Differential inhibitory effects of endocannabinoids on neuronal firing of mouse meningeal afferents.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Georgii Krivoshein, Adriana Della Pietra, Juha Savinainen, Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg, Rashid Giniatullin
{"title":"Differential inhibitory effects of endocannabinoids on neuronal firing of mouse meningeal afferents.","authors":"Georgii Krivoshein, Adriana Della Pietra, Juha Savinainen, Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg, Rashid Giniatullin","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02041-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing endocannabinoids (endoCBs), anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), through inhibition of the degrading hydrolase enzymes, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), respectively, has been proposed as approach to alleviate migraine pain. Notwithstanding, the impact of AEA and 2-AG on neuronal firing of meningeal afferents, which is relevant to the genesis of migraine pain, remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The impact of AEA and 2-AG on meningeal nerve afferent firing was examined through electrophysiological evaluation upon application of 50 mM KCl with or without DMSO, exogenous AEA (10 µM), or 2-AG (10 µM) to separate groups of C57BL/6J mouse hemiskull preparations. At the end of each experiment, capsaicin (1 µM), an agonist of TRPV1 channels, was tested, as a positive control of presumably nociceptive firing. Advanced clustering and spectral analysis on the electrophysiological data allowed differentiating spiking patterns with respect to their temporal and neurochemical profiles. Activity-based protein profiling and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to assess endogenous FAAH and MAGL activity and determine endogenous levels of AEA and 2-AG in mouse meninges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Local application of endoCBs decreased KCl-induced firing of meningeal nerve afferents, which was most profound for AEA. AEA first produced a short, mild activation in firing, which was followed by a long-lasting reduction. Instead, 2-AG directly led to a short-lasting reduction in firing. Cluster analysis revealed that the transient activation by AEA involved fibers with small-amplitude spikes fired at rates of 1-2 Hz, whereas the persistently suppressed fibers consisted of high-amplitude spikes fired at rates exceeding 10 Hz. Only AEA inhibited subsequent capsaicininduced firing in the afferents long after AEA application, suggesting a broader mode of action for AEA than 2-AG. The more profound inhibitory effects of AEA are consistent with the observed higher activity of FAAH over MAGL and lower level of endogenous AEA than 2-AG in mouse meninges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed a stronger anti-nociceptive action of AEA than of 2-AG, as measured by meningeal afferent firing in mouse hemiskulls. This difference can be exploited for relieving migraine pain by primarily increasing the tone of AEA through inhibition of FAAH outside the central nervous system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02041-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing endocannabinoids (endoCBs), anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), through inhibition of the degrading hydrolase enzymes, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), respectively, has been proposed as approach to alleviate migraine pain. Notwithstanding, the impact of AEA and 2-AG on neuronal firing of meningeal afferents, which is relevant to the genesis of migraine pain, remains elusive.

Methods: The impact of AEA and 2-AG on meningeal nerve afferent firing was examined through electrophysiological evaluation upon application of 50 mM KCl with or without DMSO, exogenous AEA (10 µM), or 2-AG (10 µM) to separate groups of C57BL/6J mouse hemiskull preparations. At the end of each experiment, capsaicin (1 µM), an agonist of TRPV1 channels, was tested, as a positive control of presumably nociceptive firing. Advanced clustering and spectral analysis on the electrophysiological data allowed differentiating spiking patterns with respect to their temporal and neurochemical profiles. Activity-based protein profiling and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to assess endogenous FAAH and MAGL activity and determine endogenous levels of AEA and 2-AG in mouse meninges.

Results: Local application of endoCBs decreased KCl-induced firing of meningeal nerve afferents, which was most profound for AEA. AEA first produced a short, mild activation in firing, which was followed by a long-lasting reduction. Instead, 2-AG directly led to a short-lasting reduction in firing. Cluster analysis revealed that the transient activation by AEA involved fibers with small-amplitude spikes fired at rates of 1-2 Hz, whereas the persistently suppressed fibers consisted of high-amplitude spikes fired at rates exceeding 10 Hz. Only AEA inhibited subsequent capsaicininduced firing in the afferents long after AEA application, suggesting a broader mode of action for AEA than 2-AG. The more profound inhibitory effects of AEA are consistent with the observed higher activity of FAAH over MAGL and lower level of endogenous AEA than 2-AG in mouse meninges.

Conclusion: Our study revealed a stronger anti-nociceptive action of AEA than of 2-AG, as measured by meningeal afferent firing in mouse hemiskulls. This difference can be exploited for relieving migraine pain by primarily increasing the tone of AEA through inhibition of FAAH outside the central nervous system.

内源性大麻素对小鼠脑膜传入神经放电的不同抑制作用。
背景:通过抑制降解水解酶脂肪酸酰胺水解酶(FAAH)和单酰基甘油脂肪酶(MAGL),分别增加内源性大麻素(endocabinoids, endocb), anandamide (AEA)和2-花生四烯醇甘油(2-AG),已被提出作为缓解偏头痛的方法。尽管如此,AEA和2-AG对脑膜传入事件神经元放电的影响,这与偏头痛的发生有关,仍然是难以捉摸的。方法:分别给C57BL/6J小鼠半颅骨制剂分别加或不加DMSO、外源性AEA(10µM)、2-AG(10µM)、50 mM KCl,电生理评价AEA和2-AG对脑膜神经传入放电的影响。在每次实验结束时,测试TRPV1通道激动剂辣椒素(1µM),作为可能的伤害性放电的阳性对照。对电生理数据进行高级聚类和光谱分析,可以根据它们的时间和神经化学特征区分尖峰模式。采用基于活性的蛋白谱分析和液相色谱串联质谱法评估小鼠脑膜内源性FAAH和MAGL活性,并测定内源性AEA和2-AG水平。结果:局部应用endocb可减少kcl诱导的脑膜神经传入神经放电,其中对AEA的作用最为显著。AEA首先在放电中产生短暂、温和的激活,随后是持久的减少。相反,2-AG直接导致了燃烧的短期减少。聚类分析表明,AEA的瞬时激活涉及频率为1-2 Hz的小振幅峰值纤维,而持续抑制的纤维包括频率超过10 Hz的高振幅峰值纤维。在施用AEA后很长一段时间内,只有AEA能够抑制辣椒素诱导的后续放电,这表明AEA的作用模式比2-AG更广泛。小鼠脑膜中FAAH对MAGL的活性高于2-AG,内源性AEA水平低于2-AG,这与AEA更深刻的抑制作用相一致。结论:通过对小鼠脑半球脑膜传入放电的检测,我们发现AEA的抗伤害性作用强于2-AG。这种差异可以用于缓解偏头痛,主要是通过抑制中枢神经系统外的FAAH来增加AEA的张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信