TP53 minigene analysis of 161 sequence changes provides evidence for role of spatial constraint and regulatory elements on variant-induced splicing impact.
Daffodil M Canson, Inés Llinares-Burguet, Cristina Fortuno, Lara Sanoguera-Miralles, Elena Bueno-Martínez, Miguel de la Hoya, Amanda B Spurdle, Eladio A Velasco-Sampedro
{"title":"TP53 minigene analysis of 161 sequence changes provides evidence for role of spatial constraint and regulatory elements on variant-induced splicing impact.","authors":"Daffodil M Canson, Inés Llinares-Burguet, Cristina Fortuno, Lara Sanoguera-Miralles, Elena Bueno-Martínez, Miguel de la Hoya, Amanda B Spurdle, Eladio A Velasco-Sampedro","doi":"10.1038/s41525-025-00498-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the role of TP53 splicing regulatory elements (SREs) using exons 3 and 6 and their downstream introns as models. Minigene microdeletion assays revealed four SRE-rich intervals: c.573_598, c.618_641, c.653_669 and c.672+14_672 + 36. A diagnostically reported deletion c.655_670del, overlapping an SRE-rich interval, induced an in-frame transcript Δ(E6q21) from new donor site usage. Deletion of at least four intron 6 G-runs led to 100% aberrant transcript expression. Additionally, assay results suggested a donor-to-branchpoint distance <50 nt for complete splicing aberration due to spatial constraint, and >75 nt for low risk of splicing abnormality. Overall, splicing data for 134 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 27 deletions in TP53 demonstrated that SRE-disrupting SNVs have weak splicing impact (up to 26% exon skipping), while deletions spanning multiple SREs have profound splicing effects. Our findings may prove relevant for identifying novel germline TP53 variants causing hereditary cancer predisposition and/or somatic variants contributing to tumorigenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19273,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-025-00498-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the role of TP53 splicing regulatory elements (SREs) using exons 3 and 6 and their downstream introns as models. Minigene microdeletion assays revealed four SRE-rich intervals: c.573_598, c.618_641, c.653_669 and c.672+14_672 + 36. A diagnostically reported deletion c.655_670del, overlapping an SRE-rich interval, induced an in-frame transcript Δ(E6q21) from new donor site usage. Deletion of at least four intron 6 G-runs led to 100% aberrant transcript expression. Additionally, assay results suggested a donor-to-branchpoint distance <50 nt for complete splicing aberration due to spatial constraint, and >75 nt for low risk of splicing abnormality. Overall, splicing data for 134 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 27 deletions in TP53 demonstrated that SRE-disrupting SNVs have weak splicing impact (up to 26% exon skipping), while deletions spanning multiple SREs have profound splicing effects. Our findings may prove relevant for identifying novel germline TP53 variants causing hereditary cancer predisposition and/or somatic variants contributing to tumorigenesis.
NPJ Genomic MedicineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
67
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍:
npj Genomic Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in all aspects of genomics and its application in the practice of medicine.
The journal defines genomic medicine as "diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and/or treatment of disease and disorders of the mind and body, using approaches informed or enabled by knowledge of the genome and the molecules it encodes." Relevant and high-impact papers that encompass studies of individuals, families, or populations are considered for publication. An emphasis will include coupling detailed phenotype and genome sequencing information, both enabled by new technologies and informatics, to delineate the underlying aetiology of disease. Clinical recommendations and/or guidelines of how that data should be used in the clinical management of those patients in the study, and others, are also encouraged.