[Validation of the Emotional Eating Questionnaire in Mexican adults with overweight and obesity].

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS
Lisett Hernández-Ponce, Blanca Rosalba Pardo-Pacheco, Claudia C Calzada-Mendoza, Otto P González-Guzmán, Sandra Aguilar-Maciel, Cruz Vargas-De-León
{"title":"[Validation of the Emotional Eating Questionnaire in Mexican adults with overweight and obesity].","authors":"Lisett Hernández-Ponce, Blanca Rosalba Pardo-Pacheco, Claudia C Calzada-Mendoza, Otto P González-Guzmán, Sandra Aguilar-Maciel, Cruz Vargas-De-León","doi":"10.20960/nh.05490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>negative emotions and persistent stress can lead to abnormal compensatory behaviors, known as emotional eating (EE). However, there is a gap in research aimed at validating EE questionnaires for specific populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to validate the Emotional Eating Questionnaire (EEQ) in overweight and obese Mexican adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>this is a clinimetric study. Participants included sedentary individuals aged 18 to 60 years with overweight or obesity. The study comprised three phases: a Delphi panel to validate content, administration of the EEQ to a sample of at least 300 participants, and a retest of the EEQ with 15 % of the sample to assess test-retest reliability. Criterion validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA goodness of fit, reliability via Cronbach's alpha and Dillon-Goldstein's rho, and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were verified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 508 participants were recruited (123 men and 385 women), with an average age of 44.5 years (standard deviation = 10.6). The average BMI was 32.5 (range, 27.0-59.3). The Delphi panel validated the content in 2 rounds. The CFA showed excellent goodness of fit. Internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha, 0.822; Dillon-Goldstein's rho, 0.863). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC, 0.60) in 78 participants reassessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the EEQ was shown to be reliable and valid for assessing emotional eating in overweight and obese Mexican adults, distinguished by its simplicity and ease of use among participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.05490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: negative emotions and persistent stress can lead to abnormal compensatory behaviors, known as emotional eating (EE). However, there is a gap in research aimed at validating EE questionnaires for specific populations.

Objective: to validate the Emotional Eating Questionnaire (EEQ) in overweight and obese Mexican adults.

Methods: this is a clinimetric study. Participants included sedentary individuals aged 18 to 60 years with overweight or obesity. The study comprised three phases: a Delphi panel to validate content, administration of the EEQ to a sample of at least 300 participants, and a retest of the EEQ with 15 % of the sample to assess test-retest reliability. Criterion validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA goodness of fit, reliability via Cronbach's alpha and Dillon-Goldstein's rho, and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were verified.

Results: a total of 508 participants were recruited (123 men and 385 women), with an average age of 44.5 years (standard deviation = 10.6). The average BMI was 32.5 (range, 27.0-59.3). The Delphi panel validated the content in 2 rounds. The CFA showed excellent goodness of fit. Internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha, 0.822; Dillon-Goldstein's rho, 0.863). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC, 0.60) in 78 participants reassessed.

Conclusion: the EEQ was shown to be reliable and valid for assessing emotional eating in overweight and obese Mexican adults, distinguished by its simplicity and ease of use among participants.

[情绪饮食问卷在墨西哥超重和肥胖成年人中的验证]。
负面情绪和持续的压力会导致异常的代偿行为,被称为情绪进食(EE)。然而,在针对特定人群验证情感表达问卷的研究中存在空白。目的:验证墨西哥超重和肥胖成年人情绪进食问卷(EEQ)的有效性。方法:这是一项临床计量学研究。参与者包括年龄在18到60岁之间的久坐不动的超重或肥胖人群。该研究包括三个阶段:验证内容的德尔菲小组,对至少300名参与者的样本进行EEQ管理,以及对15%的样本进行EEQ重测以评估测试重测的可靠性。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估标准效度。检验了CFA拟合优度、Cronbach’s alpha和Dillon-Goldstein’s rho的信度以及类内相关系数(ICC)的重测信度。结果:共招募了508名参与者(123名男性,385名女性),平均年龄44.5岁(标准差= 10.6)。平均BMI为32.5(范围27.0-59.3)。德尔菲小组分两轮对内容进行验证。CFA显示出极好的拟合优度。内部一致性较好(Cronbach’s alpha, 0.822;Dillon-Goldstein's, 0.863)。重新评估的78名参与者的重测信度是可接受的(ICC, 0.60)。结论:EEQ被证明是可靠和有效的评估情绪饮食超重和肥胖的墨西哥成年人,其特点是简单和易于使用的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信