Autoantibody detection by conventional and novel mosaic BIOCHIP technique: A comparative analysis for the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Punya Suvarna, Raghavendra Rao
{"title":"Autoantibody detection by conventional and novel mosaic BIOCHIP technique: A comparative analysis for the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases.","authors":"Punya Suvarna, Raghavendra Rao","doi":"10.25259/IJDVL_1089_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Circulating autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases can be detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy. The sensitivity of this method depends on the substrate used. Normal human skin (NHS) and salt-split skin (SSS) are widely used in conventional serodiagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. A novel mosaic biochip has been reported to be a highly sensitive and specific test to detect the circulating antibodies in this subset of patients. Objectives This study was designed to compare IIF microscopy by conventional and mosaic biochip technologies in the serodiagnosis of patients with autoimmune bullous diseases. Methods This cross-sectional study included sera of 103 patients with autoimmune bullous diseases. Conventional IIF microscopy was carried out using NHS and SSS substrates. IIF using the mosaic biochip was performed as per the manufacturer's instructions. Results The conventional technique detected intercellular staining with IgG in 62 patients, and the mosaic biochip detected it in 56 monkey oesophageal samples. The latter also detected both desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3 in 45 patients and Dsg 1 and 3 individually in eight and ten serum samples, respectively. Both techniques detected epidermal staining in the SSS of 37 patients with sub-epidermal autoimmune bullous diseases, and dermal staining was observed in seven sera. Seventeen patients with epidermal staining patterns revealed antibodies to BP180 only; six patients showed reactivity to both BP 180 and 230. Limitation Due to financial constraints, sera of healthy controls could not be studied. Conclusions The BIOCHIP mosaic IIF is an useful adjunct IIF technique. It not only helps to detect the staining pattern but also identify the target antigens in common autoimmune bullous disease. Sensitivity of conventional IIF in detecting ICS is 93.9% in contrast to 84.4% with the BIOCHIP mosaic technique. However, mosaic BIOCHIP technique helped to identify the target antigens in common AIBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50376,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology","volume":" ","pages":"482-487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJDVL_1089_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Circulating autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases can be detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy. The sensitivity of this method depends on the substrate used. Normal human skin (NHS) and salt-split skin (SSS) are widely used in conventional serodiagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. A novel mosaic biochip has been reported to be a highly sensitive and specific test to detect the circulating antibodies in this subset of patients. Objectives This study was designed to compare IIF microscopy by conventional and mosaic biochip technologies in the serodiagnosis of patients with autoimmune bullous diseases. Methods This cross-sectional study included sera of 103 patients with autoimmune bullous diseases. Conventional IIF microscopy was carried out using NHS and SSS substrates. IIF using the mosaic biochip was performed as per the manufacturer's instructions. Results The conventional technique detected intercellular staining with IgG in 62 patients, and the mosaic biochip detected it in 56 monkey oesophageal samples. The latter also detected both desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3 in 45 patients and Dsg 1 and 3 individually in eight and ten serum samples, respectively. Both techniques detected epidermal staining in the SSS of 37 patients with sub-epidermal autoimmune bullous diseases, and dermal staining was observed in seven sera. Seventeen patients with epidermal staining patterns revealed antibodies to BP180 only; six patients showed reactivity to both BP 180 and 230. Limitation Due to financial constraints, sera of healthy controls could not be studied. Conclusions The BIOCHIP mosaic IIF is an useful adjunct IIF technique. It not only helps to detect the staining pattern but also identify the target antigens in common autoimmune bullous disease. Sensitivity of conventional IIF in detecting ICS is 93.9% in contrast to 84.4% with the BIOCHIP mosaic technique. However, mosaic BIOCHIP technique helped to identify the target antigens in common AIBD.

传统与新型镶嵌式BIOCHIP技术检测自身抗体诊断自身免疫性大疱性疾病的比较分析。
背景:间接免疫荧光(IIF)显微镜可检测自身免疫性大疱性疾病患者的循环自身抗体。这种方法的灵敏度取决于所使用的衬底。正常人皮肤(NHS)和盐裂皮肤(SSS)被广泛用于自身免疫性大疱病的常规血清诊断。据报道,一种新的马赛克生物芯片是一种高度敏感和特异性的检测方法,可检测这类患者的循环抗体。目的比较常规IIF显微镜和镶嵌生物芯片技术在自身免疫性大疱性疾病患者血清诊断中的作用。方法对103例自身免疫性大疱性疾病患者的血清进行横断面研究。使用NHS和SSS底物进行常规IIF显微镜。使用马赛克生物芯片的IIF按照制造商的说明进行。结果常规方法检测62例患者的IgG细胞间染色,镶嵌生物芯片检测56例猴食管标本的IgG细胞间染色。后者还在45例患者中检测到desmoglin (Dsg) 1和3,并分别在8例和10例血清样本中检测到Dsg 1和3。两种技术均检测了37例亚表皮自身免疫性大疱性疾病患者SSS的表皮染色,并在7种血清中观察到皮肤染色。17例患者表皮染色仅显示BP180抗体;6例患者对BP 180和230均有反应。限制:由于经费限制,健康对照者的血清不能进行研究。结论BIOCHIP镶嵌IIF技术是一种有效的辅助IIF技术。它不仅有助于检测染色模式,而且有助于识别常见自身免疫性大疱病的靶抗原。传统IIF检测ICS的灵敏度为93.9%,而BIOCHIP镶嵌技术的灵敏度为84.4%。然而,mosaic BIOCHIP技术有助于识别常见AIBD的靶抗原。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists & Leprologists (IADVL) is the national association of Indian medical specialists who manage patients with skin disorders, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or leprosy. The current member strength of the association is about 3800. The association works for the betterment of the specialty by holding academic meetings, printing a journal and publishing a textbook. The IADVL has several state branches, each with their own office bearers, which function independently within the constitution of the IADVL. Established in 1940, the Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology (IJDVL, ISSN 0378-6323) is the official publication of the IADVL (Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信