS更有效,但风险更高。这种风险尚未在大型儿科队列中得到检验。本研究旨在评估RNS和DBS治疗儿童DRE的安全性,以及伤口相关并发症的可能危险因素。方法:回顾性研究2017年11月至2024年3月在费城儿童医院接受RNS或DBS治疗的DRE患者的记录,随访至少6个月。DBS电极放置在丘脑前核或正中核。RNS电极置于癫痫发作灶。结果:54例患者接受了DRE颅内刺激器植入(DBS 24例,RNS 30例),年龄6 ~ 22岁。平均随访24.4±15.3个月(中位21个月,范围6 ~ 69个月)。5例(9.3%)患者返回手术,其中3例(5.6%)患者需要外植体,1例(1.9%)患者需要外植体并伴有手术部位感染(SSI)。既往开颅手术是伤口相关并发症的重要危险因素(所有患者p = 0.0046, < 18岁患者p = 0.0375)。没有患者出现出血、导联错位、装置故障或长期刺激引起的感觉异常、抑郁或记忆丧失。在12个月的随访中,RNS组的总应答率为54%,DBS组的总应答率为73%,定义为癫痫发作频率降低50%或以上。结论:据作者所知,本研究是针对儿童DRE的最大的单中心颅内刺激系列研究。与成人中SSI和外植体的既定率(RNS关键试验中分别为12%和7.0%,DBS SANTE试验中分别为13%和8.6%)相比,本队列分别显示出1.9%和5.6%的有利率。需要对更大的儿童DRE队列进行更长的随访和癫痫发作结果的研究,以阐明颅内刺激对儿童的风险/收益平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信