Attachment style and its impact on connection to God in individuals with brain injury: behavioral and lesion-based findings.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1488890
Shira Cohen-Zimerman, Irene Cristofori, Patrick McNamara, Frank Krueger, Barry Gordon, Jordan Grafman
{"title":"Attachment style and its impact on connection to God in individuals with brain injury: behavioral and lesion-based findings.","authors":"Shira Cohen-Zimerman, Irene Cristofori, Patrick McNamara, Frank Krueger, Barry Gordon, Jordan Grafman","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1488890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attachment style shapes one's connections with important figures in their life. One such unique relationship is the connection to God (CTG), which may be shaped by attachment style. Stronger CTG has been associated with secure attachment, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. While previous research has implicated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in CTG, findings have been mixed and may depend on attachment style-an idea that has yet to be directly tested. This study aimed to (1) examine whether individuals with a secure attachment style report higher levels of CTG compared to those with a non-secure attachment style, and (2) identify the brain regions associated with CTG in individuals with secure vs. non-secure attachment. We assessed attachment style and CTG in a sample of male combat veterans (<i>N</i> = 150), the majority of whom had focal traumatic brain injuries (pTBI; <i>N</i> = 119). Brain imaging (CT scans) was also obtained. Behaviorally, after controlling for age, years of education, and brain volume loss, individuals with a secure attachment style reported stronger CTG. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping revealed that damage to the right orbitofrontal cortex was associated with stronger CTG in individuals with secure-but not insecure-attachment. These findings suggest that attachment style shapes CTG at both behavioral and neural levels. Moreover, they highlight the potential role of attachment style in TBI recovery, offering insights that could inform spiritually integrated therapeutic interventions and support strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1488890"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1488890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attachment style shapes one's connections with important figures in their life. One such unique relationship is the connection to God (CTG), which may be shaped by attachment style. Stronger CTG has been associated with secure attachment, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. While previous research has implicated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in CTG, findings have been mixed and may depend on attachment style-an idea that has yet to be directly tested. This study aimed to (1) examine whether individuals with a secure attachment style report higher levels of CTG compared to those with a non-secure attachment style, and (2) identify the brain regions associated with CTG in individuals with secure vs. non-secure attachment. We assessed attachment style and CTG in a sample of male combat veterans (N = 150), the majority of whom had focal traumatic brain injuries (pTBI; N = 119). Brain imaging (CT scans) was also obtained. Behaviorally, after controlling for age, years of education, and brain volume loss, individuals with a secure attachment style reported stronger CTG. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping revealed that damage to the right orbitofrontal cortex was associated with stronger CTG in individuals with secure-but not insecure-attachment. These findings suggest that attachment style shapes CTG at both behavioral and neural levels. Moreover, they highlight the potential role of attachment style in TBI recovery, offering insights that could inform spiritually integrated therapeutic interventions and support strategies.

依恋类型及其对脑损伤个体与上帝联系的影响:基于行为和病变的发现。
依恋类型塑造了一个人与生活中重要人物的联系。其中一种独特的关系是与上帝的联系(CTG),这可能是由依恋类型塑造的。较强的CTG与安全依恋有关,但这种关系背后的神经机制尚不清楚。虽然之前的研究表明前额叶皮层(PFC)与CTG有关,但研究结果好坏参半,可能取决于依恋类型——这一观点尚未得到直接测试。本研究旨在(1)研究安全依恋类型的个体是否比非安全依恋类型的个体报告更高的CTG水平;(2)确定安全依恋类型与非安全依恋类型的个体与CTG相关的大脑区域。我们对150名男性退伍军人(N = 150)的依恋风格和CTG进行了评估,其中大多数有局灶性创伤性脑损伤(pTBI;N = 119)。同时获得脑成像(CT扫描)。行为上,在控制了年龄、受教育年限和脑容量损失后,安全型依恋类型的个体报告了更强的CTG。基于体素的损伤症状图谱显示,在安全依恋而非不安全依恋的个体中,右眼窝额叶皮层的损伤与更强的CTG相关。这些发现表明,依恋类型在行为和神经水平上塑造CTG。此外,他们强调了依恋类型在创伤性脑损伤恢复中的潜在作用,提供了可以为精神上的综合治疗干预和支持策略提供信息的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信